Author

Topic: Up Like Trump - page 166. (Read 572795 times)

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 01, 2016, 02:33:09 PM
Well yeah, the system´s greatest concern is the system I guess. So, NATO is saving the free world from commies and russkies and yes, terrorists. The Border patrol is saving Americans from wetbacks. All this costs money. Without a threat and enemies, real or not, that money is probably more difficult to get. When it´s up to a trillion bucks a year the stakes are gigantic of course.

Wetbacks are just the syndrome. The Americans should treat the root cause first rather than going for short term solutions. They should remove the birth-right citizenship option, which is triggering this massive illegal alien influx. All the anchor babies should be stripped of their citizenship and deported back to the mafia infested shithole of Mexico. 

Some years ago, the Rio Grande was diverted and a lake on the Mexican side created (A deal in which the US got Screwed, the Mexicans did not live up to their side of the bargain).  One result of this is that the Rio Grande is not a grand river, but an empty creekbed, or perhaps has a trickle of water.

In any case, there are really no "wetbacks" anymore.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 02:29:01 PM
The major reason why I might like to see Trump win would be, all those other candidates deserve to lose the money they spend on their campaigns... but not Trump. I would hate to see Trump lose all that precious money of his that he spent on his campaign.

Smiley

He has really spent peanuts...

According to The Sunlight Foundation, after the period ending Feb. 20, Trump will have spent $17.5 million of his own funds on his campaign—68 percent of the total amount he’s raised since June. $7.7 million has come from donations to his website, which features a prominent “DONATE” button in its upper right-hand corner.

Trump owns a commercial-sized plane, a Boeing 757-200, which is equipped to safely transport 43 passengers in seat belts plated with 24-carat gold—although they might prefer to sit in the dining room, one of two bedrooms, or in the shower, (or they might prefer to travel in his smaller jet or one of his two helicopters).
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 01, 2016, 02:12:43 PM
The major reason why I might like to see Trump win would be, all those other candidates deserve to lose the money they spend on their campaigns... but not Trump. I would hate to see Trump lose all that precious money of his that he spent on his campaign.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
April 01, 2016, 02:12:09 PM
The birth right was never meant for mexicans but for the children of slaves, so they could be free at birth, instead of be owned like their parents in perpetuity. This is what lawyers and coyotes are using to make money.

It makes no sense at all. On January 31, 1865, Slavery was officially abolished in the United States. The birth right citizenship option should have been de-activated right then. It surprises me that no one has attempted to overturn this option even after so many millions of illegal aliens exploited it to acquire citizenship illegally.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 01, 2016, 02:08:16 PM
Well yeah, the system´s greatest concern is the system I guess. So, NATO is saving the free world from commies and russkies and yes, terrorists. The Border patrol is saving Americans from wetbacks. All this costs money. Without a threat and enemies, real or not, that money is probably more difficult to get. When it´s up to a trillion bucks a year the stakes are gigantic of course.

Wetbacks are just the syndrome. The Americans should treat the root cause first rather than going for short term solutions. They should remove the birth-right citizenship option, which is triggering this massive illegal alien influx. All the anchor babies should be stripped of their citizenship and deported back to the mafia infested shithole of Mexico. 


The birth right was never meant for mexicans but for the children of slaves, so they could be free at birth, instead of be owned like their parents in perpetuity. This is what lawyers and coyotes are using to make money.

They have a terrible (actually no) respect for life and freedom in South America. Totalitarians from the left to right, no rights for self defense, etc. They are importing this destruction in the USA. The American, legal, multiple generation latinos are the first to be fearful of that new wave and they do not want this. At all.


legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
April 01, 2016, 01:56:20 PM
Well yeah, the system´s greatest concern is the system I guess. So, NATO is saving the free world from commies and russkies and yes, terrorists. The Border patrol is saving Americans from wetbacks. All this costs money. Without a threat and enemies, real or not, that money is probably more difficult to get. When it´s up to a trillion bucks a year the stakes are gigantic of course.

Wetbacks are just the syndrome. The Americans should treat the root cause first rather than going for short term solutions. They should remove the birth-right citizenship option, which is triggering this massive illegal alien influx. All the anchor babies should be stripped of their citizenship and deported back to the mafia infested shithole of Mexico. 
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 01:06:37 PM
I say NATO because the United States is the cornerstone of that. At first it was supposed to counter the Soviet threat (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) but it has expanded to what looks like world police. Working with the usual world cop, Uncle Sam. Maybe it was supposed to be good cop bad cop but that hasn´t really worked and it has turned uot all pretty bad cop.

Looks like nato exists because of the technological sophistication of third world powers: https://chomsky.info/20090403/

Quote
if you go back to 1989 and 1990, it’s extremely interesting to see how the United States reacted to the collapse of the Soviet Union. So, right after the fall of the Berlin Wall twenty years ago, which signaled the end of the Soviet Union, clearly, the Bush administration, Bush I, immediately released a national security strategy, a military budget, and so on, which are very interesting reading. What they say, in effect, is everything is going to go on exactly as before, but with new pretexts. So now we have to have a huge military establishment and military budget, and not to protect ourselves from the Russians, who are collapsing, but because — literally, because of the technological sophistication of third world powers. Now, that was promulgated without ridicule. You know, if someone was watching from Mars, they’d collapse in laughter.

Nato was always a way for america to project its power. Without competition it can use its power on a wider scale.

Yes, and the Russians are again supposed to be about to gobble up the free world. It´s really strange; NATO has no armies to speak of in Europe to counter that invasion which has been imminent forever. The Russians would be at the English Channel before you know it. But of course they´re not interested in that. They have no reason for it. So, they´ll be a threat and a very profitable one in the coming decades as before.
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
April 01, 2016, 12:58:34 PM
I say NATO because the United States is the cornerstone of that. At first it was supposed to counter the Soviet threat (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) but it has expanded to what looks like world police. Working with the usual world cop, Uncle Sam. Maybe it was supposed to be good cop bad cop but that hasn´t really worked and it has turned uot all pretty bad cop.

Looks like nato exists because of the technological sophistication of third world powers: https://chomsky.info/20090403/

Quote
if you go back to 1989 and 1990, it’s extremely interesting to see how the United States reacted to the collapse of the Soviet Union. So, right after the fall of the Berlin Wall twenty years ago, which signaled the end of the Soviet Union, clearly, the Bush administration, Bush I, immediately released a national security strategy, a military budget, and so on, which are very interesting reading. What they say, in effect, is everything is going to go on exactly as before, but with new pretexts. So now we have to have a huge military establishment and military budget, and not to protect ourselves from the Russians, who are collapsing, but because — literally, because of the technological sophistication of third world powers. Now, that was promulgated without ridicule. You know, if someone was watching from Mars, they’d collapse in laughter.

Nato was always a way for america to project its power. Without competition it can use its power on a wider scale.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 12:46:25 PM
I say NATO because the United States is the cornerstone of that. At first it was supposed to counter the Soviet threat (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) but it has expanded to what looks like world police. Working with the usual world cop, Uncle Sam. Maybe it was supposed to be good cop bad cop but that hasn´t really worked and it has turned uot all pretty bad cop.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 12:41:58 PM
Well yeah, the system´s greatest concern is the system I guess. So, NATO is saving the free world from commies and russkies and yes, terrorists. The Border patrol is saving Americans from wetbacks. All this costs money. Without a threat and enemies, real or not, that money is probably more difficult to get. When it´s up to a trillion bucks a year the stakes are gigantic of course.
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
April 01, 2016, 12:32:29 PM
The National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) said that our open border is the biggest physical & economic threat facing the American people!

Doubt it. Trillions spent in endless wars? Extreme inequality? Corporations avoiding almost all taxes? No. Your mexican maid is the biggest threat. Not surprising considering source.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 12:31:29 PM
Wow, I can´t believe that Kris Kristofferson turns 80 in June.

Supply and Demand...

You Copped Out/The American Way - scene from Flashpoint (1984) - Kurtwood Smith & Kris Kristofferson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf_KhBVjexY
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 12:25:55 PM
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

2 hours ago
For the 1st time in American history, America’s 16,500 border patrol agents have issue a presidential primary endorsement—me! Thank you.

2 hours ago
The National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) said that our open border is the biggest physical & economic threat facing the American people!
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 12:15:05 PM
They´re way too late to stop him now I think...

Apr 5
Wisconsin · 42 delegates

Apr 19
New York · 95 delegates

Apr 26
Connecticut · 28 delegates
Delaware · 16 delegates
Maryland · 38 delegates
Pennsylvania · 17 delegates
Rhode Island · 19 delegates
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
April 01, 2016, 12:07:39 PM
Donald Trump's abortion remarks provoke biggest crisis of his campaign
The Guardian‎ - 3 hours ago
Donald Trump was facing the biggest crisis of his bid for the White House on Thursday, after ...

Donald Trump Clears the Air With Republican Leaders
New York Times‎ - 10 hours ago

Donald Trump is now the least popular American politician in three decades
Los Angeles Times‎ - 2 hours ago

I'm not terribly concerned.  The negative perception, if it is even true and not another fairly common form of propaganda leveraging group-think dynamics, was achieved by the establishment media pulling out ALL the stops and sinking to extreme depths of dishonesty.  Even some of my highly progressive family cannot ignore it any more.  7 months is plenty of time to engineer a backlash, if it even needs any engineering at all.

I would suggest to Trump that he develop a brief catchy civics lesson to counter the abortion thing.  Along the lines of:

"The 'abortion' comment related to ILLEGAL abortion just as the immigration thing relates to ILLEGAL immigration.  The mainstream media almost always and very dishonestly leaves out the 'illegal' part for propaganda reasons.  Under our form of government, congress makes laws, courts decide if the laws are allowed, and the executive enforces those which are found to be legal.  As president I intend to enforce laws whether I agree with them or not.  The American people are sick of other people and groups being 'above the law' and I intend to put a stop to it on many fronts."

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
April 01, 2016, 11:45:05 AM
Donald Trump's abortion remarks provoke biggest crisis of his campaign
The Guardian‎ - 3 hours ago
Donald Trump was facing the biggest crisis of his bid for the White House on Thursday, after ...

Donald Trump Clears the Air With Republican Leaders
New York Times‎ - 10 hours ago

Donald Trump is now the least popular American politician in three decades
Los Angeles Times‎ - 2 hours ago
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 01, 2016, 11:12:08 AM



If Trump becomes president: Donald will make the world great again, until aliens blow it up












 Cheesy Grin Cheesy


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
March 31, 2016, 08:16:07 PM







Cause claiming women using abortion should be punished by law is clearly not something you should be offended by.


No more than the upcoming millions of abortions, coming in europe after the tsunami of rapes...




Whaou whaou whaou... Now that's something the defies imagination, to be able to spout out such nonsense without even thinking about it.

You do realize that what you suggest would mean that at least 50% of all immigrants are serial rapists?


Not at all. I suggest a few 1000 men in a mission can impregnate thousands of women. Each man can rape many women. This is one of the many tools of war. It was used in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

Maybe you believed I meant one man raping one woman?

Nah.

 Smiley




Nothing to add. This guy is clearly saying he believes we're going to be invaded by a few hundreds men whose only goal will be to rape and impregnate European women.

I think it's enough for everyone to understand how crazy you are.


Just get your passport ready. You'll be the first to leave france behind, with a white flag between you teeth...

legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
March 31, 2016, 08:13:33 PM







Cause claiming women using abortion should be punished by law is clearly not something you should be offended by.


No more than the upcoming millions of abortions, coming in europe after the tsunami of rapes...




Whaou whaou whaou... Now that's something the defies imagination, to be able to spout out such nonsense without even thinking about it.

You do realize that what you suggest would mean that at least 50% of all immigrants are serial rapists?


Not at all. I suggest a few 1000 men in a mission can impregnate thousands of women. Each man can rape many women. This is one of the many tools of war. It was used in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

Maybe you believed I meant one man raping one woman?

Nah.

 Smiley




Nothing to add. This guy is clearly saying he believes we're going to be invaded by a few hundreds men whose only goal will be to rape and impregnate European women.

I think it's enough for everyone to understand how crazy you are.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
March 31, 2016, 08:07:48 PM







Cause claiming women using abortion should be punished by law is clearly not something you should be offended by.


No more than the upcoming millions of abortions, coming in europe after the tsunami of rapes...




Whaou whaou whaou... Now that's something the defies imagination, to be able to spout out such nonsense without even thinking about it.

You do realize that what you suggest would mean that at least 50% of all immigrants are serial rapists?


Not at all. I suggest a few 1000 men in a mission can impregnate thousands of women. Each man can rape many women. This is one of the many tools of war. It was used in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

Maybe you believed I meant one man raping one woman?

Nah.

 Smiley


Jump to: