Two interesting emails I received today... - page 6.

Raoul Duke

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1002

Quote from: nanaimogold on August 30, 2011, 01:50:22 PM

You are so full of shit. You twist what I say to fit you own agenda. At no point have I ever changed my mind or backed up on my opinion of that Mallick gang. I take nothing back and never did. Some moderator closed that thread before I could reply.

You are a sneaky word wanker. You even misspell nanaimogold and paxum to avoid people finding this nonsense with google.

U mad bro? Maybe because people have more evidence that connects you with the MyBitcoin Scam than you have against the ones you accuse?

If you are really that aggravated because of someone falsely accusing you, then you should be the first to hold back your horses before accusing others without evidence.

indio007

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

nanaimogold,
Why don't you disclose the fact that adoption of bitcoin as the de facto digital currency destroys your business?

Your self-interest destroys any credibility you might have about bitcoin considering your financial interest is diametrically opposed to it.

nanaimogold

sr. member

Activity: 661

Merit: 251

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:06:48 PM

I want to point out that Nanaimagold and his multinicks did EXACTLY the same they are doing here with Bruce Wagner, but with Praxum. They cite forum posts attributing words that are not theirs to the people they are trying to slander, and when the deception is pointed out they change subject, trying to get people to ignore the fact that they are presenting false proof and trying to keep the pressure in the person they are attacking.

You can check how he did the same here with Praxum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tradehill-we-now-support-deposits-and-withdrawals-of-funds-via-paxum-32604 (fun starts at page 3). At the end there are always lots of accusations and noise, but absolutely no proof. Same "modus operandis".

You are so full of shit. You twist what I say to fit you own agenda. At no point have I ever changed my mind or backed up on my opinion of that Mallick gang. I take nothing back and never did. Some moderator closed that thread before I could reply.

You are a sneaky word wanker. You even misspell nanaimogold and paxum to avoid people finding this nonsense with google.

bitrebel

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 251

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 01:37:11 PM

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 01:01:16 PM

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Bruce was raging against the fact that having sex with someone under the age of consent in his country is illegal.

No he wasn't. He was speaking to the hypocrisy of drawing an artificial line in the sand between having sex with someone who is 17 years 11 months and 29 days old, versus that same person the following morning.

I can understand that you may find the difference between the two subtle, but if you were to make that argument in court you'd get lashed pretty quickly by any judge worth his or her salt.

While the judge is fucking his children and his maid and jacking off under the table with a wet sock.

norulezapply

hero member

Activity: 481

Merit: 502

True or not, everything in this entire thread is disgusting (MyBitcoin, Pattaya and the other allegations).
Is there no moderation at all on this forum?

Regardless, this is a major scar to this forum if anything. If the media pick up on all of this shit it's going to be yet another huge blow to the PR effort of bitcoin and we'll be yet another huge leap away from bitcoin being viewed as a successful currency.
I think whether it's true or not, Bruce should probably put a halt to the bitcoin show as it's only going to harm the community further, which is sad that it's came down to this as the bitcoin show was one of a kind really, even if some people did dislike it. And also the MyBitcoin suspects should be persued however possible and not forgotton.

Hopefully this doesn't hurt bitcoin as badly as I'm expecting.

Piper67

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 01:01:16 PM

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Bruce was raging against the fact that having sex with someone under the age of consent in his country is illegal.

No he wasn't. He was speaking to the hypocrisy of drawing an artificial line in the sand between having sex with someone who is 17 years 11 months and 29 days old, versus that same person the following morning.

I can understand that you may find the difference between the two subtle, but if you were to make that argument in court you'd get lashed pretty quickly by any judge worth his or her salt.

Jalum

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Look ARROUND!

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 01:18:13 PM

And you are not going to get it because given my post its obvious what I was trying to say (and also you can guess my position). I wont play stupid rethoric games.

So I'm going to guess that you have a problem with someone in your country having sex with someone below the legal age of consent, yes?

So do we in America.

hugolp

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1001

Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 01:01:16 PM

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Bruce was raging against the fact that having sex with someone under the age of consent in his country is illegal.

I wanted the Spanish person's opinion of people who have sex with someone under the age of consent in their country.

And you are not going to get it because given my post its obvious what I was trying to say (and also you can guess my position). I wont play stupid rethoric games.

Jalum

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Look ARROUND!

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Bruce was raging against the fact that having sex with someone under the age of consent in his country is illegal.

I wanted the Spanish person's opinion of people who have sex with someone under the age of consent in their country.

JeffK

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

I never hashed for this...

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:54:31 PM

Quote from: JeffK on August 30, 2011, 12:52:04 PM

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 12:48:27 PM

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously).

And your views on someone having sex with a 13 year old?

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Unfortunately, added in with all the rest of his commentary on sex with young people, it looks pretty bad.

Nope, not really. The two are separate and the only thing linking them is innuendo and rumour. Still a witch hunt. Still unbecoming of a mature and sophisticated online community... which this clearly appears not to be Cheesy

Sorry, but if I have a clue abuse could be happening and I don't at least clue people into it, I am a bad person

Piper67

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1001

Quote from: JeffK on August 30, 2011, 12:52:04 PM

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 12:48:27 PM

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously).

And your views on someone having sex with a 13 year old?

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Unfortunately, added in with all the rest of his commentary on sex with young people, it looks pretty bad.

Nope, not really. The two are separate and the only thing linking them is innuendo and rumour. Still a witch hunt. Still unbecoming of a mature and sophisticated online community... which this clearly appears not to be Cheesy

JeffK

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

I never hashed for this...

Quote from: Piper67 on August 30, 2011, 12:51:06 PM

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 12:48:27 PM

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously).

And your views on someone having sex with a 13 year old?

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

Unfortunately, added in with all the rest of his commentary on sex with young people, it looks pretty bad.

Piper67

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Jalum on August 30, 2011, 12:48:27 PM

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously).

And your views on someone having sex with a 13 year old?

The point is that Bruce isn't advocating having sex with a 13 year old. He's complaining about the hypocrisy of age of consent laws in the US, which is a position many of us will actually agree with.

BlockHash

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 100

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

Quote from: JeffK on August 30, 2011, 12:35:54 PM

Where do we draw the lines? Poor child molestors molesting people younger than 18 and being labeled a child molestor forever! A bloo bloo bloo

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously). Most of the world except the USA has more lax laws regarding under-18 years old and sex. So you are going to find lots of people in the world, a big majority, that thinks that USA laws are stupid, including me. There is nothing exceptional on what Bruce is saying.

When I was 17 I started dating a 16 year old girl. When I was 18 and she was 17 we were still dating and having sex. It was my first important relation and one that me (and I believe her as well) will remember forever. Under USA law I would have been a criminal. Its stupid to ruin first rIelationships and put pressure on teens because of stupid laws.

I agree to a point. Someone getting bagged on a statutory charge at 18 when their partner is 16/17 is ridiculous. I'm even willing to expand those numbers a bit either direction because of the absurdity of the broad interpretation of the law.

I do think it's another thing entirely when there is a great deal of age or other factors (such as coercion from a person in relative power) involved.

Jalum

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Look ARROUND!

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously).

And your views on someone having sex with a 13 year old?

edd

donator

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1002

Quote from: hugolp on August 30, 2011, 12:45:00 PM

When I was 17 I started dating a 16 year old girl. When I was 18 and she was 17 we were still dating and having sex. It was my first important relation and one that me (and I believe her as well) will remember forever. Under USA law I would have been a criminal. Its stupid to ruin first relationships and put pressure on teens because of stupid laws.

I believe there is an exception if the age difference is less than two years.

hugolp

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1001

Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol

Quote from: JeffK on August 30, 2011, 12:35:54 PM

Where do we draw the lines? Poor child molestors molesting people younger than 18 and being labeled a child molestor forever! A bloo bloo bloo

Watch out with that. There is a lot of people that disagree with the USA laws regarding minors and sex. In my country, Spain, the law states that its legal for a 14 year old person to have sex with and adult (consensual obviously). Most of the world except the USA has more lax laws regarding under-18 years old and sex. So you are going to find lots of people in the world, a big majority, that thinks that USA laws are stupid, including me. There is nothing exceptional on what Bruce is saying.

When I was 17 I started dating a 16 year old girl. When I was 18 and she was 17 we were still dating and having sex. It was my first important relation and one that me (and I believe her as well) will remember forever. Under USA law I would have been a criminal. Its stupid to ruin first relationships and put pressure on teens because of stupid laws.

BlockHash

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 100

Jalum

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Look ARROUND!

Bruce claims...that only the...first paragraph is his content...despite the THREE PRONGED attack text...sharing his prolific use of...ellipses.

Remember, if you're a man then you're a rape machine that cannot control your urges, and that the blame for your actions lie on those around you. Now, if you were hypothetically engaged in some rather abhorrent behavior, wouldn't it be convenient if you ascribed to a belief that absolved you of what you've done? Like, it wasn't your fault because they deserved it by wearing those [hot pants/candy bracelets/Huggies].

rainingbitcoins

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 252

SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE

Quote from: JeffK on August 30, 2011, 12:29:40 PM

Also, the second creepy post looks like your classic, elipsis and period filled diatribes

Not to mention the random WORDS in caps here AND there.

And with the post he's quoting right there for all to see, that's some real bush league dishonesty, Bruce. You must not think much of people around here to try and pull something that transparent.

Topic: Two interesting emails I received today... - page 6. (Read 16427 times)