Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 2918. (Read 26719707 times)

legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
                            BTC next Movement ?
                                      1. 15k Cry
                                           2. 17.5k Cool
                                       3. 20.5k Kiss
I don't care BTC moves to 15k, 17.5k and 20.5k.
As far as I know BTC is always moving up.

Whatever happens BTC will still be on top.
Tell your friends so that they never hesitate to hold BTC.
Bitcoin price is pumping and dumping depending on good news. You can't confirm Bitcoin will just keep pumping. I gave Bitcoin's Next Movement depending on Bitcoin News.

What you did was just throw out some random numbers (or maybe wishful numbers?), and after the fact you are saying that those numbers are based on news that has not yet happened.. but you still lack any specifics regarding what news would supposedly cause such numbers to play out more than some other somewhat random numbers.

There is no there behind your placing those specific numbers, so even if they were to happen at some point in time in the order that you had suggested that they would happen, there would be no indication that you had not just been lucky in the same sense that a guess can end up being lucky.

                            BTC next Movement ?
                                      1. 15k Cry
                                           2. 17.5k Cool
                                       3. 20.5k Kiss
Who cares where is the price right now? As long as I have the extra money in my pocket it will go to BTC mostly. If you made a steady investment in BTC in every week or month for the last 5 years you are already a millionaire by now. So I think we are still early and investing for another 5 years is also luck that many of us haven't realized yet.

Most of us should realize and accept that past BTC performance does not in any kind of way guarantee future results, and surely we can see that you would have had to invest an average of $215 per week for the past 5 years (which would amount to about $56,115 invested) if you would have wanted to have been a millionaire in today's BTC prices (which would be 53+ BTC).  Maybe easier said than done, in terms of being able to consistently buy that quantity of BTC on a weekly basis.

It is really difficult to know that if you were to invest $215 per week starting now, if such investment efforts would get you to $1million or anywhere even close to that amount - even though I would not be recommending NOT to do your best, whatever that might be.  Some people can afford $215 per week, but others might need to start out with a smaller amount, and it is better not to over do it if you are wanting to make sure that you do not have to sell BTC at a time that is anything other than completely your own choosing.

You are now regretting why you have not invested in BTC back in 2013

You are probably onto something when you suggest that there are a lot of folks who are regretting that they had not gotten into BTC in 2013, and it would be difficult to speculate if they would have been able to hang onto all of their BTC through the pretty extreme BTC volatility that happened since then.  Maybe a DCA buyer on a weekly basis might have been able to tolerate the volatility better, as long as they stuck with their ongoing DCA buying, and a mere $10 per week would have gotten someone quite close to millionaire at today's BTC prices with about 4.9 BTC accumulated and ONLY about $4,700 total invested.

Maybe one of the difficulties would have been to continue to invest $10 per week, and depending on the person's circumstances, there could have been temptations from any of the directions, to sell, to stop the DCA, to increase the DCA.. or some variety of all or any of those strategies, even though $10 per week seems fairly benign.. it becomes less benign when the value appreciates to such high levels that surpass expectations.. so it remains difficult to either stay consistent with an investment approach or for us, from the outside, to speculate that such person investing $10 per week for 9 years would have been close to reaching $1 milllion in value in today's BTC valuations (with about 4.9 BTC).

trust me

Do you know something profound DVlog?  

I cannot really disagree with you about your punchline in terms of recommending investing in BTC, but I have some difficulties when you seem to be suggesting some kind of assurance. .but maybe I am reading too much into the way that you are phrasing these matters, when your overall idea is not necessarily a bad one... and I largely agree with the idea of getting the fuck started buying BTC and for each person to figure out some kind of personally tailored approach. even though the consistent message would be that if they either do not have any BTC or they have only whimpy amounts (less than 20 BTC.. hahahahahaha saved you @Biodom on this one), then they should be considering ways to attempt to add to their BTC stash in whatever reasonable and prudent way that they believe fits for their circumstances.. and maybe even a bit of aggressiveness would not hurt, either... how about $100 a week for those who might be able to accomplish such?

you will regret it even after 5 years from now by thinking why I haven't invested in BTC in 2022?

Fair enough.  Get started now rather than waiting.  How about you DVlog?  Did you start this year or did you start earlier..? Your forum registration date is January of this year.  I would imagine that there are some folks who started recently, even some who started in the last couple of years who may well be decently under water currently.  Sure, keep on buying seems to be a good strategy, but some folks have run out of money. maybe they bought higher and then maybe they even have been buying on dips, too?  I am not opposed to getting started, and figuring out some plan to deal with if you might have previously miscalculated BTC's price direction.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 4656
What you fellas think about tomorrow?
If inflation is up less than expected, then markets would start pricing in earlier pivot and, perhaps, just 50bp rise at the next meeting.
If inflation perked up (less likely, imho, since gas prices are not increasing), the we might jerk down.
Place your bets.


It might go up, or down, or go sideways tomorrow.

sorry, that prediction is not playable, Wink
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
What you fellas think about tomorrow?
If inflation is up less than expected, then markets would start pricing in earlier pivot and, perhaps, just 50bp rise at the next meeting.
If inflation perked up (less likely, imho, since gas prices are not increasing), the we might jerk down.
Place your bets.


It might go up, or down, or go sideways tomorrow.

legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 4656
What you fellas think about tomorrow?
If inflation is up less than expected, then markets would start pricing in earlier pivot and, perhaps, just 50bp rise at the next meeting.
If inflation perked up (less likely, imho, since gas prices are not increasing), the we might jerk down.
Place your bets.

Philosophically, if time is an illusion and everything that is going to happen already happened (in the block universe theory, see https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2018-09-02/block-universe-theory-time-past-present-future-travel/10178386 ), then bitcoin's success either happened or not happened. Let's hope for the former.

As a side note, it seems that this universe is devoid of advanced civilizations...perhaps an indication that some "things" did not happen...would be sad, really.
Still, there is a chance that those "things" did not happen so far, but would happen eventually...we have less a billion years on Earth (would have to move to a planet around a K-type star), then in 4 bil years a collision with Andromeda (dramatic skies).
A story here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wd0AYx8j0U
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R12DMYoYWFw
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846



And, Buddy, if you keep up with this 19K bullshit, I'm reporting you to the moderator.
And don't try to give me an explanation again. I've heard it all before.


hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
Speaking of merit farmers, I have not seen this many before. What changed?


I guess the sig campaigns pay better now
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
Quite eye opening on Elon Musk.  Shocked Especially the solar roof stuff. I had no idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN-kajBcyew&ab_channel=Thunderf00t

Bit sad really...  Cry


Thanks for the reminder...  I almost forgot about Thunderf00t in the last 2 years. 

His stuff is so entertaining..  many great vids on Musk
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
Speaking of merit farmers, I have not seen this many before. What changed?

Word on Bitcointalk Street... merit farming always best on the wob.
Land of Legends, sources, Merit spring etc.  



And, Buddy, if you keep up with this 19K bullshit, I'm reporting you to the moderator.
And don't try to give me an explanation again. I've heard it all before.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 2057
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
Speaking of merit farmers, I have not seen this many before. What changed?
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
I keep missing all the Legend  promotions. Seems to happen a lot in this here famous thread.
The Wob ..Bitcointalk home of the Og legends, legend wannabes and a few merit farmers to boot (and brave noobs)
I see one is gonna random trigger any day now. So congrats ahead of time bro.
You know who you are.

 
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2617
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
Quite eye opening on Elon Musk.  Shocked Especially the solar roof stuff. I had no idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN-kajBcyew&ab_channel=Thunderf00t

Bit sad really...  Cry
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
.....
You name your plants old lady names starting with M? Grin Grin

Love it. But what are the strains?
......
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60837156


.....
Come on, join the seniors in the garden while enjoying a little dressing, while harvesting.


Believe it or not, I don't indulge any more, (except on rare occasions) I just love growing. It's in my bones.
My older brother is visiting for harvest week however, and he does.
He's my tester. He tried some stuff that's been sitting in a mason jar on my kitchen shelf for 2 years which I thought maybe stale beyond sell date.
(This years stuff ain't ready yet, 2 to 3 weeks curing etc...)
He was like "holy shit bro, this is great!  They must be giving me fake THC % content at the dispensary. This is waaaay better!"
I shrugged my shoulders and was like "cool... Take all you want, I don't use it...buy me a six pack...lol"
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
The classic Dyson sphere with 100% efficiency would only be detectable by observing objects orbiting the star. Basically like a black hole. Inefficient sphere would radiate heat (infrared) and be detectable by JWST.

My thoughts too. Though there would surely be diminishing returns and you'd have some emissions at a very low frequency.

But a Dyson sphere can also be built as a ring or rings around a star. Let's say a strip with solar panels going around the star. This could be detectable because the ring could cause fluctuations in the light emitted by the star.

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


Only those with 100% efficiency would be undetectable in infrared, but 95% efficient would still be visible, apparently.
Dyson himself thought that it would radiate, but there is a lot of discussion back and forth.
See discussion of params here:
https://canmom.art/physics/dyson-spheres
and/or
https://www.tillett.info/2016/08/03/carnot-efficient-dyson-spheres-are-undetectable-by-infrared-surveys/
and
https://www.quora.com/If-a-star-were-fully-enclosed-in-a-Dyson-sphere-would-the-ambient-temperature-inside-increase-significantly-over-time
https://www.quora.com/Why-wouldnt-a-Dyson-sphere-eventually-just-melt-from-the-trapped-heat-of-the-star

Re ringworld-awesome sci-fi, not sure it could be detected with JWST, though...if it exists.
Generally, no systems are 100% efficient and heat radiation occurs.

It detected these concentric rings around a distant star, whatever they are.

https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-odd-ripples-image



Quote
The James Webb Space Telescope captured mysterious concentric rings around a distant star that astronomers are still working to explain.

The image, taken in July, was released on Twitter by citizen scientist Judy Schmidt, prompting a torrent of comments and head-scratching. It shows a star known as WR140 surrounded by regular ripple-like circles that gradually fade away. The circles, however, are not perfectly round, but have a somewhat square-like feel to them, prompting speculations about possible alien origins.

"I think it's just nature doing something that is simple, but when we look at it from only one viewpoint it seems impossible, at first, to understand that it is a natural phenomenon," Schmidt told Space.com in an email. "Why is it shaped the way it is? Why is it so regular?"

Quote
Mark McCaughrean, an interdisciplinary scientist in the James Webb Space Telescope Science Working Group and a science advisor to the European Space Agency, called the feature "bonkers" in a Twitter thread.

"The six-pointed blue structure is an artifact due to optical diffraction from the bright star WR140 in this #JWST MIRI image," he wrote. "But red curvy-yet-boxy stuff is real, a series of shells around WR140. Actually in space. Around a star."

He noted that WR140 is what astronomers call a Wolf-Rayet star, which have spat much of their hydrogen into space. These objects are also surrounded by dust, he added, which a companion star is sculpting into the strange shells.

Astronomers will know more soon thanks to a scientific paper currently under review about this mysterious phenomenon.

"Yes, those nested 'squircular' rings are real," Ryan Lau, an astronomer at NOIRLab and principal investigator of the project that acquired the observations, replied to the Twitter thread. "Our paper on this has been submitted so please stay tuned for the full story."

To me, the 'squircular' form of these rings (and they are probably rings, not half-rings due to simply less bright second half (of the ring)) is the most puzzling part.
Looking forward to the explanation of a strange form.

This is the dummied down explanation.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/star-duo-forms-fingerprint-in-space-nasa-s-webb-finds

Quote
... dust rings emanating from a pair of stars. Located just over 5,000 light-years from Earth, the duo is collectively known as Wolf-Rayet 140.

Each ring was created when the two stars came close together and their stellar winds (streams of gas they blow into space) met, compressing the gas and forming dust. The stars’ orbits bring them together about once every eight years; like the growth of rings of a tree’s trunk, the dust loops mark the passage of time.

“We’re looking at over a century of dust production from this system,” said Ryan Lau, an astronomer at NSF’s NOIRLab and lead author of a new study about the system, published today in the journal Nature Astronomy.

This is the full explanation written in intricate astronomical jargon.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-022-01812-x
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
By the way, some six days ago I got a feeling of a kind of tingling pain on the right side of my scalp, and when I brushed my teeth I felt pain in my gum on the right side. I didn't think much of it at first, but yesterday I got blister in my scalp as well so I went to see a doctor today, and it turns out I have shingles. So now I'm on valaciclovir, the pain isn't as bad as I thought it would be though.

Sending best wishes.



 That would be like a death sentence for me.  I'm terribly allergic to cats.


The doctor is en route with a different box.






Did he give a prescription to pick up from the chemist too?

Jump to: