Jorge has hypnotised you
To interpret his input you need to work from his premise, I believe it goes like this. Bitcoin is not an investment but a bet with unknowable odds. Every input thereafter is an attempt at manipulating the odds in a 0 sum game.
That is a brilliant summary. Better said than he ever said it.
Indeed, the first part of @Adrian-x's summary of my posts is quite correct, if a bit depressing. (Like realizing, at a conference, that the significant contributions of your 9-year Ph.D. work fit in two slides and can be explained in 20 minutes, including "let's thank the speaker, we have plenty of time for questions".
)
The second part is silly, though: what effect could my posts here have on the mood of the Chinese
fermented tea bitcoin traders?
I belive that the odds of this game are unknowable, but it is not certain that it will be zero-sum (or negative-sum) in the strict sense. It depends on whether bitcoin will survive for a sufficiently long period.
He's obviously frustrated he'll need to return the party supplies he bought in preparation of Bitcoin hitting zero.
I told the paper plate and plastic cup supplier to be ready to deliver in mid-June, but warned him that I have absolutely no space left in my office, so he may have to hold them a little longer if The End gets delayed for some reason.
