As each new technology makes sports management more perfect and easier, I think there is a lot of criticism of that technology. Video Assistant Refereeing has been a great technology for football as it can accurately tell if a goal is well scored or if the referee is off site correctly but we have also seen many criticisms of this technology. Yes some controversial decisions have come from this technology but most of the decisions made football easier to manage. If the technologists bring any new technology instead of this technology then that technology will definitely be updated but there is no guarantee that that technology will give hundred percent correct decision. As technology advances so does the debate.
VAR is one technology that changed football wholly when it got introduced, It aided proper decision making. Twas a revolution that was proper because normally the world evolves in technology, even as the evolution occurs, every aspect imbedded in this world should evolve too, at the beginning there was a tangible percentage of accuracy but in games, weeks and months, the accuracy range dropped, errors started being welcomed, technical and human errors which normally is no ones fault.The errors tended to cause grievances between the fans and the match officials. We should note that for every innovation of man, there's no guaranteed perfection, there's although a warranty and once the period of the warranty elapses, then most definitely, we should expect any new development from this innovation, this reason makes for the continuous upgrade and update of the VAR system because of not, the discrepancies will get increased to a point of no fixing and then, it may see to the strategical end of it, the VAR is one technology that'd continue to be much useful and that's why we have a task of boosting up it's quality as the world moves technologically, we won't want to have an out of date system used in our games. It won't deliver as it ought to.
