Topic: **US** BitFury Setup Guide - page 4. (Read 53265 times)
Thanks Doff will try all those suggestions.
First try a different ethernet cable its possible it may be bad. Its not able to bring your Ethernet interface up which could mean a lot of things possibly even a bad Network jack on the PI. However I would try a different cable first.
Also try to see if you can bring it up manually.
You can also use Nano to edit the interface file yourself withAnd then add these lines below to the file, however change it to your Network IPs and DNS of your ISP.
This will statically assign your IP to eth0
Hope this helps.
Also try to see if you can bring it up manually.
Code:
sudo ifup eth0
You can also use Nano to edit the interface file yourself with
Code:
sudo nano /etc/network/interfaces
This will statically assign your IP to eth0
Code:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.10
gateway 192.168.1.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
dns-nameserver 208.67.220.220 208.67.222.222
Hope this helps.
Finally decided to grab the image file from the OP. All looked fine until I booted up, seems it doesnt like my network although all my rigs using usb miners run error free
also noticed that the new image removes the 'configure ip' and 'shutdown' from the web gui interface for bitfury, is this to be expected?
thoughts?
also noticed that the new image removes the 'configure ip' and 'shutdown' from the web gui interface for bitfury, is this to be expected?
thoughts?
Code:
speed:1696 noncerate[GH/s]:15.748 (0.492/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:23.570 good:110 errors:856 spi-err:0 miso-err:5 duplicates:59 jobs:60 cores:0% good:32 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Thu Nov 21 17:07:11 2013
board-2 speed nrate hrate good errors spi-err miso-er duplic good bad off per chip good cores
0: 848 5.727 9.618 40 380 0 3 36 16 0 0 (0.358/chip) 0%
1: 848 10.022 13.952 70 476 0 2 23 16 0 0 (0.626/chip) 1%
pi@10-10-10-249:/run/shm$
Same results with one board... here's my latest from swapping the boards.
Try running them at a lower speed than 53. Maybe start at 49 and work up from there.
I changed it to 49. It ramped up to 60. Stayed there for longer than normal, hovered around 45 then back down to 18 or 20. I am really at a loss here.
I forgot to say to turn off autotune as well. Depending on your chainminer version, it may have ramped up the speed setting until the VRM overloaded.
And if miso errors are always coming from specific chips, turn those chips off.
Also, check the console output of chainminer and see if it's having any problems with the proxy (lots of queue messages).
which pool are you on? what setting?
Code:
speed:1696 noncerate[GH/s]:15.748 (0.492/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:23.570 good:110 errors:856 spi-err:0 miso-err:5 duplicates:59 jobs:60 cores:0% good:32 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Thu Nov 21 17:07:11 2013
board-2 speed nrate hrate good errors spi-err miso-er duplic good bad off per chip good cores
0: 848 5.727 9.618 40 380 0 3 36 16 0 0 (0.358/chip) 0%
1: 848 10.022 13.952 70 476 0 2 23 16 0 0 (0.626/chip) 1%
pi@10-10-10-249:/run/shm$
Same results with one board... here's my latest from swapping the boards.
Try running them at a lower speed than 53. Maybe start at 49 and work up from there.
I changed it to 49. It ramped up to 60. Stayed there for longer than normal, hovered around 45 then back down to 18 or 20. I am really at a loss here.
How do I find out what the settings in the interfaces file should be?
edit /etc/networking/interfaces
You should see something like this:
Code:
address 192.168.254.17
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.254.0
boadcast 192.168.254.255
gateway 192.168.254.1
Now, to figure out what you should have for netmask, broadcast, and gateway, you can open a command prompt in Windows and type:
Code:
ipconfig /all
Look for those values (probably have to scroll up).
How do I find out what the settings in the interfaces file should be?
OK - that no route to host means your gateway is probably set incorrectly in the interfaces file. That, or the subnet mask. I fixed it and that solved an early problem.
think Im getting close. Looks like its my network settings. When I look at the output of one of the screens I see this
'no route to host'
'no route to host'
And bitfury's accounts/RMA team has gone radio silent. RMA was supposed to be processed days ago and now I can't even get a response. Is this normal for them?
Dave has sent me several emails over the last 2 days in an effort to get my cards working. Quite happy with the level of customer service from them so far.
Code:
speed:1696 noncerate[GH/s]:15.748 (0.492/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:23.570 good:110 errors:856 spi-err:0 miso-err:5 duplicates:59 jobs:60 cores:0% good:32 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Thu Nov 21 17:07:11 2013
board-2 speed nrate hrate good errors spi-err miso-er duplic good bad off per chip good cores
0: 848 5.727 9.618 40 380 0 3 36 16 0 0 (0.358/chip) 0%
1: 848 10.022 13.952 70 476 0 2 23 16 0 0 (0.626/chip) 1%
pi@10-10-10-249:/run/shm$
Same results with one board... here's my latest from swapping the boards.
Try running them at a lower speed than 53. Maybe start at 49 and work up from there.
And bitfury's accounts/RMA team has gone radio silent. RMA was supposed to be processed days ago and now I can't even get a response. Is this normal for them?
Code:
speed:1696 noncerate[GH/s]:15.748 (0.492/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:23.570 good:110 errors:856 spi-err:0 miso-err:5 duplicates:59 jobs:60 cores:0% good:32 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Thu Nov 21 17:07:11 2013
board-2 speed nrate hrate good errors spi-err miso-er duplic good bad off per chip good cores
0: 848 5.727 9.618 40 380 0 3 36 16 0 0 (0.358/chip) 0%
1: 848 10.022 13.952 70 476 0 2 23 16 0 0 (0.626/chip) 1%
pi@10-10-10-249:/run/shm$
Same results with one board... here's my latest from swapping the boards.
Hi Ben,
i have measured now. The Result, exactly 12.0 V
In the meantime i have tried a compeltely another 1200W Power Supply with it, but still the same.
Is it possible the image/linux has a problem ?
i have measured now. The Result, exactly 12.0 V
In the meantime i have tried a compeltely another 1200W Power Supply with it, but still the same.
Is it possible the image/linux has a problem ?
I also see this when I boot pi, but not every time
That 'bad: 32' does that mean both boards arrived doa?
That 'bad: 32' does that mean both boards arrived doa?
What results do you get with just one h-board? (try one, and then try the other)
I've got a bitfury unit with 2 cards. However, together they are only spitting out 25GHs rather than 50. I've got logs, etc. if they are helpful to post, and not sure how to troubleshoot this. When I restart the miner, it spins up to 60, but within 20 - 30 secs it's back down.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
You've got miso errors (which indicates bad communication to the chips). Either a card isn't seated properly, or you've got a bad card/board. Try 1 card at a time and see what results you get.
Code:
[11/18/2013 11:07:44 PM] 1: 1 aIfDSo 52 0.827 0.611 21 0 0 2 0 21 [0:0] 735 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 aIfDSo 52 0.394 0.640 10 0 0 0 1 22 [0:1] 746 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 aIfDSo 52 0.355 0.640 9 0 0 0 1 22 [0:2] 747 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 aIfDSo 52 0.670 0.640 17 0 0 0 0 22 [0:3] 739 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 aIfDSo 52 0.433 0.640 11 0 0 0 1 22 [0:4] 745 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 aIfDSo 52 0.788 0.640 20 0 0 0 2 22 [0:5] 736 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 aIfDSo 52 0.670 0.640 17 0 0 0 2 22 [0:6] 739 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 aIfDSo 52 0.670 0.582 17 0 0 0 0 20 [0:7] 739 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 aIfDSo 52 0.433 0.669 11 1 0 0 2 23 [0:8] 745 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 aIfDSo 52 0.630 0.611 16 1 0 1 0 21 [0:9] 740 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 aIfDSo 52 0.276 0.611 7 0 0 0 2 21 [0:A] 749 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 aIfDSo 52 0.512 0.640 13 0 0 0 2 22 [0:B] 743 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 aIfDSo 52 0.591 0.611 15 0 0 0 1 21 [0:C] 741 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 aIfDSo 52 0.749 0.611 19 0 0 0 3 21 [0:D] 737 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 aIfDSo 52 0.591 0.611 15 0 0 0 0 21 [0:E] 741 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 aIfDSo 52 0.394 0.640 10 0 0 0 0 22 [0:F] 746 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 aIfDSo 52 0.709 0.582 18 0 0 2 2 20 [1:0] 739 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 aIfDSo 52 0.433 0.582 11 0 0 0 0 20 [1:1] 745 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 aIfDSo 52 0.946 0.582 24 0 0 0 2 20 [1:2] 732 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 aIfDSo 52 0.355 0.553 9 0 0 0 1 19 [1:3] 747 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 aIfDSo 52 0.433 0.582 11 0 0 0 0 20 [1:4] 745 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 aIfDSo 52 0.552 0.582 14 0 0 0 0 20 [1:5] 743 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 aIfDSo 52 0.552 0.582 14 0 0 0 1 20 [1:6] 742 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 aIfDSo 52 0.552 0.582 14 0 0 0 0 20 [1:7] 742 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 aIfDSo 52 0.473 0.611 12 0 0 0 0 21 [1:8] 744 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 aIfDSo 52 0.473 0.553 12 0 0 0 1 19 [1:9] 744 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 aIfDSo 52 0.670 0.582 17 0 0 0 2 20 [1:A] 739 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 aIfDSo 52 0.709 0.611 18 0 0 0 4 21 [1:B] 738 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
29 aIfDSo 52 0.552 0.582 14 0 0 0 2 20 [1:C] 742 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 aIfDSo 52 0.394 0.611 10 0 0 0 1 21 [1:D] 746 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 aIfDSo 52 0.355 0.553 9 0 0 0 0 19 [1:E] 747 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 aIfDSo 52 0.552 0.611 14 0 0 0 0 21 [1:F] 742 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1664 noncerate[GH/s]:17.692 (0.553/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:19.374 good:449 errors:2 spi-err:0 miso-err:5 duplicates:33 jobs:180 cores:2% good:32 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Mon Nov 18 18:34:58 2013
board-2 speed nrate hrate good errors spi-err miso-er duplic good bad off per chip good cores
0: 832 8.984 10.036 228 2 0 3 17 16 0 0 (0.561/chip) 2%
1: 832 8.708 9.338 221 0 0 2 16 16 0 0 (0.544/chip) 2%
My good cores are at 2%, and I am down to less than 9 GH/s. I'm wondering the same thing...
Here is my pool setup and output of sudo screens
I also see this when I boot pi, but not every time
That 'bad: 32' does that mean both boards arrived doa?
I also see this when I boot pi, but not every time
That 'bad: 32' does that mean both boards arrived doa?
I've got a bitfury unit with 2 cards. However, together they are only spitting out 25GHs rather than 50. I've got logs, etc. if they are helpful to post, and not sure how to troubleshoot this. When I restart the miner, it spins up to 60, but within 20 - 30 secs it's back down.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Jump to: