Topic: Time to sue ButterflyLabs - Big Single-SC owner let's league for class action - page 12. (Read 39378 times)

Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.

Maybe two weeks? We are waiting for the test lab to issue the test report.

With the bump in power requirements on the MR and the new screen, we had to make changes, although the new screen is already certified.  We are doing all the devices at once, since they all share the same board.

Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.

Common sense would dictate sheer volume of orders once they opened it up.  But unfortunately, common sense is not common on this forum.  The hashing argument is one of the old standbys, debunked time and again, yet it still rears it's ugly head.  Listen to K9 sometime...  BFL is DAMN LUCKY to have 80TH on the network, and counting 150TH of Avalon chips he admits "Right now, all that I am aware of is the chips supposedly left Yifu's hands but never arrived in the customers".  But that 150TH drops BFL down to like 30TH on the network.  So by k9's theories alone you are mistaken about BFL hashing with customer rigs.

When is the Jalapeno getting FCC approval?

Surrrre you will.  Just like you lied last time about sending $200 to charity?  You are a habitual liar, Bruno.  You are a thief.  You are an embezzler.  You have no redeeming quality...

But lets see you hang yourself this time, here you go:  https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=132722&fcc_id='MSQME370T'

Josh, would you be so kind as to state which, what and when the screen was passed by the FCC? Us monumental assholes ain't got a clue as to how the FCC site works and desperately need your expertise in helping us find the info.

As soon as you show us, I will send that $200 I owe you/BFL, and you can use if for whatevery you want. It doesn't have to go to any charity. You, Sonny, and your wifes/lady friends can go to a fancy restaurant and enjoy a fine meal using the funds. No problem here, bud.

All you have to do is show us monumental assholes where to look, and your golden, and we're square.

I'll also take a week off and not state one iota negative comment about you, Sonny, BFL, et al. I promise... I mean Honest Abe.

Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL  60548

815-508-1668

Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.

Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.

When did it become acceptable for COOs of companies to go Full-Dox on people? I missed that memo. Enlighten us, Josh. I bet you don't have an answer.

THIS BOY AIN'T RIGHT!

Let's this $200 aspect straighten up really quick, you cocksucker! There is only one $200 aspect in question here and it's the original one. The only... I repeat... THE ONLY thing that changed with respect to that $200 is that I was authorizing you to do with it as you wish oppose to having it go to a charity. The kind gesture including you and Sonny using it toward a fine dinner.

Do not... I repeat... DO NOT make the mistake of bringing up that there are now two $200 that I'm obligated to pay, for there is clearly only ONE.

Of all the hundred plus times that you been asked about providing FCC proof as it relates to BFL miners, you never replied, but the first motherfuckin' time you saw an opportunity to take the same MF request outta content, you provide proof via a Nexus 7, claiming that that's the screen that you were in reference to.

Now, we're going to have mega-posts about screens. I honestly didn't even know what was meant when you mentioned screen in that infamous November, 2012, post. I honestly thought it had something to do with some component of BFL miners. I only learnt last night that the screen in question was of the forerunner to the Nexus 7, as I'm sure so did many reading those and this post.

I have more to read on the remainder of this thread, thus apologies for not expressing more ire, for I'm saving it up for what I'm sure to be a subsequent post.

When did it become acceptable for COOs of companies to go Full-Dox on people? I missed that memo. Enlighten us, Josh. I bet you don't have an answer.

Yeah, check this out: http://www.canadianmontessori.org/about.html

Click the mail to link on the top.  Guess who's name pops up... and the whois registration for the domain, you guessed it, our friend Darin Bicknell.  Talk about frightening.  He couldn't get approved in Canada (I suspect because of his legal problems) and decided to move somewhere with less stringent laws governing people such as himself coming in contact with children.  I believe his wife is listed as the "owner" of the school, which is probably why he was able to pass a background check to get the place started.  For bonus points, check out his video's on Youtube.  Dude is classic coiled spring waiting to go off.

That weirdo work with children ?!?  
In Asia...yeah...yeah...ok...i have the picture now...