Pages:
Author

Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 98. (Read 1153678 times)

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
No more than 8 characters.
It's a bit more nuanced than that.  You can certainly generate longer ones:
Code:
vanitygen 1abcdefghijkLmnopqrstuvwxyz
Difficulty: 164888818503458230623158005923420463190199545920
[830.19 Kkey/s][total 6228992][Prob 0.0%][50% in 4.365470e+033y]
Except that it would take, on average, a very very very very very long time.

But 9 characters is perfectly doable - this is on a not-all-that-beefy laptop:
Code:
oclvanitygen64 -p 1 1abcdefgh
Difficulty: 2988734397852220
[5.39 Mkey/s][total 75497472][Prob 0.0%][50% in 12.2y]
I still wouldn't want to wait 12 years, but if you do.. why not.

Moreover, it's an 'on average'.  It's possible you could get a hit a split second after you call the command, and it's also possible it would take centuries to get a hit.

Note that this is if you absolutely must generate one for whatever reason.  If you're talking about mining, then perhaps a 'maximum prefix' would be contingent upon profitability, in which case you'd have to consider whether the bounty equals or exceeds your expenses for vanity mining - and that is a calculation that is, again, subject to that 'on average' caveat.

The only theoretical limit is, I think, 30 (including the leading '1'), as that's when you exhaust the number of characters available in a bitcoin address to begin with.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?

No more than 8 characters.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
Trying to do some mining with vanity gen on vanity pool, [...] tried finding it in the thread, but after browsing the pages could not find the info.

You must have missed the first post:

Code:
$ ./oclvanityminer -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com/ -a 1samr7UZxtC6MEAFHqr1h3Kq453xJJbe4

So on windows, your .bat file would look something like:
Code:
oclvanityminer64.exe -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress
Or
Code:
start "Vanity Miner: Pool" /low oclvanityminer64.exe -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress
To give it a nice window caption and slightly deprioritize the process.

If it's not working, I recommend that you try to get oclvanitygen working first - in case there's any issues using it with your card or having to select the right OpenCL platform.
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 101
Hi,

Trying to do some mining with vanity gen on vanity pool, but i am having a hard time with it.

I am on windows 8.1, got a Radeon R9 270x card and Xeon E3 cpu, could someone please post an example of the bat file to start the miner?

Also tried finding it in the thread, but after browsing the pages could not find the info.

thanks in advance!
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Hi, I was wondering if someone could help me.

Is there a parameter for vanitygen to stop it from outputting stuff to the console?
I want it to run on the background of my ubuntu server, so I use './vanitygen -i 1jerodev &', but it keeps sending things to the console and it is verry anoying.

Thanks for helping,
Jerodev.

i have the same problem, does anyone can use it on background?? :S
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Never mind, using older drivers fixed it.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I'm constantly getting mismatched GPU/CPU hashes with oclvanitygen on my Windows (10) x64 Tech preview with Nvidia GTX 660 Ti and driver v344.11

e.g.
Quote
oclvanitygen.exe -v 1abc

Prefix difficulty:              4553521 1abc
Difficulty: 4553521
Device: GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation (10de)
Driver: 344.11
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.1 CUDA
Max compute units: 7
Max workgroup size: 1024
Global memory: -2147483648
Max allocation: 536870912
OpenCL compiler flags: -DPRAGMA_UNROLL -cl-nv-verbose
Loading kernel binary dda8fd690f1d7ccbbb3690e8ae52b4f6.oclbin
Grid size: 3584x2048
Modular inverse: 7168 threads, 1024 ops each
Using OpenCL prefix matcher
Match idx: 0
CPU hash: 4c4d139270e27dab4ab9a3de0b671d7a68c25e58
GPU hash: 065a9e86f02103a24fcdf5c88b4f6605d6dc3851
Found delta: 6607128 Start delta: 1
[5.70 Mkey/s][total 7340032][Prob 80.1%][90% in 0.6s]                          Match idx: 0
CPU hash: 1b1c77d0f608eb3ff10341abb770c6f0994b3de6
GPU hash: 065a9e7012412266e26eb740bf195c3ab70b7d0b

I hope someone can help me get this running properly. I have searched for answers to no avail.
sr. member
Activity: 807
Merit: 251
World's First Crowd Owned Cryptocurrency Exchange
yup too late  Grin
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Wow, I found this too late. It is truely good for those who want to have a personalized address. Cheers!
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 11
I tried to search for a specific wallet address just for fun, and it the program crashed. It was not until i removed 6 characters from the end of the public address did it do its thing. I know the chances of finding 1 specific public address is like winning the lottery 500 times in a row but i would like to be able to. Is my hardware the problem or the code?
In order to speed up code execution the final step, adding the checksum to the result is skipped.
This checksum is 32 bit, equivalent to 6-7 characters in base58.

You may want to run with the regular expression option, in this mode the checksum part is added.
Code execution will slow down considerable though.

My code actually reports the prefix being to too long when using a complete address in stead of crashing,
there are many versions out there :-).
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
I tried to search for a specific wallet address just for fun, and it the program crashed. It was not until i removed 6 characters from the end of the public address did it do its thing. I know the chances of finding 1 specific public address is like winning the lottery 500 times in a row but i would like to be able to. Is my hardware the problem or the code?
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Great software , all hail to opensourcing
legendary
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
Do any of you guys have a link to the version of Vanitygen that ouputs in .csv format. (address,key)?

I downloaded it over 6 months ago from somewhere and my hard drive died. i didnt back up the .csv Vanity as i figured i could just re DL it, but now i cannot seem to find the link...
Solved here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vanitygen-ouptut-to-csv-802949
Its good for all quote this thread
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
Do any of you guys have a link to the version of Vanitygen that ouputs in .csv format. (address,key)?

I downloaded it over 6 months ago from somewhere and my hard drive died. i didnt back up the .csv Vanity as i figured i could just re DL it, but now i cannot seem to find the link...
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
wouldn't mind being able to set how aggressive it works... (like the intensity setting on the miners)

I have a GPU with a dead fan on it I would like to have vanitygen run on, but no apparent way to fine tune how fast it sends work to the card, to keep the temp reasonable.

=squeak=
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 11
I saw your screenshot.
There is no configure for vanitygen, but you do have to run a
Code:
make vanitygen
command on a *ux system.
The assert displayed is related to a missing/not found OpenSSL library.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
I always getting this problem. Can you help me?
Screenshot => bit[.]ly/1qQPFEN
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
I've been using oclvanityminer recently, and I've noticed that it uses 100% CPU and GPU. Shouldn't it use GPU only? Is there a way to disable CPU usage?
I've never had it use 100% CPU - it hovers around 30% - but that might depend on the hardware.  One thing you could check is what options it's using when compiling your OpenCL kernel.  Delete/rename the .oclbin file, and start up oclvanitygen(64) with the -v flag (verbose) to check.  Some output here:
Code:
Grid size: 4096x2048
Modular inverse: 2048 threads, 4096 ops each
Using OpenCL prefix matcher

If yours says it's using a CPU prefix matcher - that would probably be a good chunk of the CPU use.  Again though, mine's using the graphics card itself and still uses ~30% of the CPU.  Can't say I've looked at the code to see where that load's coming from - but at least there's nothing in terms of the command line flags to affect it one way or the other - and slowing the CPU portion down (through e.g. BES) does affect overall key generation rate.

It also says Using OpenCL prefix matcher... Still consuming 100% CPU and GPU

Try making it work on one core only (RMB on the process and click on "Set affinity" if you're a Windows user, or use taskset if you're on a Debian-based system).

You could also try different driver and AMD SDK versions as not all are affected by the 100% CPU bug, but some combinations can make oclvanitygen stop working so do that only if you have time to play with this.

It now consumes 50%... (100% of the resources that are given to the process)


Thanks for the tips. Maybe I'll update my drivers and see where it goes from there Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
any luck on this working with Catalyst 14 and a 5xxx?

=squeak=
Pages:
Jump to: