Topic: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial - page 9. (Read 4032 times)

I cited CG with its source link at the initial start, so as everyone knows how I stay updated with the court hearing between COPA and Dr. Wright.
I receive news letter as mails from the CG site and only thought it proper to share it, so anyone who needs to follow up would.

Perhaps my image sharing pisses you off, but it's not a yardstick to accuse me of supporting a shitcoin I clearly didn't speak about.

Unless you intend to gain from such obscure propaganda of pointing out a FUD where one doesn't really exist, then please help us understand why CG isn't a reputable source and is not to be trusted mostly as it concerns this COPA vs Wright case, where several opinions have been made and mine including yours may not even be valid in the long run.

cases were civil.. not criminal, so fines are involved not prison
however if a civil case can prove criminal act(forgery/fraud).. it becomes evidence.. THEN.. criminal charges can be filed if authorities get a criminal complaint with evidence..
.. watch this space

Why isn't this scamming crook in prison yet for committing a massive fraud on the court and repeatedly lying under oath?
 

So , as long they still have it in his degree's page it's valid . Correct ? As there's a chance there was no plagiarism .  If you have any update about the degree revoke case it would be nice to share . If not , i guess case is closed . There's been 3 1/2 years since then , i think unis work faster than agencies .

I'm glad that you are not biased at all
It's nice to see people moving goalposts , some years ago he wasn't even a guy with degrees . At least now it's recognised that he has many degrees and qualifications . I guess if somehow proves to be satoshi then maxis will say that's he's so qualified that probably hacked satoshi .

Day 7

Much more of the shaggy defence today (It wasn't me). Craig claims to have never personally posted one of his blogs, but had numerous "editors" doing so for him, so of course any backdated forgeries are not him but one of the various editors, only one he could recall the first name of.

Craig also claimed he was hacked by Ira Kleiman who planted backdated blogs to smear him. COPA's barrister KC Hough rebutted him "But this was before you even contact with Ira". Craig then claimed it was in fact Ira's lawyers. I'm surprised Craig hasn't claimed yet that his dog ate the original whitepaper/USB stick that the genesis block was on. He also claimed the ATO were the ones who leaked some of the forged documents.  


Can you link to his degree page because it says you need his full name and birthdate, but CSU has stated they're investigating the plagiarism:

https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2020/05/11/craig-wrights-doctoral-thesis-being-investigated-for-plagiarism/


But again, any qualifications Craig claims to have are irrelevant to him being Satoshi, especially when they've all come long after his claims. What Craig is is just a conman who rocks up in a nice car, flashy suit and tells you all about his many qualifications in order to gain trust. A man this intelligent couldn't possibly be a scam artist, but that's exactly what he is. Craig knows full well that nobody is going to believe him so he has to fake all his "proof" but when he gets caught out he blames everyone but himself, so now his last resort is hoping he can collect a load of qualifications to make out like he's a genius, and Satoshi was a genius, so craig must obviously be Satoshi.

And as part of my contribution of providing a counter to FUD, I'll again point out that the source of these "updates" is a website run by people funding Wright's sad little campaign of lawsuits against this very community and its developers.  Anything from 'CG' is not to be trusted as it is a BSV shitcoin site, not a Bitcoin site.  People citing CG as a reputable source are not to be trusted.

How about learning to post pictures that are the appropriate size for the forum? Otherwise, refrain from such posts, which do not benefit anyone, and only cause problems for everyone who has slow internet and limited data traffic.

In addition, you are promoting CW shitcoin and a website that directly supports this scammer

As part of my contribution to providing updates on this court case between Dr. Wright and COPA, here are some excerpt from the last hearing and it is more on the case of forged documents brought forward to question the authentication of Dr. Wrights claim.
I however still doubt Dr. Wright is Nakamoto even if he has several documents to show he was among the originators of most of Bitcoin's technical initiative such as the P2p mode of transaction used.

More evidence will be provided soonest during the next court hearing, so am staying glued and making my observation known accordingly.

i believe LeezHamilton went by a different forum username months-years ago... "bitcoinmoses". same crap different season

You guys do not know anything about the Bitcoin and Blockchain Invention story.  None of you really know the true facts behind the emergence and the advent of the Decentralised Digital Electronic Cash System which its  so-called mysterious inventor has pioneered.  You have no clues of anything at all.  You have found the Bitcoin Forum and Bitcoin Core and Blockchain all of a sudden and many of you have become millionaires and Billionaires and enjoying life  what your great grandfather and father never imagined.  

Do not think that I am a teenage girl and have no technical or economic background. I wish I could have an audience with you all to discuss the matter in relation to Bitcoin and Blockchain and of course regarding our Dr Craig Wright and his so-called W&K Limited and BSV and also his claim of Satoshi Nakamoto Identity.

Craig Wright even is not Dr Craig Wright He is just a great actor, which few secret service agents and fiat financial elites together have recruited him   to act as an actor. Everybody knows that he has no programming background. He can only speak In Front of few people what he learned from DOCCO,

Do you really want Craig to retire from his bold claim of Satoshi Nakamoto without extraordinary and concrete  proof for an extraordinary claim ?  Then wake up men ! if you are man  enough to bring the real Satoshi Nakamoto on the spot.  Come forward !  I will produce the real Satoshi Nakamoto in the Court, who will establish Craig Wright's position in the place where he is supposed to be.

Ask a very simple question to yourself ?  the man who created the Digital Currency industry, is he so stupid and greedy who is allegedly holding 1.1Million Bitcoin and doing nothing, when a man like Craig Steven Wright is trying to re-hijack Bitcoin and Blockchain its intellectual property rights ?

You all are here in the forum bloody scaring cats and mice. You do not have any knowledge of the real Satoshi Nakamoto.  He will return soon and will punish all those who are abusing his Bitcoin and Blockchain and its monetary credibility. Also will be awarded to those who are doing good works.  It was the law, that Thou shall not Fork Bitcoin, you have done it. Now you are staging COPA -v- Craig Wright to break rules and bringing British Judicial Laws to break the Blockchain to grant Craig Wight the right to take over the Bitcoin and Blockchain industry ? No it won't happen.  

Craig should be happy to do business under a limit. He has crossed the limit. It is time to bring the real Satoshi Nakamoto in the Court. Who will be the Third Party in the COPA versus Craig Wright Case.  This will solves all the problems. Hundreds of Thousands of journalists and millions of people wasting billions of Hours to find Satoshi Nakamoto by writing articles.   I am convinced it is time for Satoshi Nakamoto to reveal his identity on 14 February 2024 instead of 14 Feb. 2020 which was blocked by the CoronaVirus Pandemic.  

The real Satoshi Nakamoto has already requested Justice Lord Mellor to grant him permission to attend the Court as a Third Party. Tomorrow 13 February 2024, I will Publish the Official Letter of Satoshi Nakamoto in this Forum.  You will find a link below and find it.  

 

  

Let's move the BSV/BCH discussion in a more appropriate thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/heres-why-bchbsv-lovers-constantly-attack-btc-5484918

Jesus fucking Christ this guy could've just given up with trying to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto and we would've been okay with it (well not really cause we'd roast and cook the fuck outta him for a while but it's gonna die down unlike what we're doing to him right now) But he keeps on making himself look like a massive clown in front of the jury and in front of the people. Like at this point you would've guessed he's already given up on trying to quell the haters but NOO, he's out for blood as a court ruling's gonna change how we look at his ugly mug.

You guys are both getting off on a tangent right here. The discussion's all about whether the clown is Satoshi or not (which let's be real here, he's not man) and we got Mr. 95% CSW believer right here trynna prove something. Whether he got his doctorate or not doesn't matter. What matters is that he doesn't even own a single satoshi until 2013 as most sources state and as franky iterated which is a telltale sign that he's not Satoshi. Like I'm so surprised that even after all the metaphorical pants-shitting that CSW Faketoshi has done in the past up until now (including the fact that his panel's using his mental impairment as an angle to gain the court's sympathy which is a massive wtf for me) you'd think he's not gonna garner anymore delulu believers but here we got HmmMAA contradicting his very own statements. C'mon folks.

this copa case is not like the W&k case
COPA is actually challenging CSW. the other case of Ira was not about challenging but just setting a narrative.

COPA are trying to break CSW narrative

also it was CSW that first filed against COPA people. so due to CSW being in london, thats where the case lays

Hi, That is a good analogy.  I like your argument. The truth is far from this two parties pretending and debating of the fact if whether Dr CSW is Satoshi or Dr Fraud, This  arguments in the High Court in London is just a setup by Craig and the COPA organiser Jack Dorsey.

There is a hidden agenda of this case to file in London by COPA. They could have file the case in in US but they did not because they went no where in the Florida Case. So have chosen  London because, Satoshi Nakamoto is a British Economic scientist and he is a Londoner.

Tomorrow, there will be a twist. It is a twist of the Tricks of the Trade of the Bitcoin Drama.  

---

If Andreas Antonopoulos and Anthony Pompliano would have claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto jointly then that could have been a reasonable claim. COPA is challenging Craig but there is secret deal going on between this two sponsored by a third party.  

No matter,  whatever would be the out come, for as far as I am sure the real Satoshi will not come out and Challenge Craig unless it is necessary.

courts are mediators. where its for the defense and prosecution to show their sides and prove/disprove each other and the judge just chooses the winner of the dispute/debate based on what the dispute is about

yes courts can be abused.
take for instance the CSW vs Ira Kleiman

everyone knows in 2009-13 CSW had no bitcoin and not involved in it
everyone knows in 2010-11 got talking to am american guy called Dave and they set up W&K to (wright:scam - dave:apply for grants)  US gov defense grants. Dave K realised CSW was not going to offer real US defense services and distanced himself and discontinued communication with CSW
W&K had nothing to do with bitcoin, pre 2013

in 2013 CSW bought his first bitcoin but wanted to use W&K brand to now get involved in bitcoin because W&K was a US business he can take advantage over for US exchanging. but found out his ex-partner died. so took over the brand..
then later communicated with IRA to suggest they should both agree that W&K was worth billions and had some (false) patents involved.. as IRa would earn some money out of this agreement
so they both went to court acting like frenemies pretending they both agree that W&K had assets and value, but where the court filed dispute was purely on ownership stake of the brand.. just so CSW can start his proof of satoshi games in court. by getting the court to not make verdict on the W&K assets.. but just ownership % of brand thus in CSW view make him feel the court is proving W&K had assets because the judge didnt argue about proof of assets

yep
if both parties can secretly agree that a empty shell has crabs... even if the shell is actually empty. by both parties saying they agree the shell has crabs. but the dispute is only about who gets to hold the shell.. the judge does not check for crabs. thus people then (falsely) believe the shell has crabs, even if dispute is solely about who gets to hold the SHELL

---

again maybe you should catchup and gather actual sources rather than gather ketchup sauces

I have also read hitler's mein campf and quran , i guess my hands should be chopped off as a punishment .

I'll never understand why courts are considered "objective", since they're being ruled by (subjective) human beings with hidden agendas.

The exact same courts didn't declare mandatory lockdowns illegal... just sayin'.

I don't believe a single word that comes from them.

if you are reading ANYTHING from coingeek you already failed yourself. if you know enough about coingeek to know publishers names you know too much about them. by you admitting you previously relied on them and still read them. shows you are piling up on ketchup instead of gathering real sources(sauces)

as for your previous posts thinking CSW was smart and a candidate of satoshi due to intelligence. as hilariousetc just linked.. CSW not only used ghost writers to write his degree stuff, the stuff wrote were plagiarised. whole blocks of texts copy and pasted..  thus not showing any sign of individual intelligence/novel thinking.

he is cunning. has skills in forgery, but this does not translate to intelligence..
much like criminals have "street smarts" but get caught and put in prison.. does not translate to being smart enough to not get caught. they just have cunning to scam/steal enough to survive until caught. cunning is not equal to intelligence.
CSW is getting caught in court right now

You can check his qualifications for charles state university here https://alumni.csu.edu.au/benefits/verify-qualifications , craig wright 23-10-1970

Edit. If his doctorate was plagiarised after all the noise years ago i would expected that the university would have it withdrawn , i'm not sure if this can happen though , someone with knowledge on this might add something productive .

*One forged document

Of course we know that CSW has no real documents which he can use to prove he is Satoshi, so naturally he will try to submit fake ones. That's why expert witnesses are important, because they are able to call his bluff in a way that affects the court proceedings.

That is, assuming whoever is picked for an expert testimonial does not try to withhold evidence, to basically do what you just wrote.


Well at least he didn't believe that the plagiarism was caused by a "malfunctioning Microsoft Word editor"... JFC.