Pages:
Author

Topic: Trust system abuse / DT2 member Vod is provably dishonestly rating people - page 13. (Read 5846 times)

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
Do that remove it and I will remove my tag on you because I only tagged you for misusing the trust system, it's not about limitation, you are not supposed to do this kind of thing.

Image loading...

Mind providing a source that states that I am not supposed to leave counter feedbacks if one is already left? I'd be happy to remove it as soon as you provide a reputable citation. (from theymos or another admin)

you didn't counter Vod's feedback man you tagged Anduck with green and for what? what did Anduck do to deserve the green tag from you?

Anduck got negative trust from Vod to deserve the green rating from me. They did not appear to intend to deceive, and Vod seemed to have wanted to trade rating removal with Anduck.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
And where is it stated/implied that you are limited to one counter feedback per account? (I'll remove it if this is the case, however I do not know of any limitation)

Do that remove it and I will remove my tag on you because I only tagged you for misusing the trust system, it's not about limitation, you are not supposed to do this kind of thing. you didn't counter Vod's feedback man you tagged Anduck with green and for what? what did Anduck do to deserve the green tag from you?

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
DarkStar_ comes here and is not even countering any body's feedback, he just hands out a positive feedback for somebody Vod considers as scammer.

Try reading.

Quote
This feedback also serves as a counter to Vod's. While Anduck has made a questionable decision, the rating from Vod does seem retaliatory (Anduck is not exempt from this either).

Therefore, I would recommend that you ignore both this trust rating, and Vod's trust rating.

No you didn't counter Vod's feedback because actmyname already did countered his rating on Anduck. is this the kind of accurate feedback people are supposed to leave on others in order to get on DT2?

And where is it stated/implied that you are limited to one counter feedback per account? (I'll remove it if this is the case, however I do not know of any limitation)
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
DarkStar_ comes here and is not even countering any body's feedback, he just hands out a positive feedback for somebody Vod considers as scammer.

Try reading.

Quote
This feedback also serves as a counter to Vod's. While Anduck has made a questionable decision, the rating from Vod does seem retaliatory (Anduck is not exempt from this either).

Therefore, I would recommend that you ignore both this trust rating, and Vod's trust rating.

No you didn't counter Vod's feedback because actmyname already did countered his rating on Anduck. is this the kind of accurate feedback people are supposed to leave on others in order to get on DT2?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
Currently people can place any feedback they like - some of it is blatantly untrue.  It would be good if we were able to put a comment under any feedback.

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
DarkStar_ comes here and is not even countering any body's feedback, he just hands out a positive feedback for somebody Vod considers as scammer.

Try reading.

Quote
This feedback also serves as a counter to Vod's. While Anduck has made a questionable decision, the rating from Vod does seem retaliatory (Anduck is not exempt from this either).

Therefore, I would recommend that you ignore both this trust rating, and Vod's trust rating.
member
Activity: 486
Merit: 27
HIRE ME FOR SMALL TASK
Vod literally said

Wrong.  I don't speak when I type.  :/

Savage vod level 9999. Checkmate. 
Vod +1 / digaran 0 hahaha can't stop laughing 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Vod literally said

Wrong.  I don't speak when I type.  :/
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
Let me make a new point here.
According to Vod, Anduck is a scammer, correct? OK.
Actmyname counters Vod's feedback to give a free pass to a scammer, actmyname literally said: here scammer Anduck, receive this positive trust and go on scamming people with ease, don't worry about Vod's negative feedback because I just countered it so that you could keep scamming people.

Now what is the reaction of Vod? yes he goes and leaves a positive trust for actmyname, Vod literally said: here actmyname have this positive trust because you just gave a free pass to somebody I consider as scammer. then DarkStar_ comes here and is not even countering any body's feedback, he just hands out a positive feedback for somebody Vod considers as scammer. what is Vod's reaction here? yes he goes and counters DarkStar_'s feedback just to say that Anduck is still a scammer.

They are misusing the trust system left and right and they will continue to do so unless they are kicked out from DT2.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I believe Vod's claim that you are lying stems from what was likely you misspeaking a single time

What misspeaking?
After rereading your previous thread, I will retract that statement. My statement stems from an issue that you cleared up here.
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
I believe Vod's claim that you are lying stems from what was likely you misspeaking a single time

What misspeaking?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Vod blackmailed me and lies in his ratings
How did Vod blackmail you? What did he ask for? What is he lying about?

Blackmailing/threatening: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39457664 (Source in PM conv. here)

As you can see, he told me he will have to negatively me if I did not change my rating to neutral. That's threatening/blackmailing.
After reading the entire PM conversation, I would agree that Vod was abusing his position on DT in order to entice you to remove the rating that you had at the time against him. The question of if this rises to extortion or not, I am not sure, however unfortunately when you are in power around here, not very much will happen to you after you extort someone.

I can't support the activity that was the root cause of this dispute, and others in the past have received multiple negative ratings for similar activity. On the other hand, I don't support the public lynching of members after making a single mistake, especially after they have made the relevant parties whole (it is my understanding this has not happened in your case).

I believe Vod's claim that you are lying stems from what was likely you misspeaking a single time, and probably does not fall into the category of being dishonest. Based upon the fact that Vod was previously asking for you to remove your negative with the threat of leaving a negative rating himself, I would question the legitimacy of the claim that Vod "distrusts" you, although I disagree with this standard to leave a negative rating.

I would suggest you contact dooglus, Cryus and HostFat about your concerns, and ideally they will remove Vod from their trust lists.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
...

Endless meta discussion incoming? Intellectual dishonesty is the thing of this time. Btw, you're inflating "lying" by claiming nearly anything said nearly anywhere is a lie.

You're lying again. Not "nearly anything said nearly anywhere". Just the things that are said with intent to deceive.

P.S. suchmoon, I am not concerned about your reputation. I only said you're losing it. You can go and show everyone how foolish you are.

You're the one who brought it up though. If that was not a genuine concern then it probably was "nonsense & derailing meta shit". Don't do that.
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
...

Endless meta discussion incoming? Intellectual dishonesty is the thing of this time. Btw, you're inflating "lying" by claiming nearly anything said nearly anywhere is a lie.

I hope people who are reading these discussions have brains attached. ...  Wink

Let's try to stay on topic: abuse done by DT member Vod, and what to do about it and other DT / trust system problems. You don't need to participate if you're going to keep spouting nonsense & derailing meta shit.

P.S. suchmoon, I am not concerned about your reputation. I only said you're losing it. You can go and show everyone how foolish you are.
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
Vod blackmailed me and lies in his ratings
How did Vod blackmail you? What did he ask for? What is he lying about?

Blackmailing/threatening: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39457664 (Source in PM conv. here)

As you can see, he told me he will have to negatively me if I did not change my rating to neutral. That's threatening/blackmailing.

Vod is lying about me having scammed an auction. Vod is lying about me "admitting to lying". Vod faked a quote to be from me. Vod is lying about who faked that quote (he did it himself, as everyone can see.., but claims that someone else faked it and he just fell for it.)

Some pointers to some of his lies and other dishonesty: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39447493

You can also simply see how he has rated me. He is lying in his ratings. I've not scammed anyone, have not lied about anything, and have not "admitted to lying" etc. Read this thread please, otherwise you won't have clear picture of what's going on. You need to verify these things yourself in these kind of cases.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I agree: Vod has the right to not trust me. I also have the right to not trust him. It's not OK to blackmail and lie in ratings. Vod blackmailed me and lies in his ratings. You could verify this, but naturally you won't.

I did verify this and don't agree with your conclusion. "naturally you won't" is a lie.

Vod is doing many sorts of disgusting and dishonest things here. I am defending myself from this abuse done by Vod. I've not scammed anyone. I've not lied. Vod blackmailed me. Vod lies about me. You, suchmoon, are questioning everyone here except Vod. Vod is provably dishonest with his constant lies and therefore untrustworthy.

You have lied multiple times, including TO ME ABOUT ME***, which is one of the stupidest kinds of lies you can come up with since you know that I know that you're lying. And again, I disagree with your conclusion on Vod's actions.

As you can see, you're looking at this through rose-coloured Vod-glasses. I've not scammed or lied. It is not OK for Vod to rate me negatively while presenting lies as the reason. Nobody can show where I've done anything dishonest, scammed, lied and so on. Deem Vod (or anyone) to present any evidence of me scamming or lying.  I've presented evidence and proof of my claims about Vod. It's all linked or present in this thread, and quoted to prevent Vod from editing or deleting the history.

Bidding on your own auction can be considered dishonest. Lying to my virtual forum face is definitely dishonest. That leads me to believe (the following is an opinion in case you're wondering) that you're probably not quite honest in the rest of this debate either.

Suchmoon. It's sad that you whine about others all the time while completely ignoring Vod and his dirty dishonesty. He's the provably dishonest one here. I see this clearly sided take by yours as defending Vod. Granted, it could be that you just don't understand. And yes, you're entitled to do what you're doing here, but I'm telling you it's hurting your reputation. I hope you'd be reasonable, though.

Thank you for your false concern about my reputation. Me disagreeing with you doesn't mean any of those other things that you're making up.

I don't accuse you of anything. I'm sorry if you feel offended. I simply asked you questions.

I'm fully familiar with the loaded question fallacy. Let me try:

I wonder why you're so butthurt about my comments towards you? Are you maybe in control of some other accounts, like one that starts with "cyber" and ends with "pinoy"? Or maybe one that starts with "Homero" and ends with "Garza"? When are you going to return the 128 BTC and 40000 BTC respectively to all those scammed victims?

I'm just asking questions. You don't need to answer to them. I don't ask you to agree with me, either.

Anyway, after reading what you say in that quote, I find you intellectually dishonest. I strongly think that you should know better by now. I don't know if people genuinely don't understand when they're doing shit like that. You can fool many by doing that, though. People should be better...

I find you genuinely adorable in how you think your fallacious arguments can fool anyone.



*** I consider your incessant use of fallacies intentional and I will therefore refer to it as lying. Feel free to correct me by admitting that you were simply mistaken in your reasoning.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Vod blackmailed me and lies in his ratings
How did Vod blackmail you? What did he ask for? What is he lying about?
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
I don't defend Vod nor do I think that he needs my defense. Not even sure what I'm supposed to be defending him from. I just happen to think that Vod has the right to not trust you.

OK.

I agree: Vod has the right to not trust me. I also have the right to not trust him. It's not OK to blackmail and lie in ratings. Vod blackmailed me and lies in his ratings. You could verify this, but naturally you won't.

Vod is doing many sorts of disgusting and dishonest things here. I am defending myself from this abuse done by Vod. I've not scammed anyone. I've not lied. Vod blackmailed me. Vod lies about me. You, suchmoon, are questioning everyone here except Vod. Vod is provably dishonest with his constant lies and therefore untrustworthy.

As you can see, you're looking at this through rose-coloured Vod-glasses. I've not scammed or lied. It is not OK for Vod to rate me negatively while presenting lies as the reason. Nobody can show where I've done anything dishonest, scammed, lied and so on. Deem Vod (or anyone) to present any evidence of me scamming or lying.  I've presented evidence and proof of my claims about Vod. It's all linked or present in this thread, and quoted to prevent Vod from editing or deleting the history.

Suchmoon. It's sad that you whine about others all the time while completely ignoring Vod and his dirty dishonesty. He's the provably dishonest one here. I see this clearly sided take by yours as defending Vod. Granted, it could be that you just don't understand. And yes, you're entitled to do what you're doing here, but I'm telling you it's hurting your reputation. I hope you'd be reasonable, though.


Funny how you moan about "bullshit without source/proof/evidence" and then you proceed to accuse me of bullshit without source/proof/evidence. Are you familiar with the concept of a glass house? Seems like anyone not agreeing with you is automatically dishonest and when you're short on facts you start peddling your fallacies as facts.

I don't accuse you of anything. I'm sorry if you feel offended. I simply asked you questions. You don't need to answer to them. I don't ask you to agree with me, either. I am not short on facts. I am very full of facts, actually. Smiley

Anyway, after reading what you say in that quote, I find you intellectually dishonest. I strongly think that you should know better by now. I don't know if people genuinely don't understand when they're doing shit like that. You can fool many by doing that, though. People should be better...

Everyone: Please carefully read this thread to find out what's going on. Don't trust, verify.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Funny how you moan about "bullshit without source/proof/evidence" and then you proceed to accuse me of bullshit without source/proof/evidence. Are you familiar with the concept of a glass house? Seems like anyone not agreeing with you is automatically dishonest and when you're short on facts you start peddling your fallacies as facts.

Are you implying that Vod(the pedo) is not entitled to provide evidence in order to deface someone else's reputation?

Dude, it is not cool to use children to advance your agenda...

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Are you implying that Vod(the pedo) is not entitled to provide evidence in order to deface someone else's reputation?

I think Vod meets and exceeds your and Anduck's standards of evidence. Innuendo is not evidence.
Pages:
Jump to: