Pages:
Author

Topic: [Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 67. (Read 381063 times)

legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
IMPORTANT NOTICE

if you are sending transactions to a rather large wallet - UXZCMmms...............

Please stop until we get past the fork block.

There are 1000's of inputs and the transactions are crashing the network while we have the diff problems with the old wallet.

Once we get past the fork - the new wallet rules will come into play - and the diff will stabilise - making shorter blocks and high input transactions easy again.

Many thanks for your co-operation.


Please PM me if you want to discuss.


Cheers - usukan

When is the fork block??


The fork is set for block number 1,824,237

Currently we are at 1812744
sr. member
Activity: 527
Merit: 251
Quality Crypto Collector
IMPORTANT NOTICE

if you are sending transactions to a rather large wallet - UXZCMmms...............

Please stop until we get past the fork block.

There are 1000's of inputs and the transactions are crashing the network while we have the diff problems with the old wallet.

Once we get past the fork - the new wallet rules will come into play - and the diff will stabilise - making shorter blocks and high input transactions easy again.

Many thanks for your co-operation.


Please PM me if you want to discuss.


Cheers - usukan

When is the fork block??
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
I Love CryptoDAO.com
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
it sounds good! only one thing to be clear, where is all the hashing power coming from? Is it legit or is there still a glitch in the wallet?
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
IMPORTANT NOTICE

if you are sending transactions to a rather large wallet - UXZCMmms...............

Please stop until we get past the fork block.

There are 1000's of inputs and the transactions are crashing the network while we have the diff problems with the old wallet.

Once we get past the fork - the new wallet rules will come into play - and the diff will stabilise - making shorter blocks and high input transactions easy again.

Many thanks for your co-operation.


Please PM me if you want to discuss.


Cheers - usukan
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
Bittrex: UTC wallet is under maintenance
Time for takeover i guess  Grin



either of these 2 things (or both) will likely be the cause for Bittrex to declare "wallet under maintenance"

1 - the network has an issue at present with miners connecting to pool - causing often very long block times at higher diff periods (Alenevaa will no doubt apply a fix when he gets a spare moment). Please be aware that this issue will likely re-occur until we get past the fork block.

2 - Bittrex has taken down the old wallet to install the new wallet. This used to take Cryptsy more than 2 weeks (sometimes months) - but is only likely to take Bittrex a few days,

Cheers - usukan
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Bittrex: UTC wallet is under maintenance
Time for takeover i guess  Grin
full member
Activity: 307
Merit: 100
Bittrex: UTC wallet is under maintenance
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
Where is all the hashing power coming from? Is it legit or is there still a glitch in the wallet?

The pools are showing a very small amount of hashing power on them (50Kh/s) while the network is showing 1.5Mh/s.  Is there an unlisted pool running somewhere or is there one individual with a good amount of hashing power basically running the show on their own right now?


Its just a glitch with the pool stats (that hash does not exist) - most hash on UTC is on the pool - sometime a few solo miners.

Alenevva may better explain.

Its been like this as long as I can remember.

Cheers - usukan

It's just a glitch with the wallet stats.

I raised this question some time ago:
2. Wrong Net Hashrate calulation by command getmininginfo

Code:
ultracoind getmininginfo
{
    "blocks" : 1692937,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.00099616,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 611210,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "Nfactor" : 14,
    "N" : 32768,
    "powreward" : 0.01000000
}

In this example net hashrate is more than 600 KHash/s. As actual hashrate is slightly more than 100 KHash/s.

Also you can note  "powreward" : 0.01000000
But it should be 10.


Fresh example:

Code:
ultracoind getmininginfo
{
    "blocks" : 1812461,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.02495300,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 257775,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "Nfactor" : 14,
    "N" : 32768,
    "powreward" : 0.01000000
}
Net hashrate is 257 KHash/s.
Actual hashrate is somewhere about 30 KHash/s.




Thanks Alenevaa - I am believing that once diff stabilises after the fork there is a good chance that this will auto correct.

Cheers - usukan

.
sr. member
Activity: 288
Merit: 260
Where is all the hashing power coming from? Is it legit or is there still a glitch in the wallet?

The pools are showing a very small amount of hashing power on them (50Kh/s) while the network is showing 1.5Mh/s.  Is there an unlisted pool running somewhere or is there one individual with a good amount of hashing power basically running the show on their own right now?


Its just a glitch with the pool stats (that hash does not exist) - most hash on UTC is on the pool - sometime a few solo miners.

Alenevva may better explain.

Its been like this as long as I can remember.

Cheers - usukan

It's just a glitch with the wallet stats.

I raised this question some time ago:
2. Wrong Net Hashrate calulation by command getmininginfo

Code:
ultracoind getmininginfo
{
    "blocks" : 1692937,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.00099616,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 611210,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "Nfactor" : 14,
    "N" : 32768,
    "powreward" : 0.01000000
}

In this example net hashrate is more than 600 KHash/s. As actual hashrate is slightly more than 100 KHash/s.

Also you can note  "powreward" : 0.01000000
But it should be 10.


Fresh example:

Code:
ultracoind getmininginfo
{
    "blocks" : 1812461,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.02495300,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 257775,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "Nfactor" : 14,
    "N" : 32768,
    "powreward" : 0.01000000
}
Net hashrate is 257 KHash/s.
Actual hashrate is somewhere about 30 KHash/s.

legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
Where is all the hashing power coming from? Is it legit or is there still a glitch in the wallet?

The pools are showing a very small amount of hashing power on them (50Kh/s) while the network is showing 1.5Mh/s.  Is there an unlisted pool running somewhere or is there one individual with a good amount of hashing power basically running the show on their own right now?


Its just a glitch with the pool stats (that hash does not exist) - most hash on UTC is on the pool - sometime a few solo miners.

Alenevva may better explain.

Its been like this as long as I can remember.

Cheers - usukan
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
Where is all the hashing power coming from? Is it legit or is there still a glitch in the wallet?

The pools are showing a very small amount of hashing power on them (50Kh/s) while the network is showing 1.5Mh/s.  Is there an unlisted pool running somewhere or is there one individual with a good amount of hashing power basically running the show on their own right now?
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
I'll take a guess.

Feb 14, 2017 @ 14:14:14 UTC


I donated 2500 to the pot as well.


Hi bret - thanks noted

AND a BIG thanks for your donation to the contest pot which has been received.


Cheers - usukan
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
I'll take a guess.

Feb 14, 2017 @ 14:14:14 UTC


I donated 2500 to the pot as well.
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
I'll take a guess.

Feb 14, 2017 @ 14:14:14 UTC


I donated 2500 to the pot as well.
legendary
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
The NEW Ultracoin contest entries - so far

please note that the prize pot has further swelled to 78,525 UTC thanks to the recent generosity of bret @2,500 UTC

So this is well over 1.5 BTC and well over USD 1,000


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16447179



primouno - October 10th,  2016, 19:56 UTC (although we have passed your date - you can still win if you have the "closest" date)

thispanda - November 18th, 2016, 02:32 UTC

usukan - November 30th, 2016, 24:00 UTC

srkili - December 5th, 2016, 12:00 UTC

Valpe - December 12th, 2016, 12:00 UTC

sambiohazard - December 15th, 2016 0001 UTC

Uggle - December 31st, 2016, 12:00 UTC

cointron - January 5th, 2017, 12:04 UTC

Laniakean - January 23rd, 2017, 12:00 UTC

CRYPTONAIRE - 31st January, 2017, 12:00 UTC

bret - Feb 14th, 2017, 14:14:14 UTC


Please feel free to add your entry - AND/OR add to the prize pot.


Cheers - usukan
sr. member
Activity: 527
Merit: 251
Quality Crypto Collector
Greetings!

My Ultracoin contest entry: 31st January 2017 12:00 UTC  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Thanks bathrobehero for the peer list Smiley

Contest entry seems tough, we need to break and sustain above 1000 sats to reach 2000 alongwith some positive news more than fixing the blockchain. Its a long term resistance we broke under.

My entry is December 15 2016 0001 UTC
Pages:
Jump to: