Topic: VERITASEUM DISCUSSION THREAD - page 93. (Read 251011 times)
It should be rephrased: “First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, they you ignore them, then they fight you, and then you beat the living daylight out of them!”
I love the ignore button. I am trying to be a better man by not feeding it (too much).
almost 100 pages 
Yup, we're getting there (for better or worse)!
Firstly, it is a token, not a coin or cryptocurrency. Secondly, 100% of the circulating supply is available for trade at the right price. Big players also have the ability to buy VERI OTC from Veritaseum at a premium (the last time I checked: the market price + 10%). The market will determine the price (not low life losers who steal and try to crash the price). Thirdly, there are many tokens with a circulating supply of 2,000,000 and less that have been listed by Bittrex, Polo and other larger exchanges. Fourthly, pointing out an injustice is not a "Victimize-me" view, especially when it is backed by a fighting spirit based on a solution. Why do you think Dorky posted "whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them"? It is because Veritaseum and centralized exchanges such as EtherDelta don't need the likes of Bittrex in order to play ball. It would have been nice to get listed just like the others got listed, but it is certainly not the end of the world. Crying foul on the back of BS ("no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%") is much closer to a "Victimize-me" view!
Oh boy, why did I know that it would be mister paulmaritz again with his endless "it is a token not a cryptocurrency" which he repeats from Reggie's mouth without even understanding what it means. The fact that you state that there are other tokens with 2,000,000 supply shows that you have not the slightest idea what to compare here. Reggie holds 198,000,000 tokens in his wallet plus a percentage of the 2,000,000 tokens sold at the ICO that nobody knows.
Discussion finished, nobody who has a business to run trading tokens licks Reggie's shoes like you do - they just go by metrics. Only because you trust Reggie that he doesnt use those 198,000,000 tokens to sell 50 million and disappear doesnt mean the exchanges do the same. And I am happy they are not like you.
Now go and do what you always do as soon as someone makes you feel bad: Press the ignore button -- which unfortunately you cannot do in real life, that's why I guess you enjoy doing it here so much.
He is not a shoe licker. He is Reggie's ball licker. He will be there to defend Reggie like a rabid dog because he has invested his life savings in this scam coin. Oh yes, don't worry, the good old ignore button treatment is coming for you as well. Half the people who ever commented on this thread is on his ignore list.
“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win” - Mahatma Gandhi
almost 100 pages
Yup, we're getting there (for better or worse)!
Firstly, it is a token, not a coin or cryptocurrency. Secondly, 100% of the circulating supply is available for trade at the right price. Big players also have the ability to buy VERI OTC from Veritaseum at a premium (the last time I checked: the market price + 10%). The market will determine the price (not low life losers who steal and try to crash the price). Thirdly, there are many tokens with a circulating supply of 2,000,000 and less that have been listed by Bittrex, Polo and other larger exchanges. Fourthly, pointing out an injustice is not a "Victimize-me" view, especially when it is backed by a fighting spirit based on a solution. Why do you think Dorky posted "whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them"? It is because Veritaseum and centralized exchanges such as EtherDelta don't need the likes of Bittrex in order to play ball. It would have been nice to get listed just like the others got listed, but it is certainly not the end of the world. Crying foul on the back of BS ("no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%") is much closer to a "Victimize-me" view!
Oh boy, why did I know that it would be mister paulmaritz again with his endless "it is a token not a cryptocurrency" which he repeats from Reggie's mouth without even understanding what it means. The fact that you state that there are other tokens with 2,000,000 supply shows that you have not the slightest idea what to compare here. Reggie holds 198,000,000 tokens in his wallet plus a percentage of the 2,000,000 tokens sold at the ICO that nobody knows.
Discussion finished, nobody who has a business to run trading tokens licks Reggie's shoes like you do - they just go by metrics. Only because you trust Reggie that he doesnt use those 198,000,000 tokens to sell 50 million and disappear doesnt mean the exchanges do the same. And I am happy they are not like you.
Now go and do what you always do as soon as someone makes you feel bad: Press the ignore button -- which unfortunately you cannot do in real life, that's why I guess you enjoy doing it here so much.
In addition, you're mistaken, when I am fed up of entertaining your BS, I will hit the ignore button, just as I choose to hit the "ignore button" offline. This is real life for me, both online and offline. I simply don't know from which planet you come when you state "which unfortunately you cannot do in real life," but I can tell you, things work differently here on planet Earth. In addition, I am glad you can sense the loyalty I have towards Reggie, the Veritaseum team in general and all the VERI supporters out there. I will never willingly side with cockroaches and worms with no balls. No go crawl back into your hole!
almost 100 pages
Firstly, it is a token, not a coin or cryptocurrency. Secondly, 100% of the circulating supply is available for trade at the right price. Big players also have the ability to buy VERI OTC from Veritaseum at a premium (the last time I checked: the market price + 10%). The market will determine the price (not low life losers who steal and try to crash the price). Thirdly, there are many tokens with a circulating supply of 2,000,000 and less that have been listed by Bittrex, Polo and other larger exchanges. Fourthly, pointing out an injustice is not a "Victimize-me" view, especially when it is backed by a fighting spirit based on a solution. Why do you think Dorky posted "whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them"? It is because Veritaseum and centralized exchanges such as EtherDelta don't need the likes of Bittrex in order to play ball. It would have been nice to get listed just like the others got listed, but it is certainly not the end of the world. Crying foul on the back of BS ("no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%") is much closer to a "Victimize-me" view!
Oh boy, why did I know that it would be mister paulmaritz again with his endless "it is a token not a cryptocurrency" which he repeats from Reggie's mouth without even understanding what it means. The fact that you state that there are other tokens with 2,000,000 supply shows that you have not the slightest idea what to compare here. Reggie holds 198,000,000 tokens in his wallet plus a percentage of the 2,000,000 tokens sold at the ICO that nobody knows.
Discussion finished, nobody who has a business to run trading tokens licks Reggie's shoes like you do - they just go by metrics. Only because you trust Reggie that he doesnt use those 198,000,000 tokens to sell 50 million and disappear doesnt mean the exchanges do the same. And I am happy they are not like you.
Now go and do what you always do as soon as someone makes you feel bad: Press the ignore button -- which unfortunately you cannot do in real life, that's why I guess you enjoy doing it here so much.
A 198,000 million tokens? You should go whine somewhere else if you cannot even get the facts straight!
"The ICO was held over the weekend, and that’s when all hell broke loose": https://hothardware.com/news/ethereum-veritaseum-ico-hack-84-million-theft
Blatantly false news designed to stir the proverbial.
Blatantly false news designed to stir the proverbial.
That's the "Victimize-me" view, truth is rather, that no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%. Period. Accept it.
Because Reggie (and his team) could play the price up to 20 trillions or down to 10 USD without even paying anything for it.
So you can end this exchange discussion.
The exchanges could give a crap. They make money when the coins/tokens change hands. Volume is all they should care about. Because Reggie (and his team) could play the price up to 20 trillions or down to 10 USD without even paying anything for it.
So you can end this exchange discussion.
Firstly, it is a token, not a coin or cryptocurrency. Secondly, 100% of the circulating supply is available for trade at the right price. Big players also have the ability to buy VERI OTC from Veritaseum at a premium (the last time I checked: the market price + 10%). The market will determine the price (not low life losers who steal and try to crash the price). Thirdly, there are many tokens with a circulating supply of 2,000,000 and less that have been listed by Bittrex, Polo and other larger exchanges. Fourthly, pointing out an injustice is not a "Victimize-me" view, especially when it is backed by a fighting spirit based on a solution. Why do you think Dorky posted "whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them"? It is because Veritaseum and centralized exchanges such as EtherDelta don't need the likes of Bittrex in order to play ball. It would have been nice to get listed just like the others got listed, but it is certainly not the end of the world. Crying foul on the back of BS ("no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%") is much closer to a "Victimize-me" view!
Oh boy, why did I know that it would be mister paulmaritz again with his endless "it is a token not a cryptocurrency" which he repeats from Reggie's mouth without even understanding what it means. The fact that you state that there are other tokens with 2,000,000 supply shows that you have not the slightest idea what to compare here. Reggie holds 198,000,000 tokens in his wallet plus a percentage of the 2,000,000 tokens sold at the ICO that nobody knows.
Discussion finished, nobody who has a business to run trading tokens licks Reggie's shoes like you do - they just go by metrics. Only because you trust Reggie that he doesnt use those 198,000,000 tokens to sell 50 million and disappear doesnt mean the exchanges do the same. And I am happy they are not like you.
Now go and do what you always do as soon as someone makes you feel bad: Press the ignore button -- which unfortunately you cannot do in real life, that's why I guess you enjoy doing it here so much.
If they are not listing Veritas out of discrimination, whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them.
We don't need Bittrex. Let them go fish.
Edit:
By the way, if I were in charge, I would sue that corporate partner for 100% of the damages inclusive of having them recover 100% of all the tokens stolen (they can do it by acquiring them in the open market, if they incur higher costs doing so it's their problem), return all the tokens back, and I will put the tokens back into the reserve. And I will make sure to have this legal action made public so everyone can see who the scum is.
We don't need Bittrex. Let them go fish.
Edit:
By the way, if I were in charge, I would sue that corporate partner for 100% of the damages inclusive of having them recover 100% of all the tokens stolen (they can do it by acquiring them in the open market, if they incur higher costs doing so it's their problem), return all the tokens back, and I will put the tokens back into the reserve. And I will make sure to have this legal action made public so everyone can see who the scum is.
That's the "Victimize-me" view, truth is rather, that no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%. Period. Accept it.
Because Reggie (and his team) could play the price up to 20 trillions or down to 10 USD without even paying anything for it.
So you can end this exchange discussion.
Firstly, it is a token, not a coin or cryptocurrency. Secondly, 100% of the circulating supply is available for trade at the right price. Big players also have the ability to buy VERI OTC from Veritaseum at a premium (the last time I checked: the market price + 10%). The market will determine the price (not low life losers who steal and try to crash the price). Thirdly, there are many tokens with a circulating supply of 2,000,000 and less that have been listed by Bittrex, Polo and other larger exchanges. Fourthly, pointing out an injustice is not a "Victimize-me" view, especially when it is backed by a fighting spirit based on a solution. Why do you think Dorky posted "whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them"? It is because Veritaseum and centralized exchanges such as EtherDelta don't need the likes of Bittrex in order to play ball. It would have been nice to get listed just like the others got listed, but it is certainly not the end of the world. Crying foul on the back of BS ("no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%") is much closer to a "Victimize-me" view!
If they are not listing Veritas out of discrimination, whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them.
We don't need Bittrex. Let them go fish.
Edit:
By the way, if I were in charge, I would sue that corporate partner for 100% of the damages inclusive of having them recover 100% of all the tokens stolen (they can do it by acquiring them in the open market, if they incur higher costs doing so it's their problem), return all the tokens back, and I will put the tokens back into the reserve. And I will make sure to have this legal action made public so everyone can see who the scum is.
We don't need Bittrex. Let them go fish.
Edit:
By the way, if I were in charge, I would sue that corporate partner for 100% of the damages inclusive of having them recover 100% of all the tokens stolen (they can do it by acquiring them in the open market, if they incur higher costs doing so it's their problem), return all the tokens back, and I will put the tokens back into the reserve. And I will make sure to have this legal action made public so everyone can see who the scum is.
That's the "Victimize-me" view, truth is rather, that no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%. Period. Accept it.
Because Reggie (and his team) could play the price up to 20 trillions or down to 10 USD without even paying anything for it.
So you can end this exchange discussion.
And fuck that Bittrex already.
Clearly Veritaseum doesn't need this particular exchange to prosper.
Edit:
Nobody fucking need Bittrex to buy VERI, so please stop focusing on Bittrex already.
To be fair, Bittrex hasn't added anyone other recent ICOs lately that I'm aware of other than PAY. Neither has Polo. Give them a chance, they will.Clearly Veritaseum doesn't need this particular exchange to prosper.
Edit:
Nobody fucking need Bittrex to buy VERI, so please stop focusing on Bittrex already.
I'm guessing they are overwhelmed with business. Saw an article that Coinbase added 100k users in 3 days.
I m afraid that simply isn't true,
They have added Mona.co, Status, OMG, Pay/tenx, 1st blood, patientory, humaniq, trust, adex, ect ect ect...
those aren't old by any standard
Why not get Dr Pippa Malmgren introduced to Veritasium ?
She seems to:
• understand blockchain assets and their implications for distruption
• have a strong background in global finance
• have a strong presence in advising institutional investors
To be fair, Bittrex hasn't added anyone other recent ICOs lately that I'm aware of other than PAY. Neither has Polo. Give them a chance, they will.
I'm guessing they are overwhelmed with business. Saw an article that Coinbase added 100k users in 3 days.
I'm guessing they are overwhelmed with business. Saw an article that Coinbase added 100k users in 3 days.
If they are not listing Veritas out of discrimination, whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them.
We don't need Bittrex. Let them go fish.
Edit:
By the way, if I were in charge, I would sue that corporate partner for 100% of the damages inclusive of having them recover 100% of all the tokens stolen (they can do it by acquiring them in the open market, if they incur higher costs doing so it's their problem), return all the tokens back, and I will put the tokens back into the reserve. And I will make sure to have this legal action made public so everyone can see who the scum is.
dude half these websites couldn't find a fact if it was lodged between the ONLY 2 functioning brain cells...some of them don't even describe the simple mechanisms of this industry with any precision...it's almost like they have no idea about anything crypto related
That's what I thought. You never realize just how bad/inaccurate the press is until you have an article written about you.
And fuck that Bittrex already.
Clearly Veritaseum doesn't need this particular exchange to prosper.
Edit:
Nobody fucking need Bittrex to buy VERI, so please stop focusing on Bittrex already.
To be fair, Bittrex hasn't added anyone other recent ICOs lately that I'm aware of other than PAY. Neither has Polo. Give them a chance, they will.Clearly Veritaseum doesn't need this particular exchange to prosper.
Edit:
Nobody fucking need Bittrex to buy VERI, so please stop focusing on Bittrex already.
I'm guessing they are overwhelmed with business. Saw an article that Coinbase added 100k users in 3 days.
What ICO was this?
They must've meant the Advance Private Pre-ICO Select Pre-Sale of the LDT: Language Destruction Token. Centralised POS for legacy media corps. Jump to: