Pages:
Author

Topic: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD - page 92. (Read 251040 times)

sr. member
Activity: 288
Merit: 250
July 25, 2017, 07:20:44 PM
hello veritaseum community.

Quote
Emin Gün @el33th4xor

 Veritaseum just went from traditional ICO scam to theft. I guess that's a fitting end to a project that would never be able to deliver.

https://twitter.com/el33th4xor/status/889575940702994434

Whats your opinion?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
July 25, 2017, 07:17:52 PM
He did not. Token holders have no voting rights and will not receive any profits. Token holders have rights to software.
Microsoft is not selling me equity when I buy their Windows operating system.

But Microsoft is selling you a useful product.

Reggie is not.

Even if it is useless and I'm not saying it is, it is not illegal nor is there regulation for the sale of products that you consider to be useless.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
July 25, 2017, 07:15:20 PM
He did not. Token holders have no voting rights and will not receive any profits. Token holders have rights to software.
Microsoft is not selling me equity when I buy their Windows operating system.

But Microsoft is selling you a useful product.

Reggie is not.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
July 25, 2017, 07:12:05 PM

Good thing Reggie didn't do this then isn't it?

The specific definition of "worthless" in this case is "unbacked". i.e. the capital contributed by investors to purchase tokens goes to back the shares of the company that issued them, not the tokens themselves.

Contrary to your assertion, "Reggie" did in fact deploy this capitalisation model.
He did not. Token holders have no voting rights and will not receive any profits. Token holders have rights to software.
Microsoft is not selling me equity when I buy their Windows operating system.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
July 25, 2017, 07:09:16 PM

Good thing Reggie didn't do this then isn't it?

The specific definition of "worthless" in this case is "unbacked". i.e. the capital contributed by investors to purchase tokens goes to back the shares of the company that issued them, not the tokens themselves.

Contrary to your assertion, "Reggie" did in fact deploy this capitalisation model.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
July 25, 2017, 06:53:08 PM
In other words, they think the practice of conjuring up an arbitrary number of worthless tokens and using them to capitalise a corporate entity while retaining 100% of the equity in that entity, may be slightly "dodgy".

See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20324350.

Good thing Reggie didn't do this then isn't it?
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
July 25, 2017, 06:51:35 PM

Why have regulators become interested ?

Because it isn't about the tokens. It's about the companies that issue them. The tokens are worthless. But the issuers are immediately high value corporate assets. How ?

Because, normally when someone invests in your company you have to give them a share in the equity of that company. Token ICOs are a way to circumvent that protocol whereby, the issuer can capitalise a corporate entity while retaining 100% equity.

Also, the argument that tokens are somehow "not a security" is put to bed here by Simon Dixon. He's talking here about Ethereum itself, 6 months ago, but the principle applies even more specifically to ICO meta token issuances by known corporate entities for specific market sectors.


legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
July 25, 2017, 05:35:43 PM

Reggie can you comment on new SEC report and how does it affect, if at all, VERI token?

No need for Reggie to comment. It's there in black & white.



Furthermore...



In other words, they think the practice of conjuring up an arbitrary number of worthless tokens and using them to capitalise a corporate entity while retaining 100% of the equity in that entity, may be slightly "dodgy".

See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20324350.
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
July 25, 2017, 05:33:28 PM
Reggie can you comment on new SEC report and how does it affect, if at all, VERI token?
The SEC does not regulate software.


Not yet, but they're planning to...

https://www.coindesk.com/securities-exchange-commission-us-securities-laws-may-apply-token-sales/
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
July 25, 2017, 05:27:20 PM
$157.79 (-21.15%)
0.06221930 BTC (-14.30%)
0.79059400 ETH (-11.32%)
Veritaseum token is too cheap, i think it's the best time to bought some Wink
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
July 25, 2017, 05:24:01 PM
Reggie can you comment on new SEC report and how does it affect, if at all, VERI token?
The SEC does not regulate software.
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
July 25, 2017, 05:21:22 PM

Reggie can you comment on new SEC report and how does it affect, if at all, VERI token?



sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
July 25, 2017, 04:37:36 PM
I think etherdelta is quite complicated to use. Are there any other exchanges planned in the future?
VERI plans to be on all exchanges that will accept it.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
July 25, 2017, 04:13:30 PM
I think etherdelta is quite complicated to use. Are there any other exchanges planned in the future?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
July 25, 2017, 04:12:22 PM
Once again Dex the the Algo capitalist keeping it real in the Trading Terrordome!

https://youtu.be/Ch13quf2UsE

Gracias!
Lays it all out with epic simplicity @ 11:00+
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
July 25, 2017, 03:48:01 PM
Once again Dex the the Algo capitalist keeping it real in the Trading Terrordome!

https://youtu.be/Ch13quf2UsE

Yeah I like him.  Traded for a year with him, I trust his assessment
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
July 25, 2017, 03:39:27 PM
Once again Dex the the Algo capitalist keeping it real in the Trading Terrordome!

https://youtu.be/Ch13quf2UsE
sr. member
Activity: 492
Merit: 251
July 25, 2017, 02:52:02 PM
almost 100 pages  Cheesy

Yup, we're getting there (for better or worse)! Wink

These minor corrections are so great so we can make an entry ..really good!

A lot of talk about VERITASEUM on twitter as well, as well as mentioning it.. VERITASEUM will shine
99% is about the hack.
newbie
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
July 25, 2017, 01:56:02 PM
almost 100 pages  Cheesy

Yup, we're getting there (for better or worse)! Wink

These minor corrections are so great so we can make an entry ..really good!

A lot of talk about VERITASEUM on twitter as well, as well as mentioning it.. VERITASEUM will shine
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
July 25, 2017, 01:37:44 PM
>He is not . . .
>He is  . . .
>He will be  . . .
>he has . . .
>(He) is coming for you . . .
>Half the people who ever . . .

Striking mental effigy!
Are you fully conjugated b/c I'm missing at least the past participle?
Thanks for your help! Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: