Topic: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial - page 10. (Read 3835 times)

Just wow. I believed the answer to my question would be a "no", and that you just supported big blocks. I mean, we had our disagreements about block size and privacy in the past, but believing with certainty that CSW is Satoshi? That assertion goes beyond the extreme of the fallacies.

I don't have anything in response. Just look at the mountains of evidence of Craig being a pathetic liar and actively submitting forgeries, which you must be ignoring.

HmmMAA & LeezHamilton's information "sources"(pronounced for satire) are closer to ketchup, not credible

fun fact
even going back as far as CSW's first public appearance (in that panel you speak of).. bitcoin belle later opened up, admitted and debunks many things about CSW, she admits she was duped into introducing him to the "big players" of bitcoin via his conniving tactics

Back in 2016 i thought it might be him based on the body language after breakdown . I had already watched the bitcoin belle panel and bitcoin doco documentary which intrigued me . Later i started researching with others and found that he was not as incompetent as the majority said . The things that added to my opinion that he possibly is was his series about how bitcoin works , whitepaper , small world networks , philosophy and more . This guy is definitely a polymath and a really sharp mind . People in here will laugh with this but it's common for those that just stick to others opinions because they are too lazy to do some proof of work (sick ) .
At this point i'm 95% certain that he is satoshi or was one of the architects behind the pseudonym . The last 5% will be either a significant proof like a receipt of bitcoin.org purchase or something significant like what he mentioned in the trial that there is a steganographic message in the whitepaper which only satoshi could know . A public signing message will be insignificant after that and probably people will understand why he chose to do it this way .
Of course there is the case that none of this happens and i'm just wrong , but that doesn't mean that the process is wrong .

Your assumption is that he has no other ways to prove who he is and that satoshi is anonymous while it's just a pseudonym .  And based on that assumption you think that he should do what most people want which is to sign . By doing that he's admitting that what most think is the right thing to do . He choose to do it the hard way , and if he can't he will be discredited and possibly go to jail .
Joseph Vaughn-Perling said in one of his interviews back in 2016 :
"The world can learn much from what he has done and how. He is showing what cryptography does and does not do. It is a lesson that the world needs to learn before mass adoption can occur."
"People do not understand what cryptography does and does not do. People do not understand pseudonymous. Having a key means you have a key. It does not mean you had it previously, or that you will have it in the future."

You should read and listen about what Ian Grigg has said about identity and the problems with PGP keys . You have a false impression of how identity works .

I disagree , not everyone can be satoshi . I can't be , as i don't have the technical skills . You too even with more skills . Probably 99.9 % of the community doesn't have the skills . Don't fall to the childish motos of maxi's like we are all satoshi or wagmi . That's for 5yo's .

Edit. I think i missread your last quote , did i ? My english suck . I totally agree .

Wow, now it's a planted documents that's being a defense against the litigation. The holes in his story just keeps getting bigger and bigger day by day, it seems that there's no other for Craig now but to admit I guess, this is probably a last ditch effort to try and delay the case as there's going to be an investigation that the documents that proves him to be Satoshi are planted by Hanssen, totally weird that he trusts someone on his computer and that he didn't know that it was compromised, goes to show that he's a big fat liar.

You are an interesting person. No, I do not think the way you have described here, I was reading you many post. Actually I am a reader, I am not a BTC buyer or trader, I am just a SR. I like too do what you said but have no much time for it.  Can teach me some technical thing if you have some time for me ? 

Real Satoshi is an Angel. He has nothing to do with business world people or money mongers or criminal. Satoshi first created rBitcoin in the Reddit in back May 2007.  you can look for Metadata of rBitcoin of Reddit. Satoshi did not created Reddit.

A Request: My friend like to create Bitcoin address offline, which software or BTC address generator is good for her ?  I am not a technical person. I know only Journalism. Thanks for your comments. 

i know ur trolling.. but its a laugh to think you even want to attempt to now say satoshi is also a reddit creator and wire fraud convicted guy
maybe its time u stop wasting your life wanting criminals to be satoshi and actually spend some time learning about how bitcoin works and how facts work and do something with yourself to better your life and prospects

Satoshi had 2 PGP keys with MIT server. Aaron Swartz hacked MIT to destroy Satoshi's PGP Keys. Aaron Swartz is not dead as his dead donkey drama were staged to fool the government. His full names then was Aaron David Swartz but he has dropped Aaron from his names and now he is known  by is last two names. Any one can fool any one but not their own grandfather.

Satoshi does not need to prove anything to any one and he is not craving for a Nobel Prize in economic.

Do you really believe he is Satoshi? Let's leave the court asides for a moment. Do you find the overall "evidence" convincing to you?

No, but if you claim to be me, and you have no other ways to prove such a thing (like a drivers license), then a signed message from the PGP is at least required. You can't claim to be an anonymous person with no evidence apart from forgeries. Satoshi, whoever he is, posted a PGP key. This, along with the genesis public key, are the only elements which can certify his identity. Beyond that, not much else is known about him.

You can't treat potentially everyone as Satoshi. Everyone is not Satoshi until proven otherwise. And as time goes by, these signed messages will count even less as solid evidence due to the development of quantum computing which will sooner or later be used to compromise his keys.

as expected.. nothing new. he done same tactic with ATO in 2014

heres my theory
Christen Ager-Hanssen invested into CSW scam over the years (financially or sweat equity of promised returns. and now wanted out). and CSW/CSW sponsors like Ayres said "if you act like a disgruntled employee and cause some social drama leaking things that will cause a media storm to get my name viral again, to make me news worthy and notable again ill pay you, and you can be made whole and exit with a golden handshake" (paid dupe)
as that too is not a new trick of CSW

Day five:

More of the same from Craig today as he has been playing more of the blame game and pleading the Shaggy Defence (it wasn't me) and everyone but him is responsible for the faked documents he has submitted in evidence of him being Satoshi. Today he claimed Christen Ager-Hanssen basically hacked into not only his computer to plant faked documents to frame him but that he also hacked his phone and had access to all his personal communications such as emails and whatsapp messages for months. Quite impressive to hack both devices of one of the world's most leading security experts and for Craig not to know he was being monitored for such a length of time.

Craig also got a telling off for reportedly speaking with Australian Financial Review during the trial. In fairness to him it did look like they ensnared him on his way out and spun a offhand comment into an entire article, that is if you believe Craig, which we all know the answer to that question but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here.

There's a couple of Craig Wright bingo cards for anyone watching and wants to play along:

https://twitter.com/Twentynothing00/status/1755921531568296360


https://twitter.com/THBitcoinBuddha/status/1755909856093962444


If anyone wants a recap of the first few days of the trail the excellent Dr Bitcoin podcast has done an hour episode covering some of the juiciest bits and it's well worth a listen rather than just watching the stream or reading tweets etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOnnlLm8_9c

Trial is adjourned until Monday. Will be back with updates then.


You can request a link to the stream but you need to give them your full name. Not sure why it isn't fully public but maybe they don't want people recording and sharing it en mass. It's not terribly exciting unless you enjoy listing to Craig waffle on about irrelevant bullshit. I'm sure it will get spicier once the expert witnesses are called.

If nothing else, this thread is certainly giving me some new names for my distrust list.  Maybe it's a good thing it's not a self-moderated topic.  The vermin seem more eager to out themselves this way.  Obvious BSV shills are obvious.

~LeezHamilton
~Cryptomultiplier
~HmmMAA

The COPA - v- Dr Craig Wright Litigation is a very high profile litigation in history.

Without an extra ordinary evidence Dr Craig Wright and his barrister will be embarrassed. No body knows what will happen next week. But I have got a Prophecy, which will be an extra ordinary twist.

Read my prophecy. Click the link bellow.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5484503

Comment on my twist, bet on it, you might get 1.1 BTC as a bona fide gift from the twister Satoshi Nakamoto  

  

If someone had stolen Satoshi's keys, chances are he would try to liquidate his huge stash (1.100.000 BTC) either to become rich (in terms of USD/EUR) and/or to destroy BTC's reputation (with a sharp drop in fiat valuation).

Also, nobody has revealed Satoshi's identity so far, but HmmMAA claims it's a covert NSA/CIA conspiracy (they "know" who Satoshi is, but they just won't tell anyone, even though we know governments want to destroy BTC).

And yet, you're here to judge others and claim that you have some sort of "technical expertise".

Wanna tell us what's your expertise? What do you do for a living in the real world? (I don't want to reveal it for you)

 The UK Court should have allowed relaying the full livestream for media coverage. Why the court has taken such decision is confusing, may be not for others but is for myself.  Ultimately COPA will win the case.

not surprised at all, not first time he played this trick
knowing that millions of legal costs are at risk. i would not even be surprised if he paid off a loyal fan girl to play disgruntled to later say they messed with CSW files. again not first time he pays people to play act a bit of drama to push his agenda

 
 This is very simple, if is real Satoshi and started mining bitcoin since January 2009 and he is continuously mining Bitcoin then what are the odd ?  Why he is trying to become Japanese pseudonym ?  I gave him a pseudonym Professor Faustus.  or Dr Faustus in the Twitter. 

He should be happy with that pseudonym and conduct business to help the crypto community. Instead, he cited hate to the Satoshi Nakamoto when he first time created his internet blog back in 2016. I have not forgotten that.  This case is highly a orchestrated Bitcoin saga drama regarding a man's pseudonym  who created the Bitcoin Decentralised financial service industry. 

Satoshi is not hiding at all, he is watching and thinking what is his next  move. He is the chess master. If craig stop his crusade and become an ally top the bitcoin community then things will good for him and for every ones else.

He should be grateful to Satoshi Nakamoto who planned to invite him back in 2007 to work with Satoshi.

I fear that CSW somehow prepares himself for a next step. I don't know if that's possible, but maybe he just tries to find out all the "problems" his "doctored" "evidence" documents have so he can make better ones next time, under the next jurisdiction.
At least this is my conclusion from what I've read on the matter until now.

Day four

Day four has now concluded. As usual Craig has been blaming everyone but himself for the forgeries. He admitted today that several documents are in fact fraudulent, but passed the buck onto disgruntled ex-employees who are trying to make him look "incompetent". No Craig, you make yourself look incompetent. Not sure why he's using these documents as part of his defence but I guess he needs to backtrack once they get exposed as faked. They also went into the Tulip Trust nonsense and brought up his ATO tax issues.

Craig has also claimed the Kleiman court case where he was ordered to pay billions was one of the best things that happened to him as his outburst lead him to seek anger management. Craig will take very opportunity to grab some sympathy.

Also of note some BSV-tard shared a screenshot of holdnaut attending proceedings on twitter, thus being in contempt of court. The judge warned that access to the live stream may be cut if it happens again. Seems like it would be in the interest of BSV-ers to have the stream terminated so I'm not sure why one bad actor should penalise everyone else. Hopefully the person is prosecuted.


Another note: Craig has literally claimed to be one of the world's leading IT security experts, yet he's been hacked more times than I can count. Some of the excuses he comes up with to explain the hacks are also fanciful. See the Pineapple hack:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10PAgBTPt60
https://mylegacykit.medium.com/will-craig-wrights-purchase-order-forgery-blow-up-the-pineapple-hack-lawsuit-8ae4da6fffdb
https://fullycrypto.com/craig-wright-ordered-to-pay-430000-in-pineapple-case


You can even read the ridiculous story on Coingeek:

https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-stolen-bitcoin-heres-what-went-down/


The hacks are obviously convenient excuses to cover up lies he made up to cover up previous lies.

he wasnt a forensics expert
heck he cant even forge his own documents correctly so doesnt know much about forensics to cover his own lies
also when he created companies like "info defense"/"hotwire" he was not actually offering any real services. didnt even have a server farm of super computers, he was just creating shell companies scamming both the australian and american governments for R&D grants/tax rebates.. the american gov never gave him any money and his partner seen early the scam and stepped away. but he did manage to scam the australian government and got caught(and ran off)

..
added note of future prospects of CSW drama
CSW filed forged documents to australian gov over years and got caught.., however CSW and his then team then tried to suggest the documents he filed with australians gov were THEN edited where he blamed the australian government for falsifying/editing the documents..
so as i said in earlier post i expect him to later suggest he will say(probably, as its his style) that he had originals, but at filing someone else edited the files either an assistant of his at filing or the UK courts edited it at receipt and presented him at court with edited documents

I was neutral to Craig being Satoshi until he continually proves he's not time and time again. Currently there's zero verifiable evidence of Craig being Satoshi yet hundreds of documents proving he's a fraud. You seem to want me to remain neutral despite the overwhelming evidence that suggest otherwise. Should I remain neutral to Craig having a time machine to collect a notepad proven to be from the future?


His qualifications seem to either be non-existent or at best obtained via plagiarism, so therefore his qualifications are useless, not that qualifications mean anything anyway. The real Satoshi could be a high school drop out for all we know. Craig seems to get these qualifications purely as a way to bolster his credibility, when in fact they do the opposite when he's obtained them through fraud.


Shouldn't you be remaining neutral to Meta/Facebook's involvement. I'm sure Meta's involvement is financial to ensure bitcoin and blockchain tech remains free to use, but I don't care either way. I'm just glad someone with very deep pockets is involved so COPA can afford to keep Craig in court for as long as it takes.


Charles Sturt University has confirmed they never handed Craig a PHD:


I just wish COPA would pull out a laptop, sit it in front of Craig and tell him to code bitcoin from scratch and see what he comes up with. I'd be very surprised if he could come up with something even remotely feasible.