Pages:
Author

Topic: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position - page 34. (Read 55281 times)

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Just to be fair, you guys should also point out when people add me to their trust list.

My unbiased trust list (only DefaultTrust) has me up by 2 points since I left the negatives on the MSDN seller's accounts.

Overall, I do good for this forum, and people recognize that.    Smiley
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Yes HostFat removed Vod from his trust list :


He actually excluded him from his trust list. However in order for him to be excluded from the default trust network an additional person on level one default trust would need to exclude him. Even if he is excluded though his ratings would still show up for a lot of people because so many people have tomatocage on their trust list.

I am not sure if Vod should be removed though. I do think he shouldn't apply such a liberal use of the negative trust button though.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Yes HostFat removed Vod from his trust list :

newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
On a sidenote, HostFat removed Vod from his trust list. Now it's just Tomatocage that keeps him in. Hopefully that's the last time tat he abuses people. I assume that he wasnt to keep hi position in the list.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I have been thinking about Vod as follows: He has abused his powers for everyone and he applies only negative feedback for those who are competing business with him or he was being paid by the seller to reduce the credibility of me

yes, I agree with you. he has slandered a lot of people for the sake of his own

You're both wrong.   Wink  I don't have a competing business selling MSDN codes and I haven't been paid anything. 

In any case, I feel this debate has resolved itself.  Have a good day. 
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I have been thinking about Vod as follows: He has abused his powers for everyone and he applies only negative feedback for those who are competing business with him or he was being paid by the seller to reduce the credibility of me

yes, I agree with you. he has slandered a lot of people for the sake of his own
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Skype: jsweeney13
I have been thinking about Vod as follows: He has abused his powers for everyone and he applies only negative feedback for those who are competing business with him or he was being paid by the seller to reduce the credibility of me
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

I can't say anything about your situation, only my personal opinion:

The trust system in these last month was ruined by a lot of members and I hope that in the new forum software it will be a new trust system. The feedback should be sent only if there is a valid reference and proofs.

I will remove Vod from my trust list, because I don't trust his feedback (negative, positive or neutral) and you should do the same. Build your trust list, who cares?

I agree, the trust system is very poorly managed and has become a complete mess.

Exactly. What makes it worse is that there seems to be a few members who are able to say what they want, neg rep who they want & abuse who they want without any repercussion from admins, as your sig points out.

This forum has its goods and bads.

Although some people do actually bust scams, but they misuse their powers. People don't express their feelings openly because they are afraid of the negative trust.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
Welcome to dogietalk.bs

I can't say anything about your situation, only my personal opinion:

The trust system in these last month was ruined by a lot of members and I hope that in the new forum software it will be a new trust system. The feedback should be sent only if there is a valid reference and proofs.

I will remove Vod from my trust list, because I don't trust his feedback (negative, positive or neutral) and you should do the same. Build your trust list, who cares?

I agree, the trust system is very poorly managed and has become a complete mess.

Exactly. What makes it worse is that there seems to be a few members who are able to say what they want, neg rep who they want & abuse who they want without any repercussion from admins, as your sig points out.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever

I can't say anything about your situation, only my personal opinion:

The trust system in these last month was ruined by a lot of members and I hope that in the new forum software it will be a new trust system. The feedback should be sent only if there is a valid reference and proofs.

I will remove Vod from my trust list, because I don't trust his feedback (negative, positive or neutral) and you should do the same. Build your trust list, who cares?

I agree, the trust system is very poorly managed and has become a complete mess. I am not holding my breath for new forum software, it has been a couple years already since that was promised. I appreciate you taking action on your own trust list, and thank you for reviewing this situation critically and without bias. I have already edited my trust list accordingly. People care because, as traders, what our trust rating appears like to users on the default trust list has direct and massive effects on our ability to trade. Additionally I worked my ass off over 3 years to build an impeccable trading reputation here, back when Bitcoin was still nothing but a joke and everything was always an uphill battle, just to have some out of control, self proclaimed scambuster crap all over it because he doesn't like that I point out his abusive behavior. I just don't find this acceptable by any standards.

This forum is so chocked full of paranoia, users will often walk away at any negative rating without even reviewing it, just looking at the red and green numbers, then trade with some one else. It seems superficial, but traders examination of their prospective trading partners are unfortunately often very superficial if not uninformed. VOD occupies a position of authority in the default trust system, which he regularly abuses, and that harms all of us. He needs to be removed from the default trust.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
He hasn't been active on the forums yet for even a month and he is back at it again trying to silence people from discussing his abusive behavior by using his position on the default trust. He has taken the originally negative rating which he left me before, which he then changed to a neutral after public pressure in order to keep himself on the default trust, and now he has replaced it as a negative yet again.

Some how in VODs mind repeated default trust abuse is ok, as long as you change your rating to neutral for a while until everyone forgets, then you can go back to abusing your position to attempt to settle personal vendettas. How many times is VOD going to be allowed to do this before he is removed from the default trust list?

Vod 2015-03-22       0.00000000      
"Constantly posts lies about me in an effort to have me removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis. Not trustworthy. "

Notice there is no reference, and when asked what supposed lie of mine he is referencing, he can't produce it.

I can't say anything about your situation, only my personal opinion:

The trust system in these last month was ruined by a lot of members and I hope that in the new forum software it will be a new trust system. The feedback should be sent only if there is a valid reference and proofs.

I will remove Vod from my trust list, because I don't trust his feedback (negative, positive or neutral) and you should do the same. Build your trust list, who cares?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
He hasn't been active on the forums yet for even a month and he is back at it again trying to silence people from discussing his abusive behavior by using his position on the default trust. He has taken the originally negative rating which he left me before, which he then changed to a neutral after public pressure in order to keep himself on the default trust, and now he has replaced it as a negative yet again.

Some how in VODs mind repeated default trust abuse is ok, as long as you change your rating to neutral for a while until everyone forgets, then you can go back to abusing your position to attempt to settle personal vendettas. How many times is VOD going to be allowed to do this before he is removed from the default trust list?

Vod 2015-03-22       0.00000000      
"Constantly posts lies about me in an effort to have me removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis. Not trustworthy. "

Notice there is no reference, and when asked what supposed lie of mine he is referencing, he can't produce it.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever


My point is that Tecshare has questionable judgement and
so whatever he says about Vod you have to take with a grain of salt.


Then why is it you didn't say this in your first post? IMO you are just trying to cover for your failed attempt at slander by off topic posing in any thready you can find in my post history.

1. Pretty much I did say that.

2. Slander is spoken, you mean libel.

3. It is not libel if it is the truth.
 


You have no proof, therefor it is libel. Locking this thread now since you don't seem to understand the meaning of off topic (apparently when I am making the report neither does staff).
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


My point is that Tecshare has questionable judgement and
so whatever he says about Vod you have to take with a grain of salt.


Then why is it you didn't say this in your first post? IMO you are just trying to cover for your failed attempt at slander by off topic posing in any thready you can find in my post history.

1. Pretty much I did say that.

2. Slander is spoken, you mean libel.

3. It is not libel if it is the truth.
 
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever


Tell me... what hard evidence EXACTLY am I ignoring? Because so far I have seen no evidence presented, only theories and accusations.
 

Woodcollector asserted he would make a video proving his
skills at hand carving...  He clearly failed to do so.

His video only shows power tools, not hand carving,
and the starting block of wood is
pre-engraved in the video.

That's hard video evidence right there!


Actually no, that is just evidence he hasn't proved with video conclusively that he does his carving work by hand. That is not evidence that he does not hand carve. He has already stated he will post more videos as well. Try again.




I agree with Tecshare here. You're horribly off topic in this thread.  

My point is that Tecshare has questionable judgement and
so whatever he says about Vod you have to take with a grain of salt.


Then why is it you didn't say this in your first post? IMO you are just trying to cover for your failed attempt at slander by off topic posing in any thread you can find in my post history.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


I agree with Tecshare here. You're horribly off topic in this thread. 

My point is that Tecshare has questionable judgement and
so whatever he says about Vod you have to take with a grain of salt.
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint


Tell me... what hard evidence EXACTLY am I ignoring? Because so far I have seen no evidence presented, only theories and accusations.
 

Woodcollector asserted he would make a video proving his
skills at hand carving...  He clearly failed to do so.

His video only shows power tools, not hand carving,
and the starting block of wood is
pre-engraved in the video.

That's hard video evidence right there!


I agree with Tecshare here. You're horribly off topic in this thread. Why don't you post this in (one of the many) meta threads about Woodcollector? Let's not make *every* single thread about it.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


Tell me... what hard evidence EXACTLY am I ignoring? Because so far I have seen no evidence presented, only theories and accusations.
 

Woodcollector asserted he would make a video proving his
skills at hand carving...  He clearly failed to do so.

His video only shows power tools, not hand carving,
and the starting block of wood is
pre-engraved in the video.

That's hard video evidence right there!
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
I think it is pretty clear that  VOD is unrepentant, and is furthermore intent on spreading lies about myself, iCEBREAKER, and takagari simply for speaking up about his abusive behavior, even if they changed from the form of a negative rating, to a neutral rating (only after public pressure). Additionally he continues to maintain I actually lied about him, yet he can not provide one actual example of a deceiving statement I personally made. This demonstrates his continued intent to harass me for speaking up about his abuses in spite of him claiming to be repentant by changing the negative to a neutral. This also demonstrates this was his intent all along.

I think it is pretty clear TECSHARE is a liar.  Everyone can see it except for him - that's what happens when you lie all the time.   Undecided
Still waiting for you to post a single actual example of a lie you claim I made. I am sorry you are having trouble doing this, you know, seeing as it never happened.

even if they changed from the form of a negative rating, to a neutral rating (only after public pressure).
Isn't that the point of creating these kinds of thread in meta? When someone feels that they received unjust feedback that they cannot resolve themselves the community can voice their opinions about the feedback in question. If you think it is not appropriate for someone to remove feedback after opening a thread about it in meta then what was the point of opening this thread in the first place? To get back on default trust list?
All you little shills keep saying I want to get back on the trust list, not sure how many times I have to say I want to END the default trust.  Additionally you are confused. I made this thread not only to have VOD remove his negative trust ratings used to try to intimidate people from speaking out against him, but to draw attention to the fact that HE SHOULD NOT BE ON THE DEFAULT TRUST LIST. He has exhibited a clear pattern of abusive, harassing, and intimidating behavior not just against the general forum users, but especially against people who are critical of his behavior. This thread is proof that he abuses the default trust system to attempt to silence his detractors.

So because you can't be on the default trust list you think there shouldn't be one anymore?

lol sounds like that.

You do cry/whine much like Goat. Are you brothers? Roll Eyes
Pages:
Jump to: