It would counter the very manipulative behaviour of giorgiomassa who wants to make everyone believe that it's only a few outsiders who have a problem with the CPP:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5617570
Why does he do that?
My position is, that there was and is nothing to misunderstood.
If they apply their TOS by the words, we can do the same. Not what we interpret into it is what counts, but what the words do say.
And they say: 10% for every 10 days of delayed delivery. No limits on that whatsoever.
Bitmine can now think "oh fuck, we didn't think we would be THAT late and we need to limit the CPP". They can try and see if people accept it, but in the end, when things go to court, they will lose with enforcing new rules on a sale made in the past.
Note:
I'm not to profit of this at all. I have ordered a 200MH/s unit and they can and probably will wait for the full 100 days to deliver the device to me, because it is not until then that they need to add a second CPP module to my order. Just expecting the worst.
@Finnminer:
And no, I'm not getting rich nor was I expecting to get, but I expected the miner to mine for its cost. Which is already impossible at this time, given my power costs, taxes and that they will probably put the CPP module on the bill, where I have to pay additional taxes. I'm already at a hefty loss and we're getting close to the day when the moment I power on the device I have yet to receive, it will mine on a loss. I'll initiate the refund very soon and I will do it based on the old conditions. If Bitmine thinks they don't need to accept my refund based on the old conditions, I'll go to court - simply because they really pissed me off multiple times by now and that is not the way you do business with me!