Topic: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position - page 32. (Read 55283 times)

First of all the MSDN keys have nothing to do with me other than the fact I spoke in related threads. How he handled that situation has nothing to do with his negative rating for me, where he also abused his position in the default trust list. However, in the course of me discussing the MSDN key situation, he did not like the fact that I was critical of him so he suddenly declared in the middle of a related thread he was giving me a negative. He didn't neg rate me for "lying" about some long past event which he can't even seem to name, he clearly did it to use his authority to retaliate for calling out his abusive behavior.


I DID already drop this subject once, after he changed his negative rating to a neutral previously. Clearly he did not "learn his lesson" the first time when he was given a "second" chance, because here we are AGAIN:




And don't forget the other people he did this too, documented earlier in this thread alone:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10058903
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10069566


Technically this would be his 4th or 5th chance at least, yet he still keeps exhibiting the same behavior, and people like you still make excuses for him.

TECSHARE, I agree with you to some extent. It seemed like Vod abused his advantage of being in the trust list.

But after all this backlash that he received he gave a very clear chance to people dealing MSDN keys. He removed his negative trust rating from people that stopped selling those keys and didn't bother more with those that didn't.
 
I'd suggest giving this topic some rest. Vod probably learned his lesson. It's just tomatocage that keeps him in level 2 default trust now after this incident. If Vod causes another uproar within this forum it's very likely that he'll eventually lose his position in the default trust list.

I think marco is right...time to end
the thread...you made your point. 

Tell me please, what do those other threads about Vod have to do with me? I didn't start them, why are they my responsibility? Why is it because a lot of other people make threads accusing him some how my complaint has less value? That doesn't sound at all like you are reviewing the facts but simply letting your confirmation bias take its course. Don't you think the continual stack of complaints against Vod might be a symptom of his behavior instead of just being a petty nuisance for you to read so many thread titles with his name in it?

Vod clearly abused his position on the default trust to silence me from speaking out about his abuse. He can't even explain his rating without contradicting himself. Him abusing my reputation costs you nothing, so frankly your opinion is meaningless to me because in reality it doesn't effect you to just pretend he isn't abusing his position on the default trust list. I have a right to bring his abuse to public light regardless of your opinions on the matter. If you don't like all the threads about Vod, perhaps Vod's behavior has something to do with it and you should address him.


It is quite convenient that Vod declares the debate over right as I prove his claims have no substance by demonstrating the inconsistencies in his own statements. You still have not responded as to why this is a lie about you. You have not provided even a single justification for your rating for me that you conveniently decided to make a negative in the middle of a discussion about your abusive behavior that I was a party to. Of course it is because I "lied" about you, not because you are annoyed that I am exposing your abusive actions and you want me to stop talking about it.

/thread. Now lock the topic and move on with your life guys.

Come on guys, Vod willl be never removed from the default trust (level 2 -depth). In these days I have seen the Meta section full of topics about "Vod", can you stopl please? Thanks.

Oh I see, so your story has changed now. Amazing how that works after I demonstrate your inconsistencies. I don't need dozens of examples, I need one comment that you can verify as a lie (not that that is an excuse for neg rating me but the fact that you can't provide this demonstrates your disingenuous reasons for leaving the rating).

Please tell me how this is a lie about you, and how you can demonstrate it is false, otherwise you are just trying to fluff up your personal revenge with empty window dressing.

Proof Vod changed the rating to a negative as a direct result of my criticism of his behavior when mass negging key sellers in a related thread. Some one takes notice of his neutral rating for me, suddenly he feels it should be changed back to negative as he is enraged because I dare to challenge him:


He is using the trust system to attempt to silence anyone critical of his actions.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9454243
November 06, 2014, 01:56:46 AM

Like I posted, there are dozens of examples, some that precede my leaving you negative trust (obviously).  I just don't care to search for them all - you may feel free to.

This debate has run it's course and is over.  

You referenced a post from this thread as your reference for why you posted your trust rating for me, but your original trust rating was posted BEFORE THIS THREAD, otherwise why would I open a topic abut your negative rating if you had not made it yet? Just because you deleted it and reposted it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Can you tell me why the negative rating was left BEFORE I stated this so called lie about you? If you weren't referencing something in the future what exactly were you referencing. Funny how your explanation just gets tagged on later as you make it up as you go along to justify your abuse of the trust system.

 I am curious how exactly this thread itself is justification for the negative trust rating you left for me when the entire purpose of this thread is to point out your negative rating for me and how it is abusive. This is clearly nonsensical and circular logic.

Your original negative rating for me:


Your reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10060458

We'll never see eye to eye.  You'll keep twisting my words and lying about me no matter what I post or do.

I've proven my negative feedback is legit and not based on personal feelings.  I'm doing everyone a favor and putting this to rest.  You may continue. 

You are still on the default trust list even after exhibiting repeated abusive behavior...

You do not agree with my opinion, that does not make it a lie, even if it was a lie, that is not a legitimate use of a negative rating from some one on the default trust. You even admitted it here yourself when you changed it from a negative to a neutral the FIRST time you did this.

Well lie or not, I still don't think there is any connection.

Not a lie?  I'm actually protected by the staff?     

Because it is not a lie, Vod is just looking for any of the flimsiest of pretexts to have an excuse for using his position on the default trust to settle his little petty personal annoyances.

I don't see the connection between TECSHARE supposedly lying about Vod being protected by the staff regarding his status on the default trust list and scamming. I don't even see the connection between TECSHARE supposedly lying about Vod being protected by the staff regarding his status on the default trust list and getting Vod removed from the default trust network.

Your constant lying (continuing even to this day) makes you untrustworthy.  Doesn't make you a scammer - it's not called the SCAMMER LIST.

Ok, you go ahead and do that. Dozens, that's funny, yet you resisted so hard to provide even a single example. I wonder why.

Since when is "lying" a justified use of the trust system from someone on the position of the default trust list? How exactly does this make me a scammer even if your almost nonexistent pretenses were true?

Found one on the 8th page of this thread.  There are dozens floating around.


Tecshare, Badbear removed me from his trust list.  I do not have a protected position on default trust.  Stop lying about me.

I'll go add the reference to the trust now and put this to rest. 

I am still waiting for you to provide ANY substance to your rating Vod. Your constant excuses and diversions when asked for a reference are quite transparent. You can not do it because you know very well you left it as a form of retribution, not because I did anything scammy.


Ok, what lie did I make about you? Please tell me exactly what is untrue about that statement? You are still on the default trust list, one person removing you does not change that.

Holy shit can we please stop with the he said she said bullshit. When you make a thread or post provide evidence to back up your claims or else stop arguing. It's getting really old and annoying.