Pages:
Author

Topic: Unofficial BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread - page 38. (Read 202952 times)

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.
They've been running for over an hour now and still showing the same numbers...it's strange. The numbers on the display and the webinterface are correct.
I always had some differences between cgminer and the pool stats in the past using my GPU miners....but 377 Gh/s vs 1200 Gh/s.....I don't know...something seems to be wrong...

damn, not very encouraging.... you are the first guy I see reviewing an actual bitmine device... please go on testing the shit out of it... we need you.

Bitmine remains silent.

You guys are obviously new to mining.  It can take a long time for your recorded hashrate on a pool to level out.  Unless they offer hourly averages.  On P2Pool it can take up to seventy-two hours.
No XD As I said, we tried it at eligius which shows stats for multiple timeframes including 128 seconds. Btw, a round usually takes about 10 minutes and it was already running for more than an hour. I was also looking at the actual round times at blockchain.info. I'm not new to mining Wink And the problem is already solved...it was because of that strange webinterface XD

To sum it up:
We're now using ghash.io which is showing us 1.4 Th/s for 6 modules in normal mode Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.
They've been running for over an hour now and still showing the same numbers...it's strange. The numbers on the display and the webinterface are correct.
I always had some differences between cgminer and the pool stats in the past using my GPU miners....but 377 Gh/s vs 1200 Gh/s.....I don't know...something seems to be wrong...

damn, not very encouraging.... you are the first guy I see reviewing an actual bitmine device... please go on testing the shit out of it... we need you.

Bitmine remains silent.

You guys are obviously new to mining.  It can take a long time for your recorded hashrate on a pool to level out.  Unless they offer hourly averages.  On P2Pool it can take up to seventy-two hours.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
@georgem : Nope, nothing yet....and I can't tell much about the interface beacause I haven't seen it for myselfe and we'll keep the port 80 closed for security reasons Tongue


:-)

Setup VPN for yourself - it`s also nice to let some php monitoring script run on a webspace via Cgminer-API & port-forwarding. It´s simple & you can even too regulate what IP-adresses are allowed to read the API.
If looking for the script we use: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/simple-cgminer-remote-monitoring-script-now-with-email-alerts-222632

This should help you too monitor the devices without opening some ports of web-if to the internet.

We too let run each miner on some of this here: http://www.amazon.de/Websteckdose-Die-IP-Steckdose-WLAN-Temperatursensor/dp/B006O791N0

... & same special built ones with 400V input & 3x 3600W (240V) output for the rigs. Perfect if a miner makes trouble & you have to reboot from abroad - all together a nice way to manage everything without being there.
THX, I'm gonna look at this stuff later this week.
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
@georgem : Nope, nothing yet....and I can't tell much about the interface beacause I haven't seen it for myselfe and we'll keep the port 80 closed for security reasons Tongue


:-)

Setup VPN for yourself - it`s also nice to let some php monitoring script run on a webspace via Cgminer-API & port-forwarding. It´s simple & you can even too regulate what IP-adresses are allowed to read the API.
If looking for the script we use: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/simple-cgminer-remote-monitoring-script-now-with-email-alerts-222632

This should help you too monitor the devices without opening some ports of web-if to the internet.

We too let run each miner on some of this here: http://www.amazon.de/Websteckdose-Die-IP-Steckdose-WLAN-Temperatursensor/dp/B006O791N0

... & same special built ones with 400V input & 3x 3600W (240V) output for the rigs. Perfect if a miner makes trouble & you have to reboot from abroad - all together a nice way to manage everything without being there.




Thank you for the idea!
That would be nice to set up, I will try when miners arrive as I will set up those at warehouse - dont want heat & noise to home.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.
They've been running for over an hour now and still showing the same numbers...it's strange. The numbers on the display and the webinterface are correct.
I always had some differences between cgminer and the pool stats in the past using my GPU miners....but 377 Gh/s vs 1200 Gh/s.....I don't know...something seems to be wrong...

Strange... the display data is for sure the cgminer-API data what seems to be fine.

How long is the actual round running? Maybe you are just in a bad luck round what takes already hours & you just have this small part of shares up to now for 300GH average (I still think you have to wait for a fresh round).
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
It's working now Smiley

Problem:
If you're using multiple pools, it will split the power. Usually multiple pools are used for failover...
There's actually an option where you can set the pool balance, but if you select "Failover" it will set it back to "Pool Balance". Seems like the webinterface is in beta too...

Phew! Good to know.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
It's working now Smiley

Problem:
If you're using multiple pools, it will split the power. Usually multiple pools are used for failover...
There's actually an option where you can set the pool balance, but if you select "Failover" it will set it back to "Pool Balance". Seems like the webinterface is in beta too...
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
@georgem : Nope, nothing yet....and I can't tell much about the interface beacause I haven't seen it for myselfe and we'll keep the port 80 closed for security reasons Tongue


:-)

Setup VPN for yourself - it`s also nice to let some php monitoring script run on a webspace via Cgminer-API & port-forwarding. It´s simple & you can even too regulate what IP-adresses are allowed to read the API.
If looking for the script we use: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/simple-cgminer-remote-monitoring-script-now-with-email-alerts-222632

This should help you too monitor the devices without opening some ports of web-if to the internet.

We too let run each miner on some of this here: http://www.amazon.de/Websteckdose-Die-IP-Steckdose-WLAN-Temperatursensor/dp/B006O791N0

... & same special built ones with 400V input & 3x 3600W (240V) output for the rigs. Perfect if a miner makes trouble & you have to reboot from abroad - all together a nice way to manage everything without being there.


sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
i have the same problem. Ordered on 4th Oktober.
Was the december batch. ( 16. Dez ) shipping date.

In my account i see January batch. Hope the fix it and i get my 50% additional hashing Power

My Order Nr: 210x Queue Nr. 159 Payed on 4. Okt 2013 -> 1.000 Mhs

Uwe

Hmm... My order was also changed from "December batch" some time ago to "January Batch" asked from support about that, but no comment. order numer is 22XX from october
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.
They've been running for over an hour now and still showing the same numbers...it's strange. The numbers on the display and the webinterface are correct.
I always had some differences between cgminer and the pool stats in the past using my GPU miners....but 377 Gh/s vs 1200 Gh/s.....I don't know...something seems to be wrong...

damn, not very encouraging.... you are the first guy I see reviewing an actual bitmine device... please go on testing the shit out of it... we need you.

Bitmine remains silent.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.
They've been running for over an hour now and still showing the same numbers...it's strange. The numbers on the display and the webinterface are correct.
I always had some differences between cgminer and the pool stats in the past using my GPU miners....but 377 Gh/s vs 1200 Gh/s.....I don't know...something seems to be wrong...
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
@georgem : Nope, nothing yet....and I can't tell much about the interface beacause I haven't seen it for myselfe and we'll keep the port 80 closed for security reasons Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.

Exactly.

@Rave...have you recieved any information from bitmine regarding firmware updates?

How will this work?

Think they will post them like KNC via their blog... worked perfect at all.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
can i mine script ?
wich cryptocurrencies can i mine with that?
no scrypt - SHA256 only
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.

Exactly.

@Rave...have you recieved any information from bitmine regarding firmware updates?

How will this work?
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/

I think the stats of the pool take the average of some last rounds maybe - on slush it`s like that. Let it run for a few hours & look again.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
can i mine script ?
wich cryptocurrencies can i mine with that?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/
[/quote]
Turbo mode is available but it states that it's still in beta.

bitmine keeps screwing with uss..ffs
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
As I said, they're not runnig at my home. But I'll ask my friend for some screenshots...
But first he has some problems to solve...according to eligius.st the two miners deliver only 377 Gh/s. At ghash.io it was around 600 Gh/s....which is very strange. There are no HW errors and they should deliver at least 1200 Gh/s :/
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
Nice! Lucky you.  I'm in the "March week 2" batch... wow..  But someone tell me this, I am quite sure that no 50% cap was ever mentioned in the agreement when I bought.  Is changing contract terms after purchase a legal reason to void the contract (and hence get a refund)?

This is the Customer Protection Plan, so if you device is also delivered late, for example half april of may, you get also the bonus hashing capacity for free.

I'am also in the March "week 2" batch but I don't think the device will be ready in time, because of the delays of the December and Januari batches.
Pages:
Jump to: