This reminded me of this guy's post
wow I can't even read this thread: I'd already ignored everyone here 
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 32588. (Read 26609644 times)
September 11, 2013, 03:48:06 PM
This reminded me of this guy's post
September 11, 2013, 03:46:56 PM
I personally think that the dump was just a bear trap. I have nothing to back this claim.
Except simple common sense?Someone invested a lot of money steadily maintaining the price while accumulating a lot of coins during July and August.
They're not going to let a couple of smallish whale dumps seriously decrease the value of their hoarded stash.
Hence my earlier post of the picture of the big whale eating the smaller whale. You know? The one following the pictures of a beartrap and a bear shorn like a sheep.
No one is stronger than market, if the market really wants to go down, it will go down. Even whales with lots of money can get fiatless or just unable to deposit much sooner than they expect (and they went pretty far already).
September 11, 2013, 03:39:54 PM
-- Poster Ignored Message --
I've never put anyone on ignore, no matter how foolish or obnoxious they try to be.
Foolishness and obnoxiousness have long been cornerstones of humor.
September 11, 2013, 03:31:36 PM
I personally think that the dump was just a bear trap. I have nothing to back this claim.
Except simple common sense?Someone invested a lot of money steadily maintaining the price while accumulating a lot of coins during July and August.
They're not going to let a couple of smallish whale dumps seriously decrease the value of their hoarded stash.
Hence my earlier post of the picture of the big whale eating the smaller whale. You know? The one following the pictures of a beartrap and a bear shorn like a sheep.
September 11, 2013, 03:02:21 PM
September 11, 2013, 02:02:14 PM
September 11, 2013, 01:56:23 PM
That's why TA is completely useless. But for some odd reason a lot of people here refuse to accept this.
Can you point me to a single post in this thread that has a proper TA?
Any of my posts, dummy.
Yeah, that goes without saying. Let me rephrase the question:
Can you point me to a single post in this thread (Walsoraj's posts exclusive) which has TA right?
I wish people would stop quoting that idiot.
September 11, 2013, 01:48:03 PM
That's why TA is completely useless. But for some odd reason a lot of people here refuse to accept this.
Can you point me to a single post in this thread that has a proper TA?
Any of my posts, dummy.
Yeah, that goes without saying. Let me rephrase the question:
Can you point me to a single post in this thread (Walsoraj's posts exclusive) which has TA right?
Thanks.
And the obvious answer to your question is: No. Other than walz, nobody has any clue what they are talking about.
September 11, 2013, 01:46:48 PM
That's why TA is completely useless. But for some odd reason a lot of people here refuse to accept this.
Can you point me to a single post in this thread that has a proper TA?
Any of my posts, dummy.
Yeah, that goes without saying. Let me rephrase the question:
Can you point me to a single post in this thread (Walsoraj's posts exclusive) which has TA right?
September 11, 2013, 01:44:04 PM
That's why TA is completely useless. But for some odd reason a lot of people here refuse to accept this.
Can you point me to a single post in this thread that has a proper TA?
Any of my posts, dummy.
September 11, 2013, 01:41:25 PM
That's why TA is completely useless. But for some odd reason a lot of people here refuse to accept this.
Can you point me to a single post in this thread that has a proper TA?
September 11, 2013, 01:02:24 PM
September 11, 2013, 12:39:27 PM
Since this has become the catch-all thread I'll just leave this here.
http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/should-we-trust-the-nist-recommended-ecc-parameters
Quote
Reasons for concern. Bruce Schneier has written that he has seen a bunch of secret Snowden documents, and after seeing them, he recommends classical integer discrete log-based cryptosystems over elliptic curve cryptography. When asked to elaborate on why he thinks we should avoid elliptic-curve cryptography, he writes:
I no longer trust the constants. I believe the NSA has manipulated them through their relationships with industry.
I no longer trust the constants. I believe the NSA has manipulated them through their relationships with industry.
http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/should-we-trust-the-nist-recommended-ecc-parameters
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nsa-and-ecc-289795
September 11, 2013, 12:39:11 PM
Since this has become the catch-all thread I'll just leave this here.
http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/should-we-trust-the-nist-recommended-ecc-parameters
Quote
Reasons for concern. Bruce Schneier has written that he has seen a bunch of secret Snowden documents, and after seeing them, he recommends classical integer discrete log-based cryptosystems over elliptic curve cryptography. When asked to elaborate on why he thinks we should avoid elliptic-curve cryptography, he writes:
I no longer trust the constants. I believe the NSA has manipulated them through their relationships with industry.
I no longer trust the constants. I believe the NSA has manipulated them through their relationships with industry.
http://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/should-we-trust-the-nist-recommended-ecc-parameters
Nice find.
September 11, 2013, 12:02:14 PM
September 11, 2013, 11:02:21 AM
September 11, 2013, 10:09:04 AM
I thought the buy on monday looked a little light.
He should have waited.
I was reading your nervous twitching becoming fear.
Instead, jumpy whale clearly fears competition.
He should have waited.
I was reading your nervous twitching becoming fear.
Instead, jumpy whale clearly fears competition.
September 11, 2013, 10:04:54 AM
So does everyone think we rocket up from here?
Bids sure are taking off, asks arent filling in very quickly...
Of course, 14mill in bids still isnt all that much. Im still really 50/50 on whether or not we make a real rise from here [Something like 150 is almost certain] or push back down to ~110
I think if the price does go up, its solely because of people stocking up and storing them. Not that it invalidates it, just that instead of being demand there is just less selling pressure.
Bids sure are taking off, asks arent filling in very quickly...
Of course, 14mill in bids still isnt all that much. Im still really 50/50 on whether or not we make a real rise from here [Something like 150 is almost certain] or push back down to ~110
I think if the price does go up, its solely because of people stocking up and storing them. Not that it invalidates it, just that instead of being demand there is just less selling pressure.
Not unless it becomes clear that new deposits are coming in.
If new deposits start coming in, we can assume Gox has fixed its fiat withdrawal issues. If that happens, expect masssssss flood of sales. We crash.
I think that is an overly simplistic view. Psychologist Fallacy.
Fuck off, it is pure reason, I am aristotle!
I could fairly accuse you of the same fallacy
September 11, 2013, 10:02:12 AM
September 11, 2013, 09:59:31 AM
So does everyone think we rocket up from here?
Bids sure are taking off, asks arent filling in very quickly...
Of course, 14mill in bids still isnt all that much. Im still really 50/50 on whether or not we make a real rise from here [Something like 150 is almost certain] or push back down to ~110
I think if the price does go up, its solely because of people stocking up and storing them. Not that it invalidates it, just that instead of being demand there is just less selling pressure.
Bids sure are taking off, asks arent filling in very quickly...
Of course, 14mill in bids still isnt all that much. Im still really 50/50 on whether or not we make a real rise from here [Something like 150 is almost certain] or push back down to ~110
I think if the price does go up, its solely because of people stocking up and storing them. Not that it invalidates it, just that instead of being demand there is just less selling pressure.
Not unless it becomes clear that new deposits are coming in.
If new deposits start coming in, we can assume Gox has fixed its fiat withdrawal issues. If that happens, expect masssssss flood of sales. We crash.
Jump to: