Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 26491. (Read 26608361 times)

legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Even if it is not true, that was so well written it was great fun to read Smiley

To da moon  Cool Cool Cool

I agree with you about the well written aspect.....  and I will add that I believe that the ODDs of this story being true is likely less than one in a thousand.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
well i got my fill for today.  Grin UP
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
So where are we going next guys?   Huh Huh Huh

God Bless ye' patient souls.

LOL, right? Where the hell did the last month of my life go? Once upon a time, bitcoin moved...
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
So where are we going next guys?   Huh Huh Huh

God Bless ye' patient souls.

Watching the charts we will almost surely continue going to the right.
legendary
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
So where are we going next guys?   Huh Huh Huh

God Bless ye' patient souls.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70

Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)

Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread.

Right?
I dont think I understand what you're saying.

1) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids. Bids refilled right near bid/ask spread (suggesting the bidder wants them filled)
2) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids again. Bids refilled again.
3) Ask walls placed 80-100 CNY above spread (suggesting the seller does not want them filled)

One side is very obviously accumulating. The other side may just be trying to manipulate price down. In fact, they may be one and the same party, if this bidder is serious about getting filled.

Ah, I thought you were saying the bids were just people trying to sell the coins for a 2% profit Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70

Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)

Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread.

Right?
I dont think I understand what you're saying.

1) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids. Bids refilled right near bid/ask spread (suggesting the bidder wants them filled)
2) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids again. Bids refilled again.
3) Ask walls placed 80-100 CNY above spread (suggesting the seller does not want them filled)

One side is very obviously accumulating. The other side may just be trying to manipulate price down. In fact, they may be one and the same party, if this bidder is serious about getting filled.

These could be dumps in their own walls to prove strength of the 3600 level. Then they set 3700 asks to limit short term growth and after some time upward hammer can follow when asks are either pulled or again bought by the owner.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70

Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)

Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread.

Right?
I dont think I understand what you're saying.

1) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids. Bids refilled right near bid/ask spread (suggesting the bidder wants them filled)
2) Sellers dumped through 3600 bids again. Bids refilled again.
3) Ask walls placed 80-100 CNY above spread (suggesting the seller does not want them filled)

One side is very obviously accumulating. The other side may just be trying to manipulate price down. In fact, they may be one and the same party, if this bidder is serious about getting filled.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1008
Delusional crypto obsessionist
All my trades since February 2013 are based on the same model.
So yes, I believe the same outcome, not necessarily this post at reddit.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70

Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)

Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread.

Right?
I dont think I understand what you're saying.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70

Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)

Exactly. There's a big difference between having your bids dumped into and refilling them twice near spread, and setting asks $10 above spread.

Right?
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
I agree it can go either way, but those 5k bids are all on $2.60 of spread.. the 5k of asks are across $9.70

Plus there is an 8k bidwall on 3450-3400 (no idea what is beyond 3700)
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
On both sides, though. We will have to wait and see which side wins. In my opinion it's quite balanced as of now. The buying or selling pressure will have to decide about the eventual outcome.

Notable, though -- 3600 level was dumped twice and bid support refilled lightning quick both times -- right at spread, not below.

The ask walls were placed 80-100 CNY above spread -- where no one could buy them. And every time someone places a 500+ ask wall at spread it is instantly eaten. I suspect the walls near 3700 are fake -- certainly there is much higher chance of that than the 3600 walls being fake.

I wouldn't be surprised if the 3700 walls were placed by the accumulator, to try to force sellers into his bids.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Trust me!
Impressive depth on Huobi





On both sides, though. We will have to wait and see which side wins. In my opinion it's quite balanced as of now. The buying or selling pressure will have to decide about the eventual outcome.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Impressive depth on Huobi




You can say that again. With the liquidity on Huobi, there is no reason for me to look at any other exchange for analysis. Nobody can move the market if Huobo won't let them.

BTW, where is that screenshot from? At first, thought it was Bitcoinity, but...
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Impressive depth on Huobi



Jump to: