Topic: Up Like Trump - page 169. (Read 572883 times)

Yeah.  

Of course there could be puppet masters behind those posed as puppet masters behind those acting sincere and all goody two shoes friendly faced, too.

The really smart politician of which there are very few himself is posed and he's back in the gravy train of puppet masters circling back to himself, but nobody knows it.  Reagan did that.

Just in case this wasn't a typo, I think it's "poised"

I am reminded of the classic....

"Hey man, what's that you smoking?"

"Oh, it some good shiiiit, yeah.  Here, try some."

"....."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCXqbjo6cb0

All that natural, recycled green excrement that saves a polar bear or two, making you eat organic food while replying on bitcointalk.org...

What's not to like?

Bullshit that attracts more bullshit can only be good shit. I think that goes without saying. Got to spread the shit, that makes flowers bloom they say. All in a pile it just stinks.

I do. But people keep posting and replying in them, telling me posting bullshit on threads isn't the same as "making them populars"

 

Lol, do you understand that posting bullshit on threads isn't the same as "making them populars"? xD

RECORD BREAKING: Exodus In Democrat Party, Quarter-Million Pennsylvania Voters Join GOP





The voter turnout in Pennsylvania is set to be record breaking as a reported 180,000 voters have joined the GOP.

As Trump mentioned during his final closing statement during the March 10th GOP debate, hosted by CNN, he stated that “millions of new voters” are joining his camp.  Trump pushed the idea that his ability to steal swing voters from the Democrat party will secure his win.  He also strongly suggested that the GOP and RNC “embrace” these new voters with open arms, indicating that Trump’s approach to being a unifying presidential leader was more than possible – it is happening as we speak.

When Ted Cruz, John Kasich, and Donald Trump square off in Pennsylvania’s April 26 Republican presidential primary, they will find themselves competing for votes from a rapidly changing base.


At least 128,000 voters statewide have changed their registration since Jan. 1 to join the party. Nearly 85,000 of them had been Democrats; 42,000 were independents or third-party voters. The GOP has also racked up 55,468 more first-time registrants.

The changes reflect what experts are calling an unprecedented number of party switches before a primary election.

That raises questions: Are Democrats and other voters flocking to the GOP in support of one of its three candidates? Or could they be plotting to stuff the ballot boxes for a Republican they think their nominee can beat in November?

“I don’t think we can say there’s one reason here,” said G. Terry Madonna, the veteran pollster who directs the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin and Marshall College. “But in the Philadelphia suburbs, if people are switching, some of that would be strategic: Vote for Trump because he would be the weakest candidate against [Hillary] Clinton.”

Since the start of 2016, nearly 215,000 Pennsylvania voters have switched their party affiliation, which includes the GOP surge, as well as 86,500 who became Democrats.

At the very least, the shift underscores something different about this year’s primary. The suspense of presidential races often ebbs before the Pennsylvania primary, but this year’s April 26 contest still has meaning – especially on the Republican side of the ballot.

The unexpected significance is what motivated Erik Blomain, formerly an unaffiliated voter, to register as a Republican.

“Normally our primary doesn’t matter a whole lot,” said Blomain, a 28-year-old medical student at Jefferson University, who says he plans to vote for Kasich. “It kind of matters more than any primary in my lifetime.”



http://government.northcrane.com/2016-election/donald-trump-exodus-pa-voter-exodus/

Not sure about bitcointalk people voting for clinton though. I could understand bernie, and of course TRUMP. But clinton?

I made clinton, TRUMP, bernie threads, all popular. Just search wilikon and the associate names

 

Yeah, I think I sense the same. There is something about her. I don´t say this because I dislike her and I certainly don´t want her to drop dead or anything. It´s just what it is.

There is a Clinton thread? There are actualy real people voting for Clinton?

There is a lot of variation in how people age, both mentally and physically.  I personally think Hillary shows symptoms of early dementia.  Compare her speech and conversation with the Hillary of 8 years ago.

I could certainly be wrong about that, but there's a lot of similarity with people I have known that had this problem.  There's nothing nice about it, this is not like a political smear.  Rather consider the "apparently crazy" email scandal.

Well, what if the explanation was "just plain crazy?"

Makes a lot more sense than trying to sort out devious evil.

Hmm... Again Idon't understand what's amazing here... Yeah he's just yelling on everyone and everything like a raging dog. And of course he needs no notes! He's not saying anything with the slightest amount of logic, why would he need notes? ^^

What you're saying is "it's amazing that someone always saying nonsense is still in the political course and even leading"?
The correct word for that is "terrifying", not "amazing"

I think it´s amazing how people this much up in the years can keep up all this campaigning. It must be gruelling and will be even more so. And Sanders is even older.

I don´t think she´s all that well. There´s something shaky about her. Of course that´s to be expected, she´s no spring chicken. Trump, although a year older, seems tip-top.

I am of this opinion.  It only means there are puppet masters already posed to take control of everything, of course. 

It is posted there. Taking responsibility for the staff. It´s a gem. Absolutely should be saved for use later on.

Maybe it´s true, she has something on the loose in the head.

Trump will totally take her apart in debates. He´s way too quick for her.

This should be posted on the clinton thread. I feel like I don't feed it as often. Poor lonely harpy cactus.

 

If someone is always ready to fight a new scandal, that's amazing. No teleprompters. No notes. It is amazing he is fighting TPTB with little investment, compared to them. Close to 20000 negative ads thus far. Mostly all from the GOPe to stop him.

1/100000th of that war chest would have stopped any other politicians a long time ago.

Don't forget: TRUMP is ALWAYS the one creating the scandal, ALWAYS controlling the narrative. The media jumps on it. He is playing chess with himself...

This whole election will be studied centuries from now. We are too close for this event to truly appreciate it. This is a game changer. $565 or so millions against you, from you own clan? come on!

You do not have to like him to find this amazing.

To be filed for future reference...

----------------------------

This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said

Twitchy  by Greg Pollowitz 3:19 pm

We’re not sure this is the best route for Hillary Clinton to take while trying to attack Donald Trump, especially with FBI agents reportedly getting set to interview her staff’s actions regarding her homebrew email server. But, alas, self-awareness never was her thing:

Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump is responsible for his staff's actions: https://t.co/troowMAacq

— Capital Journal (@WSJPolitics) March 30, 2016

She really doesn’t see where this is going, does she?

@WSJPolitics So that means Hillary is completely responsible for her illegal e-mail server?

— LetItBurnUSA (@LetItBurnUSA) March 30, 2016

Exactly. Let’s save this tweet just in case we need to remind her of what she said in the very near future:

Clip and save this for when she throws staff under the bus for her server https://t.co/jQr6s0LCxo

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) March 30, 2016

I wonder if Hillary really thought through this statement carefully… https://t.co/yXF9txNr8I

— Michael Q Sullivan (@MQSullivan) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics Good Then she will take responsibility for Mills, Sullivan, Abedin and her own crimes endangering nat'l sec #ClintonEmail

— Kim Seefeld (@KAS_SB) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics this is a saver. #tcot

— Bill Baar (@BillBaar) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics oh I can't wait till this comes back to haunt her!!

— Rebellious Mom (@jenladkins) March 30, 2016

And what about Bill’s behavior?

@WSJPolitics Any mention of responsibility for Bill's actions?

— Momo be tweet'n (@mcg0958) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics and who is responsible for her husband's actions or her email action or her Benghazi actions or her …..

— John Woods (@redeyebrody) March 30, 2016

Based on her record, this is the more likely response:

Politicians shouldn't blame staff for failings. They should blame a YouTube video, then try to walk it back later. https://t.co/jVvDPls4Ff

— Logan Dobson (@LoganDobson) March 30, 2016

You just now that’s coming.

***

The post This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said appeared first on twitchy.com.