[Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 211.

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: primouno on October 31, 2014, 08:04:15 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 04:57:00 PM

Quote from: Grim on October 30, 2014, 11:57:41 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 11:09:44 AM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 30, 2014, 10:44:59 AM

750TI hashrate ?

With CudaMiner, around 3-3.3 khash on NF14 Scrypt-Jane, with the right settings (Lookup Gap 4 + autotune). Without lookup gap you'll probably see something around 2.7-2.8 at stock clocks.

ah k, I thought your newly compiled cudaminer would give maxwell chips a boost but not for the 750ti it seems. (only 970/980)
(old miner gave me 3.3khash as well)

It's good to hear that it helped with the 970. I'll probably attempt a compute52 compile for 970/980 cards against cuda 6.5 to check for any more gains there. You lose compute10 going to 6.5, but anymore that's not really much of a loss. I don't think that the kernels have been really optimized for Maxwell, but there might be some improvement.

Whenever I use auto, cudaminer crashes after some time, I don't know how to make it work. Do I have to set scrypt-jane:14 or leave it? I tried to use your settings with debug switch but it crushed :/ I have one 750ti from Gigabyte.

Thanks for calling that out. "-a scrypt-jane:14" needs to be in there too.

Valpe

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 100

Quote from: primouno on October 31, 2014, 08:04:15 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 04:57:00 PM

Quote from: Grim on October 30, 2014, 11:57:41 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 11:09:44 AM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 30, 2014, 10:44:59 AM

750TI hashrate ?

With CudaMiner, around 3-3.3 khash on NF14 Scrypt-Jane, with the right settings (Lookup Gap 4 + autotune). Without lookup gap you'll probably see something around 2.7-2.8 at stock clocks.

ah k, I thought your newly compiled cudaminer would give maxwell chips a boost but not for the 750ti it seems. (only 970/980)
(old miner gave me 3.3khash as well)

It's good to hear that it helped with the 970. I'll probably attempt a compute52 compile for 970/980 cards against cuda 6.5 to check for any more gains there. You lose compute10 going to 6.5, but anymore that's not really much of a loss. I don't think that the kernels have been really optimized for Maxwell, but there might be some improvement.

Whenever I use auto, cudaminer crashes after some time, I don't know how to make it work. Do I have to set scrypt-jane:14 or leave it? I tried to use your settings with debug switch but it crushed :/ I have one 750ti from Gigabyte.

I have same problem.

volyova

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: thaitunhi1606 on October 31, 2014, 09:41:07 AM

UTC 's price is dump and dump. Maybe it 'll die again. T.T

You definitely will.

thaitunhi1606

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

UTC 's price is dump and dump. Maybe it 'll die again. T.T

primouno

sr. member

Activity: 251

Merit: 250

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 04:57:00 PM

Quote from: Grim on October 30, 2014, 11:57:41 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 11:09:44 AM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 30, 2014, 10:44:59 AM

750TI hashrate ?

With CudaMiner, around 3-3.3 khash on NF14 Scrypt-Jane, with the right settings (Lookup Gap 4 + autotune). Without lookup gap you'll probably see something around 2.7-2.8 at stock clocks.

ah k, I thought your newly compiled cudaminer would give maxwell chips a boost but not for the 750ti it seems. (only 970/980)
(old miner gave me 3.3khash as well)

It's good to hear that it helped with the 970. I'll probably attempt a compute52 compile for 970/980 cards against cuda 6.5 to check for any more gains there. You lose compute10 going to 6.5, but anymore that's not really much of a loss. I don't think that the kernels have been really optimized for Maxwell, but there might be some improvement.

Whenever I use auto, cudaminer crashes after some time, I don't know how to make it work. Do I have to set scrypt-jane:14 or leave it? I tried to use your settings with debug switch but it crushed :/ I have one 750ti from Gigabyte.

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: Grim on October 30, 2014, 11:57:41 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 11:09:44 AM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 30, 2014, 10:44:59 AM

750TI hashrate ?

With CudaMiner, around 3-3.3 khash on NF14 Scrypt-Jane, with the right settings (Lookup Gap 4 + autotune). Without lookup gap you'll probably see something around 2.7-2.8 at stock clocks.

ah k, I thought your newly compiled cudaminer would give maxwell chips a boost but not for the 750ti it seems. (only 970/980)
(old miner gave me 3.3khash as well)

It's good to hear that it helped with the 970. I'll probably attempt a compute52 compile for 970/980 cards against cuda 6.5 to check for any more gains there. You lose compute10 going to 6.5, but anymore that's not really much of a loss. I don't think that the kernels have been really optimized for Maxwell, but there might be some improvement.

Grim

sr. member

Activity: 506

Merit: 252

Quote from: Kracko on October 30, 2014, 11:09:44 AM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 30, 2014, 10:44:59 AM

750TI hashrate ?

With CudaMiner, around 3-3.3 khash on NF14 Scrypt-Jane, with the right settings (Lookup Gap 4 + autotune). Without lookup gap you'll probably see something around 2.7-2.8 at stock clocks.

ah k, I thought your newly compiled cudaminer would give maxwell chips a boost but not for the 750ti it seems. (only 970/980)
(old miner gave me 3.3khash as well)

tsjaar

full member

Activity: 135

Merit: 100

Check the dumps @CT.... glad I got some, but could this be some mintpal UTC's being dumped .... ? Huh

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: mitache365 on October 30, 2014, 10:44:59 AM

750TI hashrate ?

With CudaMiner, around 3-3.3 khash on NF14 Scrypt-Jane, with the right settings (Lookup Gap 4 + autotune). Without lookup gap you'll probably see something around 2.7-2.8 at stock clocks.

mitache365

hero member

Activity: 732

Merit: 500

750TI hashrate ?

Thirtybird

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: Kracko on October 29, 2014, 03:50:05 PM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 29, 2014, 01:31:52 PM

Quote from: Kracko on October 29, 2014, 12:59:28 PM

Quote from: mitache365 on October 29, 2014, 10:50:57 AM

Hi. I want to ask with 3x280x rig witch port I need to use. with static 1diff or this witch is vardiff, with a minimum 1 ? thanks!

On http://utc.tumblingblock.com, if you are using yacminer either 3339 (vardiff, min 1) or 5555 (static diff 1) would work for you. I would probably go with the static diff port for yacminer.

I dont understand the difference with that difficulty.

The variable difficulty minimum cannot go below 1 on port 3339, but it can rise in difficulty for faster hardware, usually not much more than 5 with my 750ti rigs. The static difficulty port 5555 always keeps a difficulty of 1.

+1 for the static diff port - I have had better results with that compared to vardiff. I'm not sure if it's because of dumb luck or if it's because the vardiff server can set a non-integer difficulty (i.e. "4.312342") as the target. Either way, diff 1 is just fine.

PaulR1

sr. member

Activity: 320

Merit: 250

Quote from: Levole11 on October 29, 2014, 06:33:20 PM

Quote from: PaulR1 on October 29, 2014, 05:42:14 PM

Quote from: Official Ultracoin Team on October 29, 2014, 01:09:04 PM

Amazing news from the UTC management

Steven (Rapture333) has done a very big job for UTC and is tremendously dedicated to UTC for months.
Now we would like to promote Steven for his great job and dedication.

At this moment we want to give Stevan, from of today, full control in the UTC management as General Director.

Paul and Fabietech, offcource, are still here but Steven will be the new General Director of the UTC management team and he will be leading the team as from now.

With Steven as our new management leader we believe he will bring UTC to even higher levels. There are some WONDERFULL and AMAZING things happening behind the scenes what Steven will tell you about in detail as soon as possbile!

Regards,
UTC Management Team
Paulr, Fabietech and Steven.

Steven, cheers Mate....
You earned that position of General Director in the management team !

what does this mean for your position Paul?

Hi Levolle,
our team stay's strong and we are weekly or daily (when necessarily) in contact with each other.
Fabietech and me are still in the management team and stay as co-leaders.
My role in the past was already in the back ground with making plans and making (some) decisions.
Of cours the most decisions we made together as a team.
Steven will be now leading the team as General Director and gets the daily control of the team with a large part of decision freedom.
Fabietech and me are still in the management team, we will work for UTC and we will help Steven at the more bigger or difficult decisions for UTC.
So we are not leaving UTC.

Greetings,
Paul.

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: Grim on October 30, 2014, 07:12:15 AM

Quote from: Kracko on October 29, 2014, 09:51:38 PM

Quote from: Namsbreh on October 29, 2014, 04:34:25 PM

Quote from: Kracko on October 28, 2014, 10:46:32 PM

I just got my 970. Gigabyte GV-N970WF30C0-4GD.

I was getting 8.8-9kh/s in Windows 7 with:

Code:

--algo=scrypt-jane:14 -L 4 -i 1 -l t64x4 -C 1

I haven't tried higher lookup gaps yet.

Which miner you using pls?

I've only managed to get 6.5kh/s so far.

https://github.com/cbuchner1/CudaMiner.git

If you can compile it yourself, I strongly urge doing it. There are several dependencies that you need, but it really isn't that bad. I added compute50/sm50 support as well for Maxwell cards. It is built with Visual Studio 2010 against the Cuda 6.0 library. If you'd rather have a pre-compiled binary here's what I'm using on my Windows machines:

http://utc.tumblingblock.com/cudaminer_cm10_50.zip

MD5Sums

Code:

6614a08faec6234fd20c8361d8c080e9  cudaminer.exe
2a4a6c3440f3ec27ea7b2ec417808445  cudart32_60.dll
7812f0f73eda837e9353b3a433abc9a9  pthreadVC2.dll

any good settings you can share for a 750ti?

I do, and I'll share how I found them as well as it will need to be done again with each NFactor change.

The lookup gap is probably one of the most important settings when mining with algos that take a lot of memory. It is essentially a memory to CPU tradeoff. At higher lookup gaps you end up regenerating scratch spaces at the expense of more CPU time, but it ends up being more efficient overall. You can get a 15-33% increase in output by adding the lookup gap. I've found a lookup gap of 4 to work best at NF14 with most of my NVidia hardware. (480, 670, 750ti, 970). Every card is different and they also effect each other as a whole too, so configuring each card with its individual autotune settings may help increase the overall output.

Start off with autotune and try lookup gaps of 4. Add the debug (-D) flag so you can see the progress of the autotune.

Code:

-a scrypt-jane:14 -D -l auto -L 4

It will take awhile to grind through the different settings. Pay attention to the final configuration settings that comes up at the end of the autotune. Grab a copy of the console screen with the autotune settings for each GPU, order them by their card number (GPU #X) in your configuration screen or simply use the most common setting of the group for all of them. And don't be satisfied there. Try the next lookup gaps above and below too until you find that sweet spot. I went through lookup gaps of 1-8 trying to find the best settings.

Autotune Results

[2014-10-30 06:26:48] GPU #1: 3578.74 hash/s with configuration t35x4 <========== Copy each of these. Order by GPU number
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] GPU #1: using launch configuration t35x4
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 422.64 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] Temp: 51C Fan speed: 44% Power: N/A
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] 241:2.901| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] 233:2.787| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] 238:2.867| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] 245:2.919| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] GPU #3: 3575.32 hash/s with configuration t70x2
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] GPU #3: using launch configuration t70x2
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 213.05 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:48] Temp: 54C Fan speed: 46% Power: N/A
[2014-10-30 06:26:49] 242:2.901| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:49] 234:2.796| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:49] 239:2.864| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:49] 243:2.911| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:49] 235:2.803| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:50] 240:2.876| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:50] 244:2.918| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:50] 236:2.798| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:50] 241:2.878| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] 245:2.926| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] GPU #5: 3563.04 hash/s with configuration t70x2
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] GPU #5: using launch configuration t70x2
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 948.35 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] Temp: 46C Fan speed: 42% Power: N/A
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] 237:2.813| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] 242:2.901| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:51] 238:2.823| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:52] 243:2.895| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:52] 239:2.832| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:52] 244:2.902| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] 240:2.843| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] 245:2.912| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] GPU #2: 3542.71 hash/s with configuration t70x2
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] GPU #2: using launch configuration t70x2
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 938.02 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] Temp: 53C Fan speed: 45% Power: N/A
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] DEBUG: hash <= target
Hash: 00002c74546ed8e76f85aa75db09d4f0fbed962ecb5823c60443af054d4f573a
Target: 0000ffff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.46 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] Temp: 53C Fan speed: 44% Power: N/A
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 2526 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-10-30 06:26:53] 241:2.848| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:54] 242:2.864| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:55] 243:2.860| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:56] 244:2.870| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:56] 245:2.876| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kH/s
[2014-10-30 06:26:56] GPU #4: 3513.91 hash/s with configuration t70x2

Configuration

Here are the configs for both my 750ti rigs. I'm using Ubuntu Server 14.04 with Cuda 6.0 library- all stock as I haven't had too much stability with bios hacking higher cpu/mem speeds. From what I've seen Windows rigs underperform by a small margin as there is more overhead in the OS.

Code:

 -a scrypt-jane:14 -D -L 4 -l t35x4,t34x4,t70x2,t70x2,t70x2,t70x2 -o stratum+tcp://utc.tumblingblock.com:3333 

[2014-10-30 06:30:40] Stratum detected new block
[2014-10-30 06:30:40] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.40 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:40]         Temp:  56C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:40] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.33 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:40]         Temp:  58C  Fan speed:  49%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:40] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.35 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:40]         Temp:  58C  Fan speed:  48%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:40] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.28 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:40]         Temp:  59C  Fan speed:  49%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.46 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:40]         Temp:  56C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:40] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.34 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:40]         Temp:  50C  Fan speed:  43%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:55] DEBUG: hash <= target
Hash:   000001ad7b2379a4fd4d5e0f8b699ae52efb4c1251f3895c1aa500f62db5b2ef
Target: 0000247a2f949c7b000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
[2014-10-30 06:30:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.46 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:30:55]         Temp:  56C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:30:56] accepted: 30/30 (100.00%), 20.17 khash/s (yay!!!)

On another 6x 750ti rig I ended up using the autotune settings at a lookup-gap of 4 and defined the kernel settings for each card as it seemed to help out the last card which was lagging behind the others a bit.

Code:

 
   -a scrypt-jane:14 -D -L 4 -l t35x4,t35x4,t35x4,t35x4,t35x4,t70x2 -o stratum+tcp://utc.tumblingblock.com:3333

[2014-10-30 06:31:16] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.27 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:16]         Temp:  61C  Fan speed:  51%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:16] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.34 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:16]         Temp:  58C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.36 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:16]         Temp:  56C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.33 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:16]         Temp:  56C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:16] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2.89 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:16]         Temp:  56C  Fan speed:  47%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:16] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.53 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:16]         Temp:  57C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:20] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.42 khash/s
[2014-10-30 06:31:20]         Temp:  57C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-30 06:31:20] accepted: 25624/25734 (99.57%), 19.80 khash/s (yay!!!)

For some lulz I had my 670 at 3.8khash/s with some overclocking- also with a lookup gap of 4. It actually outperformed the 750ti at stock speeds, but with around 3x as much wattage. I couldn't quite get it to 4khash/s by upping the vcore voltage and cpu and memory speeds. My 970 on windows gets around 9khash/sec with a lookup gap of 4.

Grim

sr. member

Activity: 506

Merit: 252

Quote from: Kracko on October 29, 2014, 09:51:38 PM

Quote from: Namsbreh on October 29, 2014, 04:34:25 PM

Quote from: Kracko on October 28, 2014, 10:46:32 PM

I just got my 970. Gigabyte GV-N970WF30C0-4GD.

I was getting 8.8-9kh/s in Windows 7 with:

Code:

--algo=scrypt-jane:14 -L 4 -i 1 -l t64x4 -C 1

I haven't tried higher lookup gaps yet.

Which miner you using pls?

I've only managed to get 6.5kh/s so far.

https://github.com/cbuchner1/CudaMiner.git

If you can compile it yourself, I strongly urge doing it. There are several dependencies that you need, but it really isn't that bad. I added compute50/sm50 support as well for Maxwell cards. It is built with Visual Studio 2010 against the Cuda 6.0 library. If you'd rather have a pre-compiled binary here's what I'm using on my Windows machines:

http://utc.tumblingblock.com/cudaminer_cm10_50.zip

MD5Sums

Code:

6614a08faec6234fd20c8361d8c080e9  cudaminer.exe
2a4a6c3440f3ec27ea7b2ec417808445  cudart32_60.dll
7812f0f73eda837e9353b3a433abc9a9  pthreadVC2.dll

any good settings you can share for a 750ti?

Namsbreh

sr. member

Activity: 318

Merit: 250

Thanks, I must have been using an older version. Now getting 9.3kh/s.

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: Namsbreh on October 29, 2014, 04:34:25 PM

Quote from: Kracko on October 28, 2014, 10:46:32 PM

I just got my 970. Gigabyte GV-N970WF30C0-4GD.

I was getting 8.8-9kh/s in Windows 7 with:

Code:

--algo=scrypt-jane:14 -L 4 -i 1 -l t64x4 -C 1

I haven't tried higher lookup gaps yet.

Which miner you using pls?

I've only managed to get 6.5kh/s so far.

https://github.com/cbuchner1/CudaMiner.git

If you can compile it yourself, I strongly urge doing it. There are several dependencies that you need, but it really isn't that bad. I added compute50/sm50 support as well for Maxwell cards. It is built with Visual Studio 2010 against the Cuda 6.0 library. If you'd rather have a pre-compiled binary here's what I'm using on my Windows machines:

http://utc.tumblingblock.com/cudaminer_cm10_50.zip

MD5Sums

Code:

6614a08faec6234fd20c8361d8c080e9  cudaminer.exe
2a4a6c3440f3ec27ea7b2ec417808445  cudart32_60.dll
7812f0f73eda837e9353b3a433abc9a9  pthreadVC2.dll

fabietech

sr. member

Activity: 298

Merit: 250

Quote from: Official Ultracoin Team on October 29, 2014, 01:09:04 PM

Amazing news from the UTC management

Steven (Rapture333) has done a very big job for UTC and is tremendously dedicated to UTC for months.
Now we would like to promote Steven for his great job and dedication.

At this moment we want to give Stevan, from of today, full control in the UTC management as General Director.

Paul and Fabietech, offcource, are still here but Steven will be the new General Director of the UTC management team and he will be leading the team as from now.

With Steven as our new management leader we believe he will bring UTC to even higher levels. There are some WONDERFULL and AMAZING things happening behind the scenes what Steven will tell you about in detail as soon as possbile!

Regards,
UTC Management Team
Paulr, Fabietech and Steven.

He steven! also from me Cheers!!! welcome as Director of UTC

I think everybody here will congrats you!!

Levole11

hero member

Activity: 566

Merit: 500

Quote from: PaulR1 on October 29, 2014, 05:42:14 PM

Quote from: Official Ultracoin Team on October 29, 2014, 01:09:04 PM

Amazing news from the UTC management

Steven (Rapture333) has done a very big job for UTC and is tremendously dedicated to UTC for months.
Now we would like to promote Steven for his great job and dedication.

At this moment we want to give Stevan, from of today, full control in the UTC management as General Director.

Paul and Fabietech, offcource, are still here but Steven will be the new General Director of the UTC management team and he will be leading the team as from now.

With Steven as our new management leader we believe he will bring UTC to even higher levels. There are some WONDERFULL and AMAZING things happening behind the scenes what Steven will tell you about in detail as soon as possbile!

Regards,
UTC Management Team
Paulr, Fabietech and Steven.

Steven, cheers Mate....
You earned that position of General Director in the management team !

what does this mean for your position Paul?

PaulR1

sr. member

Activity: 320

Merit: 250

Quote from: Official Ultracoin Team on October 29, 2014, 01:09:04 PM

Amazing news from the UTC management

Steven (Rapture333) has done a very big job for UTC and is tremendously dedicated to UTC for months.
Now we would like to promote Steven for his great job and dedication.

At this moment we want to give Stevan, from of today, full control in the UTC management as General Director.

Paul and Fabietech, offcource, are still here but Steven will be the new General Director of the UTC management team and he will be leading the team as from now.

With Steven as our new management leader we believe he will bring UTC to even higher levels. There are some WONDERFULL and AMAZING things happening behind the scenes what Steven will tell you about in detail as soon as possbile!

Regards,
UTC Management Team
Paulr, Fabietech and Steven.

Steven, cheers Mate....
You earned that position of General Director in the management team !

PaulR1

sr. member

Activity: 320

Merit: 250

Quote from: pieterjanvh on October 29, 2014, 04:59:58 PM

Any word from the (probably lost) UTC at MintPal?

No PieterJan.... we have to accept we are scammed for 99% sure and lost our coins as many others ppl on mintpal...

Topic: [Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 211. (Read 381021 times)