The article is written to promote visitors to read it, it has to say something dramatic or people wont bother to raise any interest to finish the page I guess. We just broke past the 200 day average and are now above the 50 day, its possible we do recover from here but the price remains weak and subject to continued doubts within a longer term bullish picture imo.
I dont think crypto is super cheap, but its now way off the highs. All the bullish talk from the previous rise is still as valid now and cheaper to participate and go forward with but also we can get cheaper prices. People tend to be worried a little too much with constantly what happens next, I try to only worry about the big problem of long term security and usage, etc.
Expected from "journalists" just to raise the view count imo, and doesn't really care about the topic at hand. A typical work of a so-called "journalist", they will attack certain topics that if you read between the lines doesn't really make sense at all. And you know, just to have an article to throw out there. Honestly, I don't really see any strong evidence proving such claims. And even if this becomes true, it will also get devoid before they even realize.
Cryptos being cheap isn't an option anymore. I guess you're right, even with some notable cryptos that are considered "cheap", generally, they are not cheap at all--if we're talking about the exchange of course.
I'm in the same boat as you are.
That is just an article to increase people's fear and they will lead holders to sell their Bitcoin.
As I've mentioned. This is more like false propaganda rather than an informative article to educate people. In our era now, it's very rare to read an article that really means something.
