Topic: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial - page 6. (Read 3835 times)

for years, i have avoided the F-bomb slang, but as you are a moderator, and are fine with it. so must i
a few people i have wanted to tell directly to f**k off (where **='uc/or') but now feel comfy telling them what i exactly mean, cheers

when the case wins in favour of COPA (no if).. id hope contempt is least of CSW troubles. id hope the copa win would then be used as evidence of forgery, fraud and multiple other crimes and someone files criminal claims against him. rather then these silly civil claims of annoyances


told ya he would.
the thing about courts is, if you (or your lawyer) are filing a claim they have to check what they file, and sign it in.. much like checking your bag before going to airport, because if the court/airport find things when they search what you hand in, you are on the hook. you cant then later cry 'but someone i dont trust done it for me', sorry but you are still on the hook for what has been handed over in your name


this here is where my theory of him not caring about win or lose* as it adds depth to his life story which will be hero/villain(obvious villain) story..
(*where he treats even a court loss as a win for his villain life story agenda)

..for years he has hired people to record his life and is doing these admissions of fraud, recorded... because in his eyes even if he fails satoshi test he hopes he can win billions via movie deals selling a thriller/sci fi/documentary of villain stature

afterall why would you record yourself performing forgery unless you want to package it up as part of a portfolio of 'art' to be part of some media deal later on.

i know he is not smart enough to realise these civil cases can turn criminal. but thinks whilst only civil he is free to do as he pleases without personal repurcussions because its not his money that covers his legal games.. but i do hope someone uses these civil cases as evidence to get some criminal charges filed

..
the funny thing is. all of these attempts by him to try to [fake/pretend/fail] 'proof of an identity' are so weak/lame.. that he could not even(if he tried) try to convince the world that he wrote TV shows like 'six feet under' and 'lost', which was wrote by another guy actually called steven wright..

so him still, years later playing the part of faketoshi is not about proving satoshi status. but just some other fame deal he actually wants, and promised his investors of riches from.. which is.. movie/book deal royalties, convention/tour/interview/speaking deals, oh and lollipops(couple of £) court wins.

my 'faketoshi vision' of CSW is that i hope to see that at the end of this case. CSW stands up from the court walks out the door hoping to see camera's but instead sees the UK CPS (crown prosecution service) and a couple cops put him under arrest, and due to being a known flight risk(ATO drama) dont let him out of jail until a criminal judge is sitting infront of him
(yea i can occasionally have a utopian day dream too, but lets hope it happens)

Day 15:

Missed about an hour or so of the trial today but the bits I did catch were Craig getting fucked. COPA were calling him a liar continually and suggesting he was in contempt several times. Craig was doing more of his usual Shaggy Defence and blaming anyone else he could. He admitted that several of the documents were forgeries, but again, not by him and other malicious actors. COPA asked then why he was using them in his evidence. More excuses obviously. Gets caught out. Passes the blame.

Craig was shown a video of him literally trying to forge the whitepaper in latex changing it bit by bit to try match the true and original whitepaper. Craig claimed he was just doing a "demonstration" to some unnamed party. You can view the compiled animation from his log edits here: https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1761038309554332034

It was also noted today from the disclosed emails Satoshi was obviously very familiar with "unsigned int" which Craig was obviously not: https://twitter.com/dotkrueger/status/1761040309197353395

I'm not sure if Craig is back for more questioning next week or it's the developers for COPA. If Craig isn't prosecuted for contempt after this then there's no justice.


Well sure, but I think it's a little bit different as Satoshi owns over 1 million btc valued at around $50 billion give or take. Satoshi coming back would cause quite a stir as people would no doubt wonder if his "vision" may steer bitcoin in a different direction.


The whole trial is a nonsensical farce. Satoshi obviously released it to the world for free and under such a license and if he wanted to prove he was back he would do it in the way Satoshi designed bitcoin to be. Obviously when you're not Satoshi you have to try prove it the way Craig is trying and failing to do.

Really hoping they challenge Faketoshi on this part:


Clearly not intended to be patented in any way, shape or form.

temporary price drama is just blackfriday discount month.. not really a bitcoin killer event
take a look at this last month jan 11th+
grayscale sold 174k of its 620k coins  now check the market price jan 10th vs feb 23rd
($46k $39.5k  $51k)
yes it went down but then it came back up within a month

Day 14

Another short day yesterday as Craig's council dismisses witnesses en masse, but those left still made Craig look very incompetent.

Howard Hinnant, who created the c++ library Craig claimed to have used, was one of the witnesses. Craig Wright claims he modified some code to which Hinnant - someone who obviously knows what he's talking about - commented: "That would be absurd, like starting with a P-51 Mustang plane & ending up with Ford Mustang car. Technically so outrageous that it's literally unbelievable." 

Justice Mellor surprised many in the court by pointing out an error one of the witnesses made, which shows he's following along closely. I'm not sure how easy it would be for someone not involved in bitcoin to follow everything going on and I suspect Craig's plan is to try blindside people with irrelevant technobabble. I think these witnesses yesterday showed what an absolute charlatan Craig is. He's just a confident talker but can't back it up when it comes down to it, especially regarding anything technical.

Craig is now back on the stand today and this should be Craig's most taxing day given they're now going over all the evidence presented throughout the week that Craig will need to refute.


I don't think that would be good for bitcoin overall. People would panic thinking Satoshi is going to cause disruption and possibly worry he will dump his coins. I think if Satoshi was going to come back he would have done so already, and assuming he isn't dead, Craig's bullshit wouldn't be a worthy excuse for him to return. 99.9% of people already know Craig is a fraud and we don't need proof from Satoshi for that.


Adam Back also shared his: https://twitter.com/pete_rizzo_/status/1760718737286537526

Thanks for sharing. I only skimmed it since it's very long, but it looks like they mostly talked about technical and promotional (e.g. creating website along with it's content) stuff. And since the trial shows CSW lack of technical knowledge, while these email shows Satoshi have fair amount of technical knowledge.

Following his testimony at the COPA trial, Sirius released the bulk of his 2009-2011 email correspondence with Satoshi:
https://mmalmi.github.io/satoshi/


https://x.com/marttimalmi/status/1760886692469162491?s=20

You absolutely right, Satoshi I mean the real Satoshi, i he decide to come and challenge craig, then what is the point  ?  This case has nothing to do with the real man the i9nventor of Bitcoin Blockchain and the author of Bitcoin While Paper.  He is a busy man.  Of course he knows  that Craig has infringed his Bitcoin White Paper but he is talking a bit time to challenge him on the ground of his intellectual property of Bitcoin White Paper. Not only that, Craig has stolen the BSV from Satoshi Nakamoto.   BSV mean Bitcoin Security Version. Satoshi Nakamoto is the designer of the Bitcoin Logo and first he published it in Twitter.  so, he wont allow Craig to use its the property of the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

The Bitcoin account handle of your ''Kakmakr'' is also belong to Satoshi Nakamoto. He has given it to you for you you to use it. Now you know what I am speaking about ?   Just relax and make money out his Bitcoin invention and leave Satoshi Nakamoto alone.

If the real Satoshi sign a message will you be happy ? 

Then you will post, no it is not true, may be some one has stollen his Private Key,  blaa blaaa blaaaaaa. 
Every body want to know who is Satoshi but no one is asking How is Satoshi ?

you all are bunch greedy Gremlins. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NpixdbriHA

And yet, BSV groupies will keep sucking CSW's cock, no matter what...

The perfect ending for this trail will be if the real Satoshi Nakamoto could sign a message, saying.. "Craig wright is an imposter, I am the real Satoshi Nakamoto" ...but we know that will not happen. 🙄

This must obviously be done with the early bitcoins that was mined by him and not from some "fake" early coins that were ramdomly chosen. 

Well, that seems to be the problem -- conflating "Bitcointalk" with the "Bitcoin Forum." Camp Craig is using this difference in terminology to gaslight people into thinking satoshi's posts here aren't his own (its quite easy to prove none of them were altered or deleted using the Wayback Machine).

Meanwhile, its worth pointing out that the forum has always been named the Bitcoin Forum. Its easy enough to verify for yourself by comparing the words in the forum name field (where it says 'Bitcoin Forum' in the top left of any forum page) as shown in 2009 to what they are today:

https://web.archive.org/web/20091215005450/http://bitcointalk.org/

Our own CryptoDevil tweeted a transcript of what Martti Malmi (Sirius) had to say in his video deposition, kind of interesting stuff:

https://twitter.com/CryptoDevil/status/1760263016291995926

Seemed like a rough day for bitcointalk in this trial. They seemed to go after Blockstream pretty hard and made it public knowledge that satoshi’s account here was removed from him as well as his commit access. Sure, there’s reasons these things happened, but it sounded bad the way it was presented.

its more about this:
https://craigwright.net/about/academic-degrees/
he says he has dozens of degree's.. but to be able to write so many papers at some points, in such quick succession to hand in within day/weeks of each other.. indicate someone else was paid to write them

usually degrees take years to do one

(i have not contacted the universities to even check validity of the list..)

if those do validate, (but obviously contain alot of plagiarisms) it just wreaks of the smell of someone that just goes on fiverr and pays minimum amounts for a quick paper, for someone to write(copy and paste from un-cited sources) something about [insert topic] and then gets a editor in his team to look at it to make sure its ontopic to just submit as if wrote by CSW
..its the only common sense, logical, timelime that make sense

Day 13.

Very short day today as Craig's council has decided not to bother cross examining several witnesses due to them obviously not going to help in Craig's favour. One person that was meant to be examined today was Rory Cellan-Jones who used to work for the BBC and was involved when Craig tried and failed to out himself to the BBC. He instead published a blog today about his experience with Craig: https://rorycellanjones.substack.com/p/the-battle-of-bitcoin

Craig still owes him 0.01701 BTC in bitcoin which was worth around £5 at the time but is now worth around £700. He should sue him to get it back  .

The Dr Bitcoin podcast also published an interview with Rory today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=secLQHfCaTI

Here's a list of people who will now not be appearing:





Another thing to note here is I don't think he does actually hire people. Passing the buck on to someone else is just part of his lie-arsenal now. How else can he explain away some plagiarism or dodgy backdating editing that is on his personal blog or papers or whatever else. He has to dream up a scenario where he is not responsible otherwise he's guilty and he's been caught in the act, and in court that's contempt which can land him in prison. As long as he passes the buck and sows enough doubt the courts may not bother prosecuting. Even if they did I'm sure Craig would just flee the country again to avoid trial/prosecution.

Fascinating Insider information from Christen Ager Hanssen regarding COPA -v- Craig Wright Case in UK High Court.

https://twitter.com/agerhanssen/status/1753779120540930101

https://mylegacykit.medium.com/ager-hanssen-i-have-been-in-many-wars-but-nothing-has-been-like-this-095147e1791e

  

The kind of security expert whose personal computer systems get hacked all the time. Every time someone exposes his lies with concrete evidence: "Someone else gained access to my PC!" Did you know that?

CSW game is simple

pretend to be famous. get a fan club, promise the fan club huge riches if they become loyal.. test loyalty by getting them to invest in him. delay all pay outs.. never pay out

if idiots/cultish people like HmmMAA(and others, .. and other of other cultish people of other cults) think that being loyal will make them rich..
and are years later still waiting for the kiss on the cheek and cheque in the hand.. realise it aint coming. it wont come

your idol is not a god.

CSW made promises of a large stash.. that he has no keys of.
CSW then made promises of selling licences of patents.. that never sold
        CSW made promises of court case compensation of defending reputation/patents that amounted to a candy lollipop
                CSW made promises of rights to life story, thats not even worth a fox 15minutes segment news story

win or lose CSW doesnt care because to him its just more content for his drama he wants to sell.. as either a hero or villain story(spoiler:villain)

His fanboys are delusional and will dream up some way to excuse it. If they had any brains they would have dumped him long ago. Many BSV-ers think Craig is playing some sort of 4D chess on a level even geniuses don't understand so they'll play this off as some sort of elaborate ruse by Craig. It's going to be interesting to see if Calvin Ayre dumps him after this. If Craig's funding gets cut I don't think he's gonna want to piss away his own funds on continuous and costly lawsuits. I also hope that the judge recommends prosecution for contempt against Craig and maybe even some of his lying witnesses. Keeping him in court fighting for his freedom would be the best outcome as he will have to concentrate on that rather than suing others. I really hope the ATO finally puts out a warrant for him as well. Having these sorts of legal pressures on him should weigh him down substantially and hopefully put him where he belongs.

Definitely a joke, heh.  Although maybe I shouldn't make jokes that might inspire him to commit his next scam.  It's certainly the kind of thing he'd attempt if he thought he could get away with it.

---

And he can keep 'em coming if he likes.  I'm quite relieved to hear it.  If someone that disreputable calls me a piece of shit, I just take it as confirmation that I'm on the correct side of of the moral divide here.  

If HmmMAA and I were getting along and finding common ground, then I'd be deeply concerned.    

---

We definitely didn't need it.  But it should now be far more difficult for Wright to maintain his little fanclub of 'SV'ers.  At some point the remaining fools will grow tired of people laughing at them and calling their intelligence and/or integrity into question.  To continue supporting SV now would mean someone would have to be either braindead or malicious.  

Day 12

Today was mostly taken up by Stefan Matthews who has been caught out in several lies already. Matthews claimed to have been given a draft copy of the whitepaper before it was public, but was shown an email sent from Craig with Stephan CC-ed that proves otherwise:

Here's an article published yesterday that lists lots of contradictions by Craig and his witnesses: https://whatthefinance.com/satoshi/sermon-of-contradictions-11th-testament

Adam Back and Martti Malmi are apparently up tomorrow.



This wasn't the only person they brought up in the trial. There was some other guy Craig alleged to have been in contact with but that guy was in a hospice at the time and his daughters confirmed he wasn't using or even able to use a computer at the time.


I mean, we didn't need that to know Craig is a fraud, but yeah, the trial should have just been closed early after that. I just wish they could pull out a laptop, link it up the the screen in the court and tell Craig to code bitcoin from scratch. That would be interesting.


What certificates? His fake degrees? They have already been through the plagiarism of one of his degrees. Craig blamed it on his editors and some other bullshit.


Who said he's a security expert? That's a title Craig has given himself, but given he gets hacked regularly when it's convenient for him as an excuse I'd say I'm more of a security expert than Craig.


Another thing I forgot to mention was COPA brought up Craig's patents. What Craig has actually done in most instances is merely add his name to existing patents. I.E. they were filled by others originally without Craig, but then amended later to include him. He has also been registering the patents in several jurisdictions to bolster the number he has, I.E. if he registers the same patent in the US, UK and wherever else then that is three patents for Craig as opposed to one. Regardless, and as I've always said, his worthless patents are irrelevant to this trial just like his qualifications.


He didn't even know what it was let alone what it does and that wasn't the only code he couldn't explain. He's a buffoon and it was over at that point for him, if it wasn't already given every bit of evidence has been found to be fraudulent and manipulated in some way. His witnesses are just making him look like a bigger bozo.