Pages:
Author

Topic: Trust System Abuse By Nullius - page 5. (Read 5674 times)

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
February 01, 2020, 05:46:45 PM
Did I imagine you doxing OGNasty and threatening to call the IRS on him Vod?

I have no idea what you imagine - people cannot read other people's minds.

Theymos asks you to forgive and you decide that makes you a doctor?   Idiot.   Cheesy

Did you or did you not dox OGNasty and claim to report him to the IRS?
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
February 04, 2020, 02:35:16 PM
That's great. You are both very assured of yourselves. How about either or preferably both of you substantiate any of your claims, I mean like at all.

Can you substantiate your claim you are a doctor, can tell the future, and read minds?  Idiot.

You know what, time to end this.  Let me clear up the negative trust so you won't complain about it anymore.  Done.  Now the burden of substantiation on each of us is identical.  

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
February 01, 2020, 04:54:47 PM
Did I imagine you doxing OGNasty and threatening to call the IRS on him Vod?

I have no idea what you imagine - people cannot read other people's minds.

Theymos asks you to forgive and you decide that makes you a doctor?   Idiot.   Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
February 04, 2020, 10:24:54 AM
Really, 8 pages of back and forth with most of the circus show by nullius with his outstanding english skills, with having under average knowledge of trust system usage in total.

Any sane person with minimal brain cells would see the ratings in the OP being not based on any trade experience. What an waste of energy really.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
February 01, 2020, 07:39:02 AM
~
TL;DR I am not interested in your conspiracy theories. You are starting to sound like cryptohunter.

As I said, it is not my problem if someone wants to drop IQ to very low levels.

Hey, I have read this part:
[...]because i asked for actual real proof or consistency in DT feedback a couple times. Smiley
I exactly know what you are talking about! I have also asked for proofs dozen times already for various things (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53740266), but seems I am still trust abuser and mob! No proofs ever came! And seems some accounts have been excluded from someone's trust network because of the same thing! Crazy!

7) His most claims are not backed up with any proof, like his claim in this topic for example (I AM STILL WAITING FOR PROOF OF CONNECTION - someone also expressed strong opinion against this in that other thread, nothing about this in this thread, nothing about that in that other thread - DOUBLE STANDARDS!)
7) No one cares/OT
Smiley
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
February 04, 2020, 10:08:51 AM
Hey cryptocunt, you try two hardy notttalky the inglich good.

That statement wasn't directed at you.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
February 01, 2020, 04:03:41 AM
Hey Techy, why are you still abusing your trust against me?  You're an idiot, not a doctor. 

I don't need 500 words - just an answer.  Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51007199

How does Theymos stating it's best to forgive make you an imaginary doctor, idiot?

Stop your trust abuse.  Your jealousy has no place on DT.

 Undecided

Did I imagine you doxing OGNasty and threatening to call the IRS on him Vod?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
February 04, 2020, 08:47:54 AM
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
February 01, 2020, 02:44:23 AM
Hey Techy, why are you still abusing your trust against me?  You're an idiot, not a doctor. 

I don't need 500 words - just an answer.  Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51007199

How does Theymos stating it's best to forgive make you an imaginary doctor, idiot?

Stop your trust abuse.  Your jealousy has no place on DT.

 Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
February 04, 2020, 07:58:32 AM
"suchmoon": 13 times

I'm happy that you found a good outlet for your issues. Every minute spent attacking me leaves you less time to post frivolous red trust so probably a net benefit for the forum.

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
February 03, 2020, 06:43:53 PM
What would you say is the standard of evidence in this case?

TECHSHARE  2019-05-31
Mentally ill stalker who will DOX and report you to government agencies as revenge for criticizing him. Avoid.  (His reference is Theymos asking for forgiveness.)

Techy, will you answer your own question?
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1047
February 01, 2020, 02:23:13 AM
Doxxing over a dispute, I'd rate you myself but i might get banned for that too. .... jokes ... doxx not funny , this thread got long as hell.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
February 04, 2020, 06:24:45 AM
These two are having fun trying to reinforce each other's accusations without actually substantiating anything.

Who, me and Vod?  What, you think we’re just buddies scratching each others’ backs?

For the record, I have exchanged with Vod exactly one private communication between 2018 and the present:  A terse PM that I sent notifying him of this thread, with my apology for my message being about this.  (It felt rude and excessively self-centred, because I had not sent him a hello since I returned from my long absence.)  My communications (or lack thereof) with Vod are none of anybody’s business; but I think I should anyway mention that, for reasons that will presently become clear.

Unlike suchmoon, I did not subsequently attempt lobbying him.  If Vod has stood by his tag, it must only be because, well, it’s his tag, and he made it for reasons that he deemed sound in the first instance.

I supported, and continue to support his tag, because I believe it is correct:  TECSHARE abuses the trust system.  And my respect for Vod is only increased by the fact that he has stood by his own tag, when he could have easily thrown me under the bus to appease suchmoon.  In terms that seem embarrassingly old-fashioned nowadays, he has principles!  And if he refuses to delete a tag to avoid personal inconvenience, that indicates on the flipside that he does not issue tags for personal convenience, either:  Regardless of whether or not one agrees with his standards, he applies his own standards impartially.

Whereas my treatment of this thread changed in the moment that I realized, I am not the one on trial here.

suchmoon has repeatedly evaded the unavoidable syllogism:  If ~nullius, then ~Vod; if not ~Vod, then not ~nullius.

Suddenly searching post hoc for other nullian tags she disagrees with shows that suchmoon started with her conclusion, ~nullius, and then worked backwards to find some means to rationalize it without opposing Vod.  It also shows how petty she is.

Dragging Lauda through the mud on this thread was irrelevant—actually, off-topic.  suchmoon has been ~Lauda for a long time.  ~nullius ~Lauda would at least be consistent—something that I could agree to disagree about, as long as it’s ~nullius ~Lauda ~Vod.  No?  Then leave Lauda out of it, just continue excluding her for whatever reasons or unreasons you had before, and exclude neither me nor Vod.  Any discussion of Lauda’s tag thus is off-topic on this thread, as a moot point that need not be reached beyond the iron logic of the “if ~nullius, then ~Vod; if not ~Vod, then not ~nullius” syllogism.

I focus on suchmoon, because in substantial essence, this is suchmoon’s thread against me straight from post #2.  TECSHARE’s OP is meaningless junk laced with baseless claims that I am “an alt of one of the usual members”—just another mundane daily whine from some idiot, not worth my attention.  I would have ignored TECSHARE, whom I regard as a troll.  I would have ignored anybody who usually supports TECSHARE.  I could not ignore suchmoon.

But suchmoon is not alone in hypocrisy here:  After so many pages of mostly nonsense, I must now also remark on how TECSHARE demonstrates his own hypocrisy by cheering as a big, bad DT1 plays favourites whilst beating up on the little guy.  Ain’t that nice for you, TECSHARE?  This is what you always claim occurs, even when it doesn’t!  Now, it is actually occurring—and you think it’s just fine.  Why don’t you ask suchmoon to stop playing favourites, and treat the “little guy” the same way she treats the awesome 5-digit uid forum legend who founded BPIP?



Actually I do like your true colors. A lot. I prefer honesty whether it's intentional or not.

Well, about that...

[Edit—correction:  The following quoted post by DireWolfM14 was not directed at me.  I misinterpreted it due to some unfortunate coincidences in the context.]
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5374/53741462.html
(Immediately bookmarked by me in anticipation that it may disappear, as it did.)
Hey cryptocunt, you try two hardy notttalky the inglich good.

...also, back atcha:  I am passing judgment on you on this thread, suchmoon.  Not vice versa.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
February 01, 2020, 02:22:32 AM
Hey Techy, why are you still abusing your trust against me?  You're an idiot, not a doctor. 

I don't need 500 words - just an answer.  Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51007199
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
February 01, 2020, 02:17:32 AM
Hey Techy, why are you still abusing your trust against me?  You're an idiot, not a doctor. 

I don't need 500 words - just an answer.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
February 02, 2020, 07:05:59 PM
  • Reasonable (articulable) suspicion:  You have a suspicion which can be clearly explained in reasonable terms.  More than a mere hunch; much more than a guess.  But still no more than a suspicion.
  • Probable cause:  On the face of things (at first sight, “prima facie”), the accused probably did it.
  • Preponderance of the evidence:  Evidence of guilt outweighs evidence of innocence.  Implemented via those balance scales you see carved into statues of blindfolded ladies.  Note:  This requires reasonable thoroughness in loading both sides of the scale, not just stuffing one side and jumping to a conclusion.
  • Clear and convincing evidence:  Evidence of guilt is strong.  Evidence of innocence is weak or nonexistent.
  • Moral certainty, beyond a reasonable doubt:  The only way he didn’t do it is if space aliens did it instead.

What would you say is the standard of evidence in this case? Kind of seems like it would barely qualify for the first one...

Except in this case you have a bunch of people throwing accusations into a hat and taping them together as if they make each other valid like some kind of accusatory Voltron that has more powers when they combine. None of these accusations meet the minimum standard of evidence and they are all referencing back to each other, none of them referencing anything documented or observable that is evidence of anything objectionable whatsoever. Frankly in spite of my low expectations for people in general, I am amazed how many here think this has any substance to it whatsoever when it is literally nothing more than an accusation. All from people with long publicly documented histories of antipathy toward me of course...
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
February 02, 2020, 06:45:06 PM
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
February 02, 2020, 02:48:42 PM
The OLD nullius wont care about these people,something is fishy he might not be the same person this new personality is like a cunt protecting Lauda ang friends.
PGP do you even know what that is you stupid little shitnugget

To rule out the possibility of compromised or relinquished keys, I'm waiting to see how nullius performs in technical discussions. It's curious how he is avoiding them entirely. He seemed quite at home in Development & Technical Discussion originally, yet he has not made a single post there since returning to the forum a month ago. Instead he is injecting himself into all manner of petty reputation disputes, which seems sort of beneath him.

I have also noticed significant discrepancies in speech patterns. Some of the original mannerisms (particularly in terms of text formatting) have been duplicated (or more accurately, exaggerated) but upon deeper inspection, discrepancies begin to emerge.

Persistent display of technical competence (rather than pompous insulting and strong messaging that the use of red trust ought to be drastically expanded) would do much to assuage peoples' suspicions, I'm sure.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
February 02, 2020, 02:16:19 PM
The OLD nullius wont care about these people,something is fishy he might not be the same person this new personality is like a cunt protecting Lauda ang friends.

PGP do you even know what that is you stupid little shitnugget
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
January 31, 2020, 05:05:36 PM
TMAN is more drunk.. TS is still a cunt,. Any more updates?
Pages:
Jump to: