Although the discussion of Lauda’s tag is important in itself, it is not the key issue here. At least as of Loyce’s last scrape, suchmoon was ~Lauda, and had been for some time. It would at least be consistent for suchmoon to both ~nullius and ~Lauda, even if I think it is wrong.
Whereas the issue that suchmoon has been consistently
avoiding is that I supported two negatives (plus the implication of a neutral that said to be “countered”—hereby irrelevant; I assume it was a negative downgraded to neutral). One is Lauda’s. The other is Vod’s. Whereas suchmoon is not only not ~Vod, but positively includes him.
I have
repeatedly said that my position will not change:
suchmoon, go ahead and ~nullius, just as long as you also ~Vod because it’s also his tag that I am supporting.And Vod’s tag is not about trolling.* It is about trust abuse.
(* Actually, I think that Lauda’s tag is about more than trolling as it seems it’s being characterized; but I will set that aside for now.)
Parenthetically, I must note that nutildah’s referenced evidence of trust system abuse by TECSHARE, which I quoted fully above, is in my opinion far stronger than the evidence that nutildah presented against PrimeNumber7’s identity—evidence which suchmoon did not consider to be inadequate. (To avoid a red herring, I emphasize that I am
only comparing evidence by nutildah that was deemed adequate by suchmoon; hilarious’ separate evidence on PN7 is irrelevant in this thread, as is the PN7 issue generally.)
I briefly set forth the above,
yet again, in the hope that the discussion will not continue to be diverted away from this issue.
As the thread stands, it seems the outcome must be a choice between the following:
- suchmoon excludes me for a tag that says on its face that it is supporting two tags, one of which she agrees with—whereas it is clear that I would have made the tag if either Lauda’s trolling-tag or Vod’s trust-abuse tag existed. Excluding me for a tag that you partly agree with, partly disagree with, is not a sound exercise of judgment.
- suchmoon excludes me for a tag that she wholly disagrees with, but fails to exclude both the authors of the tags that I am supporting.
- suchmoon fairly excludes everybody who has made these tags contradicting her standards. I would not argue further with this. I would think it’s wrong; but this is one point where I would simply “agree to disagree”.
- After having been on good terms with me since 2018 without any specific criticism of my tags, suchmoon searches my sent feedback history for new reasons to exclude me in the manner of a prosecutor with a vendetta who decides, “We’ve got to get this guy for something!” I will avoid commenting on how corrupt I think that would be.
a singular rating which you disagree
Definitely not a single rating in nullius' case. At least one other was already mentioned in this thread, and that's just for the last two days. There are 3 or 4 other reds that I consider inappropriate so for me that makes the signal-to-noise ratio bad enough for an exclusion.
Some of these options are mutually exclusive; some may overlap with others. Any which way, I really do not see any other options here; suggestions would be duly appreciated.