Topic: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? - page 58. (Read 45532 times)

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

The more serious methods of treatment are chemo, surgery, and radiation. Once these have been completed, most patients are dead.

Saving cancer patients who have been diagnosed with only a couple of weeks to live, is for the heavy duty nutrition, like at the Gerson Institute (http://gerson.org/gerpress/).

The BS will stop only when you stop it. Have you seen any medical bring back a loved one?

Vitamin C and D3 will strengthen the immune system so that much of the medical isn't needed. And this is only a little tip of the protection we can get from nutrition.

Please stop spreading the BS that the medical wants to help anyone.

Vitamins can only strengthen immunity in order to prevent the body from getting cancer, but when the body is already sick with cancer, more serious methods for treatment are needed.

Yeah yeah yeah
Vitamin C and D3 can cure cancer and brin back the love one.
Could we stop spreading such bullshit?

Simple vitamin C and D3 in combination strengthen the immune system.

If as much study went into nutrition as goes into medicine, nobody would ever need a doctor. As an example...


Ginger Destroys Cancer Cells More Effectively than Cancer Drugs







Read more at http://www.naturalnewsblogs.com/ginger-destroys-cancer-cells-effectively-cancer-drugs/.

At us many doctors cooperate with the pharmaceutical companies and try to appoint specially a heap of unnecessary medicines to earn more money. A vaccine is sometimes needed, but not in this way

This isn't exactly true. A doctor starts out trusting the system. He is there to help people and make money at the same time. By the time he finds out that the system isn't quite right, he has a family to support. The family idea, and the helping people idea, are two things that keep him trying to make the system work correctly.

Many doctors have turned to nutrition in their private practice. If the medical knew what they were doing, they might yank their license.

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Exactly. I was asked once why I vaccinate my dogs and not myself. Other than most facilities require proof of vaccines, if my dog turns into an idiot it only makes him cute. It doesn't fuck up his entire ability to fend for himself in the future.

The propaganda tells them that unless 70% 85% 90% 95% 97% of people are vaccinated 'we' won't have 'herd immunity' and sickness will sweep through.

I guess they didn't stop to think 'sweep through what?' if so many people are supposedly immune.

I guess they also didn't stop to think that other countries which don't vaccinate to our schedules don't seem to have 'epidemics'....although half a dozen people getting sick at Disneyland constitutes an epidemic of existential proportions to these nit-wits as long as the mainstream media says it is so.

The vaxxers say they are protecting the 'weak' in our society who are not strong enough to be vaccinated (even though vaccines are so safe that it is crazy to question them and there are no 'tests' given to see who can handle them and who cannot.)  I'll tell you who cannot handle the vaccines:  The affluent class who have the money to pay off a private doctor and get a waiver.  It is kind of true, though, that their kids need to be able to perform against other non-damaged affluent kids in ivy-league schools and after that in a professional vocations.  It is unfair to compare them to kids who are going to grow up to a career as a checker at 7-11.

Right.

I mean, if vaccinations worked, why would any vaccinated person be afraid of a sick person? He couldn't transmit the disease to the vaccinated person... if vaccination worked, right?

Pro vaxxer: Vaccinations work!
Pro vaxxer: don't infect me bro
(even though supposedly vaccines work).

Just saying so, doesn't make it happen. The medical won't do the studies where they compare vaccinated against non-vaccinated in all the ways that it will take to see if the vaccination works or not. .

And this is why we try to educate people.

Today's opinions are so easily backed by the force of guns.

If I m am vaccinated against Polio, then the chances of me getting that disease is less than 0.000000001%. The chances of dying from it are even lower. Now compare the unvaccinated. The percentage is much higher.

And vaccinated folks get sick all the time. A few of them die from it. What's the use of getting vaccinated if you are going to die from it?

In a sense, you propose to deprive a person of choice. It is not correct. There is always a chance that non-vaccinated people cannot get sick. I think it would be better if those who refuse vaccination will be forced to insure. If the person is not sick his insurance needs to be paid to his family after his death.

I few years ago I would have considered certain 'BADecker-ish' things to be totally nuts where now I consider them in the very possible category.  One of these is the conjecture that some of the most influential people in the driver's seats are genuine Luciferians.  This would include a certain fairly small segment at the top of the pharmaceutical industry.  For this reason I did put some effort into trying to figure out what makes these people tick.

One fascinating theory which seems to match up with observations quite well is that they actually do have an ethical principle which can be paraphrased as so:

 - People must have at least the theoretical ability to know what's happening to them.  Failure to object implies consent.

This would explain the vaccine inserts which very few people read, but which state that, for instance, no studies have been done on pregnant women, and they vaccines can cause a wide variety of problems up to and including death.  It would also help explain why it is actually not that difficult to find information making it pretty clear what is going on (historical fiction, whistle-blowers, presentations by doctors who've bowed out of the system, etc) if one does a little bit of looking.

The philosophy seems to be that there is no obligation that things need to be turned into a 'for dummies' book...just that information is available.

A corollary seems to be that if there is a 'proxy' which supplies muscle, then the original offender is off the hook.  In practice this means that if a population can be propagandized into, say, demanding that their peers are assaulted, then a project is ethically acceptable on the part of the designers.

The basis for a lot of these principles seem to be expressed fairly clearly in un-edited versions of the Babylonian Talmud.  This body of philosophical thought seems to be the basis for Kabbalah which itself seems to be the basis for a variety of esoteric spin-off philosophies.  In part, perhaps, because Kabbalah was kind of exclusive to Hebrew speakers (until recently) and other's had a desire to get in on the action.

Anyway, that's kind of where my fairly recent research is pointing me.