What kind of birdbrained logic do you follow to which you think my disagreement with Vod means that I'm colluding with him?
I didn't know you and I had a disagreement.
digaran seems to be a bit of a loon....
Topic: Trust system abuse / DT2 member Vod is provably dishonestly rating people - page 17. (Read 5846 times)
June 07, 2018, 03:07:39 PM
I didn't know you and I had a disagreement.
digaran seems to be a bit of a loon....
June 07, 2018, 03:00:52 PM
So now Vod has given a positive trust to actmyname because actmyname tried to hide the truth by countering Vod's feedback?
Hide what truth? I have no idea what you are trying to say.I'm disappointed in you man. tagged Vod for colluding with DT2 member actmyname.
What kind of birdbrained logic do you follow to which you think my disagreement with Vod means that I'm colluding with him?Note that actmyname has no past dealings with Anduck
1) You do not know this2) You have no past dealings with me, yet you have sent me feedback.
Vod is also misusing the trust system. therefore my tag on him is valid.
So which one is it? Am I abusing the trust system or is Vod abusing the trust system?
June 07, 2018, 02:39:01 PM
So now Vod has given a positive trust to actmyname because actmyname tried to hide the truth by countering Vod's feedback? I'm disappointed in you man. tagged Vod for colluding with DT2 member actmyname.
Note that actmyname has no past dealings with Anduck, he had no right to counter Vod's feedback, Vod is also misusing the trust system. therefore my tag on him is valid.
Note that actmyname has no past dealings with Anduck, he had no right to counter Vod's feedback, Vod is also misusing the trust system. therefore my tag on him is valid.
June 07, 2018, 11:34:19 AM
I hope you get admin attention on this, bump for visibility
June 07, 2018, 10:58:10 AM
Anyway, I am happy with this. Anduck can continue his Bitcoin development with a 0 trust rating, and I can continue to warn the community he is a scammer and a liar. 
You've presented no evidence, no proof, no source, NOTHING about me having scammed or lied. You are bullshitting in your feedback and in your comments.
Additionally, you've done other pretty untrustworthy shit recently, i.e. threatened/blackmailed me (when I ignored your blackmailing, you proceeded to negatively rate me), fake quote (and claiming someone else faked the quote when everyone sees it was you), intellectual dishonesty in various ways, and the list goes on. Sources: here, here, here and here. (shortly: this thread, thread in Reputation board, and his rating to me)
I can see that you're happy as people still haven't properly realized how dishonest and untrustworthy you are. And I don't even know where else you've been lying your ass off. This is not behavior expected from a DT2 member, or anyone.
June 07, 2018, 02:48:03 AM
I'm waiting for my positive trust from acctmyname. If what he posted was true, he gives positive trust for acting like a child. If both sides are acting the same, why is only one side trustworthy?
Anyway, I am happy with this. Anduck can continue his Bitcoin development with a 0 trust rating, and I can continue to warn the community he is a scammer and a liar.
Anyway, I am happy with this. Anduck can continue his Bitcoin development with a 0 trust rating, and I can continue to warn the community he is a scammer and a liar.
June 07, 2018, 01:37:50 AM
I'm countering the rating. If you have any problems with this you can make your case but the way I see it, both users are acting a bit like children with this retaliatory feedback bullshit.
I owe you a beer
Here, a known criminal owes you a beer for abusing/misusing your DT power. of course we shouldn't expect anything less from criminals. this forum is filled with them and 99.9% of people here are pussies, they fear to lose their garbage posting chances, so they wont say anything, they would keep being the little slavetards that they are just to feed their families. good on you guys.
Now I see that a known criminal has merited actmyname with 8 merits, this merit source is also misusing his source merits like suchmoon. note that actmyname has no past dealing with OP, so one has to wonder, whether actmyname took some money to counter Vod's feedback? maybe this is the case with DT members?
? they would do this just to blackmail people? June 07, 2018, 01:36:43 AM
because you don't know how to use DT power you are holding. this is enough for you to get kicked out from DT2. I will now tag you red for this.
You know you don't need to keep spamming ridiculous statements like this one - it is already abundantly clear from other threads that you have absolutely zero understanding of what the trust system is or how it functions.
June 07, 2018, 01:00:55 AM
I'm countering the rating. If you have any problems with this you can make your case but the way I see it, both users are acting a bit like children with this retaliatory feedback bullshit.
I owe you a beer
June 06, 2018, 07:54:04 PM
actmyname deserve some respect... if I was DT member I should have done this too.
Nothing about respect here, he has made a huge mistake by countering Vod's feedback without having any past deals with OP. if you were a DT member you should get booted off from DT for doing this.
June 06, 2018, 07:44:53 PM
This is the evidence I needed to tag you actmyname, thank you for giving me a valid excuse, you have had no past interactions with OP, why would you do this favor for him? because you don't know how to use DT power you are holding. this is enough for you to get kicked out from DT2. I will now tag you red for this. I could tag Vod but the reason as to why he has tagged OP is valid therefore I'd refrain from tagging Vod.
Seriously man??? Did you even read the feedback from @actmyname?
actmyname deserve some respect... if I was DT member I should have done this too.
Why your glass is always half empty?
June 06, 2018, 07:35:58 PM
Lol. it seems that my trap worked
Give it a rest you fool, your arguments are rubbish and badly-constructed. June 06, 2018, 07:32:24 PM
I'm countering the rating. If you have any problems with this you can make your case but the way I see it, both users are acting a bit like children with this retaliatory feedback bullshit.
Lol. it seems that my trap worked. why did you counter Vod's feedback? now OP only has the look of a trustworthy person on his profile, nothing has changed in reality. Vod has abused his DT status by tagging the OP for something from the past. you are countering Vod's feedback just to hide the truth.
This is the evidence I needed to tag you actmyname, thank you for giving me a valid excuse, you have had no past interactions with OP, why would you do this favor for him? because you don't know how to use DT power you are holding. this is enough for you to get kicked out from DT2. I will now tag you red for this. I could tag Vod but the reason as to why he has tagged OP is valid therefore I'd refrain from tagging Vod.
June 06, 2018, 07:00:31 PM
I'm countering the rating.
Excellent. Now maybe this bozo will stop harassing me.
I can see him in a bar, hitting on the same woman all night until the bouncers kick him out lol...
June 06, 2018, 06:40:15 PM
I'm countering the rating. If you have any problems with this you can make your case but the way I see it, both users are acting a bit like children with this retaliatory feedback bullshit.
June 06, 2018, 05:25:48 PM
You should run for politics man. You are great at skewing reality and making up shit.
June 06, 2018, 05:20:57 PM
e.g. fake quote
It was actually this person that made the fake quote.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39391773
I quoted it before I realized he was just making a suggestion. I have edited my post and I apologize again.
I see. You didn't quote me at all. You had edited the quote fraudulently to be from me, which was *your* edit -- not done by anyone else. What you "quoted" was never available as is, so you did made the edit yourself to make it show like I had said it. I had not posted what you quoted to be said by me. (Except in a quote, too, which shows clearly who I quoted.) Another case of you being intellectually dishonest! Thanks for apologizing, though. This is the first time I see you apologize for this fake quote you did. You still have post(s) where you do "conclusions" based on this fake quote of yours.
The one whose quote you took and edited to be said by me wasn't "fake quoting" anyone. He didn't attribute the text in the quote tags to anyone -- he didn't mark that its said by someone when it wasn't. So he did not make a fake quote like you claim. Stop lying.
It would be nice if you would at least quote the whole sentence if you're going to quote. Whatever, really.
June 06, 2018, 05:01:33 PM
e.g. fake quote
It was actually this person that made the fake quote.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39391773
I quoted it before I realized he was just making a suggestion. I have edited my post and I apologize again.
I did a mistake
See? It happens to all of us.
June 06, 2018, 05:01:07 PM
you both exercised your freedom of speech.
You are clueless about freedom of anything. between OP and Vod, only Vod's exercise of free speech has any meaningful weight. OP's means jack, it doesn't matter what OP says, according to DT made up rules DT members are always right and others are not.
June 06, 2018, 04:33:50 PM
About my rating being retaliatory:
Initially, Vod said bunch of untrustworthy stuff, like called me a scammer when I had not scammed anyone. I rated you, Vod, because of that, just like my rating reason states. It's perfectly valid and not placed because of your rating itself. I simply can't trust people who call me a scammer when I've not scammed anyone. Later I've thought maybe I could've let it slide, but back then I chose to announce it to the world by rating you negatively. It turned out that you're more than just an untrustworthy person.
Initially, Vod said bunch of untrustworthy stuff, like called me a scammer when I had not scammed anyone. I rated you, Vod, because of that, just like my rating reason states. It's perfectly valid and not placed because of your rating itself. I simply can't trust people who call me a scammer when I've not scammed anyone. Later I've thought maybe I could've let it slide, but back then I chose to announce it to the world by rating you negatively. It turned out that you're more than just an untrustworthy person.
Vod claims you're untrustworthy because you bid on your own auction.
You claim Vod is untrustworthy because of unpleasant things said to you.
Let's say I ignore your flexible moral backbone for a minute and assume that your feedback is not retaliatory. The best interpretation I can come up with is that you both exercised your freedom of speech.
Jump to: