NEW THREAD:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xspec-spectrecoin-untraceable-tx-ring-signatures-tor-integration-1704473
Topic: [UPDATED][ANN] - new thread open (Read 15376 times)
pliss chek my pm sir
I did and I answered you...
pliss chek my pm sir
Is there a blog/article bounty for Spectrecoin?
I'm interested whether you guys will accept someone articles created to market the coin on steemit and facebook bitcoin related groups. You'd get more users to learn more about you if marketed well.
I'm interested whether you guys will accept someone articles created to market the coin on steemit and facebook bitcoin related groups. You'd get more users to learn more about you if marketed well.
Anyone has nodes for the wallet? Mine cannot find any :/
DO we have twiiter campaign for this coin.. i want to share this promising coin to my cryptobuddies on twitter. Already followed you for some update and news.
I think no need of any Twitter campaign but we need Facebook advertisement .At twitter only less numbers of words are available to tell about Bitcoin and this best service So i think we need Facebook instead of twitter .
DO we have twiiter campaign for this coin.. i want to share this promising coin to my cryptobuddies on twitter. Already followed you for some update and news.
SPEC ICO will be used escrow or direct addresses Dev?
Did you consider?
Spectrecoin Private and Anonymous Distribution
The only way to acquire SPEC is by taking part in the ICO and by offering a stealth address to receive the coins. With a Tor / I2P integration and a ‘no personal information’ policy, the whole of the distribution will occur anonymous and traceless and all transactions are protected from the outset. Total privacy from block 1, no compromise. You can also take part in the ICO by using the built-in ShapeShift function to pay with Monero or Shadowcash for increased privacy. This means that you can acquire SPEC in total privacy and anonymously. This supports the philosophy behind the project. I would suggest that upon distribution, SPEC is the most private blockchain in the cryptocurrency space for these reasons. We do not keep any personal information and we do not ask and you do not need to register with anything else but a SPEC stealth address and a Bitcoin address.
Spectrecoin Private and Anonymous Distribution
The only way to acquire SPEC is by taking part in the ICO and by offering a stealth address to receive the coins. With a Tor / I2P integration and a ‘no personal information’ policy, the whole of the distribution will occur anonymous and traceless and all transactions are protected from the outset. Total privacy from block 1, no compromise. You can also take part in the ICO by using the built-in ShapeShift function to pay with Monero or Shadowcash for increased privacy. This means that you can acquire SPEC in total privacy and anonymously. This supports the philosophy behind the project. I would suggest that upon distribution, SPEC is the most private blockchain in the cryptocurrency space for these reasons. We do not keep any personal information and we do not ask and you do not need to register with anything else but a SPEC stealth address and a Bitcoin address.
I know alot of development have been done on Tor technology, but recently FBI was able to bridge this tech and trace some users
Did you consider?
Spectrecoin Private and Anonymous Distribution
The only way to acquire SPEC is by taking part in the ICO and by offering a stealth address to receive the coins. With a Tor / I2P integration and a ‘no personal information’ policy, the whole of the distribution will occur anonymous and traceless and all transactions are protected from the outset. Total privacy from block 1, no compromise. You can also take part in the ICO by using the built-in ShapeShift function to pay with Monero or Shadowcash for increased privacy. This means that you can acquire SPEC in total privacy and anonymously. This supports the philosophy behind the project. I would suggest that upon distribution, SPEC is the most private blockchain in the cryptocurrency space for these reasons. We do not keep any personal information and we do not ask and you do not need to register with anything else but a SPEC stealth address and a Bitcoin address.
Spectrecoin Private and Anonymous Distribution
The only way to acquire SPEC is by taking part in the ICO and by offering a stealth address to receive the coins. With a Tor / I2P integration and a ‘no personal information’ policy, the whole of the distribution will occur anonymous and traceless and all transactions are protected from the outset. Total privacy from block 1, no compromise. You can also take part in the ICO by using the built-in ShapeShift function to pay with Monero or Shadowcash for increased privacy. This means that you can acquire SPEC in total privacy and anonymously. This supports the philosophy behind the project. I would suggest that upon distribution, SPEC is the most private blockchain in the cryptocurrency space for these reasons. We do not keep any personal information and we do not ask and you do not need to register with anything else but a SPEC stealth address and a Bitcoin address.
I will try, mind you some minor details are still being worked on. I will cite initial scenario we used as a base for discussion (Bob and Alice of course)
Thanks a lot, that clear things up quite a bit!
There is one point I am not so sure about - you assume both Bob and Alice have Android phones... Given the pace the technology is evolving, this could be a reasonable assumption, but from other hand, if we consider this transfer system being a replacement of Hawala-type systems, one should account for the case where the parties just do not have an advanced phone; especially this refers to the one who receives the funds, but could be true for both.
For un-banked people this could be a problem, both because of financial issues (smartphones are still expensive to some), and personal views (some people just hate technology and would refrain from using smartphone). Those people are however the target userbase of the project (besides the brokers), right?
Is there a scenario considered allowing the funds sender and (especially) recipient, to avoid using smartphones?
There is a limit to what old tech can do I guess and it is aimed at an emerging market and is a first application. There is a great potential for other uses and possibly other applications as well. It can also be used as a payment app you know. The tech is essentially just a "trustless" chain of transfers.
Sure, I understand old tech is limited and you cannot write an app for old "dumb" cellphone
But what about giving a possibility at least for the recipient of funds to avoid using a smartphone, but just use a code-word instead (entered at smartphone of dealer 2)...?
In any case, good luck to your project. I surely do not want to push you do something. Just want to see if this could be really used to bring a tech advancements to the people who do not have/understand/like technology. They could be a very good target market. Generally speaking, I believe the further the clients are from tech world, the bigger the benefits of tech can be for them, and so bigger margins could be expected for someone entering the field.
Not too big to campaigns and things that limit people to campaign for at least a signature look was very tight
all competing on other ICO
all competing on other ICO
I will try, mind you some minor details are still being worked on. I will cite initial scenario we used as a base for discussion (Bob and Alice of course)
Thanks a lot, that clear things up quite a bit!
There is one point I am not so sure about - you assume both Bob and Alice have Android phones... Given the pace the technology is evolving, this could be a reasonable assumption, but from other hand, if we consider this transfer system being a replacement of Hawala-type systems, one should account for the case where the parties just do not have an advanced phone; especially this refers to the one who receives the funds, but could be true for both.
For un-banked people this could be a problem, both because of financial issues (smartphones are still expensive to some), and personal views (some people just hate technology and would refrain from using smartphone). Those people are however the target userbase of the project (besides the brokers), right?
Is there a scenario considered allowing the funds sender and (especially) recipient, to avoid using smartphones?
There is a limit to what old tech can do I guess and it is aimed at an emerging market and is a first application. There is a great potential for other uses and possibly other applications as well. It can also be used as a payment app you know. The tech is essentially just a "trustless" chain of transfers.
I think the privacy is nice.
Graphically, it needs to be more beautiful.
It looks very simple, the investor looks at the details.
Graphically, it needs to be more beautiful.
It looks very simple, the investor looks at the details.
I am planning maybe some more detail. I would that investors would look at the potential this has to transform cryptocurrency and be really subversive.
Good Day!
I have not downloaded the app yet but will certainly do as soon as time allows me to do so. Are there rewards feature on this app? For example, earn specific number of reward points for referring someone. The wallet that I am using now have this feature.
I will try, mind you some minor details are still being worked on. I will cite initial scenario we used as a base for discussion (Bob and Alice of course)
Thanks a lot, that clear things up quite a bit!
There is one point I am not so sure about - you assume both Bob and Alice have Android phones... Given the pace the technology is evolving, this could be a reasonable assumption, but from other hand, if we consider this transfer system being a replacement of Hawala-type systems, one should account for the case where the parties just do not have an advanced phone; especially this refers to the one who receives the funds, but could be true for both.
For un-banked people this could be a problem, both because of financial issues (smartphones are still expensive to some), and personal views (some people just hate technology and would refrain from using smartphone). Those people are however the target userbase of the project (besides the brokers), right?
Is there a scenario considered allowing the funds sender and (especially) recipient, to avoid using smartphones?
I think the privacy is nice.
Graphically, it needs to be more beautiful.
It looks very simple, the investor looks at the details.
Graphically, it needs to be more beautiful.
It looks very simple, the investor looks at the details.
I am planning maybe some more detail. I would that investors would look at the potential this has to transform cryptocurrency and be really subversive.
I think the privacy is nice.
Graphically, it needs to be more beautiful.
It looks very simple, the investor looks at the details.
Graphically, it needs to be more beautiful.
It looks very simple, the investor looks at the details.
Thanks for the ad, I will include it on the main page.
Add to iconews.org.
http://www.iconews.org/spectrecoin-start-ico/
http://www.iconews.org/spectrecoin-start-ico/
I think the bonus range is fair and is attractive enough to investors when compared to some ICO where there is 50% first day bonus and after that the funding is more less stop because potential investors who miss the first day bonus will look at the distribution of the bonus has unfair
I think 1 week of high bonus is fair enough and it gives us a few days to get some more info out and for people to decide what to do.
Sometimes investors and traders observe first how the Ico perform before they invest,and the distribution bonus is not only fair,but they will not think that they have missed the train
Jump to: