Topic: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position - page 38. (Read 55281 times)
January 08, 2015, 05:48:13 AM
Bzzt. Insufficient funds.
January 08, 2015, 05:48:08 AM
How about you donate 1 BTC to the swear jar every time you make an ad hominem attack, or call random users shills or trools?
January 08, 2015, 05:47:26 AM
Transfer 100 bitcoins to Tomatocage to be sent to those you owe, before I answer you further.
Bzzt.(1) You have never directly answered any of my questions.
(2) Unreasonable demand and refusal to answer questions, in an attempt to avoid scrutiny.
Try again.
January 08, 2015, 05:46:31 AM
How about you return 100 bitcoin to the people you stole it from each time I answer one your questions?
I sure don't feel like chatting with such a large scammer for free.
Bzzt. Irrelevant ad hominem.I sure don't feel like chatting with such a large scammer for free.
Try again.
Transfer 100 bitcoins to Tomatocage to be sent to those you owe, before I answer you further.
January 08, 2015, 05:45:31 AM
How about you return 100 bitcoin to the people you stole it from each time I answer one your questions?
I sure don't feel like chatting with such a large scammer for free.
Bzzt. Irrelevant ad hominem.I sure don't feel like chatting with such a large scammer for free.
Try again.
January 08, 2015, 05:44:49 AM
Having to chat with you?
Irrelevant ad hominem.Try again.
How about you return 100 bitcoin to the people you stole it from each time I answer one your questions?
I sure don't feel like chatting with such a large scammer for free.
January 08, 2015, 05:44:40 AM
Please give me an answer, instead of avoiding this question with ad hominems.
That's all he can do
January 08, 2015, 05:44:03 AM
I can't give you an answer you will understand. Stop asking.
I'm sorry, but it's up to you to identify how I am abusing the trust system. Please give me an answer, instead of avoiding this question with ad hominems.Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:
January 08, 2015, 05:43:28 AM
Having to chat with you?
Irrelevant ad hominem.Try again.
January 08, 2015, 05:43:20 AM
I can't give you an answer you will understand.
I'm sorry, but it's up to you to identify how I am abusing the trust system. Please give me an answer, instead of avoiding this question with ad hominems.
Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:
I can't give you an answer you will understand. Stop asking.
January 08, 2015, 05:42:36 AM
I can't give you an answer you will understand.
I'm sorry, but it's up to you to identify how I am abusing the trust system. Please give me an answer, instead of avoiding this question with ad hominems.
Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:
January 08, 2015, 05:42:22 AM
You're dense. I've pointed out as clearly as I can how he lied.
What repercussions have you faced for abusing the trust system?I don't think you have faced any. So how is that a lie then?
Vod had to suffer the serious repercussions of
1. removing his unreasonable bad-faith false negative feedback about my "possibly hacked" account
and
2. sending me a PM saying "Sorry"
As you can see, the rules for Default Trust members are very strict if you are named TECSHARE, but meant to be broken if your name is Vod.
January 08, 2015, 05:42:16 AM
This conversation?
Scrutiny, defined as 'critical observation or examination', is not a repercussion.Try again.
Having to chat with you?
January 08, 2015, 05:41:44 AM
This conversation?
Scrutiny, defined as 'critical observation or examination', is not a repercussion.Try again.
January 08, 2015, 05:41:31 AM
Why bother trying? You can't understand.
I'm sorry, but it's up to you to identify how I am abusing the trust system. Please give me an answer, instead of avoiding this question.
Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:
I can't give you an answer you will understand.
January 08, 2015, 05:40:47 AM
Why bother trying? You can't understand.
I'm sorry, but it's up to you to identify how I am abusing the trust system. Please give me an answer, instead of avoiding this question.
Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:
January 08, 2015, 05:40:39 AM
It is your issue. Everyone else can understand me.
Please put your hand up if you can "understand" what identifiable repercussions Vod has faced over his trust system abuse.Anyone?
This conversation?
January 08, 2015, 05:40:00 AM
It is your issue. Everyone else can understand me.
Please put your hand up if you can "understand" what identifiable repercussions Vod has faced over his trust system abuse.Anyone?
January 08, 2015, 05:38:41 AM
I did. You can't understand it. That's your issue, not mine.
It is not my issue that you are unable to adequately explain your position.
It is up to you to identify what repercussions you have faced. You are the one making the claim.
It is your issue. Everyone else can understand me.
Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:
Why bother trying? You can't understand.
January 08, 2015, 05:38:25 AM
You've caused damage to my reputation by abusing the trust system. But since you're not on the default trust list, you feel you can do whatever you want, since I have higher responsibilities.
Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:Quote
This user abuses the trust system and his position in DefaultTrust by using negative feedback to punish people who criticize his hot-headed bursts of poor judgement.
See the reference link for more information.
See the reference link for more information.
Quote
This user has made a number of disparaging remarks about users, such as claiming that a user has lied, without backing it up or pointing to any instance of the 'lies'.
Consider his left trust feedback carefully.
Consider his left trust feedback carefully.
Are any of them inaccurate? How are they inaccurate? Even if inaccurate, how is it abuse of the trust system?
Jump to: