Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3361. (Read 26714984 times)

legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Citing Snowden as if he were a bitcoin  expert..

Ok.   Roll Eyes

On a slightly different topic.  I was going to edit my earlier post in which I was talking about my own considerations of the 200-week moving average as BTC's historical price bottom in light of some of Saylor's latest comments, too.. but since postenings are continue to happen so rapidly in this here thread, I decided to add this content to this current post instead.. I id not want my edit to get lost in the flood of ongoing postenings.. NO one can keep up anymore, not even bots (not going to name any names, here)... .. fuck you guys posting soo much.. kettle black, again..

[...] Just like I am not going to apologize for my assertion of the historical strength of the 200-week moving average as the BTC  price bottom, [...]

IMO, from here forward, continual reliance on 200 WMA is embarrassing.  200 WMA is dead as a Bitcoin Bottom.  Failure to acknowledge this reeks of “Reality Distortion Field”—a public relations problem that is particularly acute, when the public is already primed with many years of “Bitcoin is a cult” propaganda.

Seems way too early to be making broad proclamations about the death of the significance of the 200-week moving average as a bottom.. or a bottom is or whatever we are going to end up calling it or changing it to.. if we even need to change it.. just depends upon context.. I am not going to presume more down from here even though it is surely decently possible to have more down from here.

Please reread my post about gold.  You entirely missed the point.  I was not talking about gold, in itself:  I was providing an analogy to digital gold, i.e. Bitcoin.

I don't want to suffer any more than I already did when I read it the first time.

You seem to have as tendency to weave through a lot of abstractions and you seem to also frequently leave out important points, so that might be part of the reason that I cannot accept a lot of your framings on a variety of your price related discussions.. and even other stuff related to bitcoin's investment thesis and personal ways to manage risk, especially.  Horey sheit..!!

Gold buyers don’t say such things to themselves as, “This astrological line on a chart is our bottom, because past performance predicts future results.”

If a statistical line representing historical prices is crossed, die-hard goldbugs do not suddenly buckle at the knees and cry, “I can’t believe it!  We shouldn’t be here!”

bitcoin has quite a few differences from gold including but not limited to:  bitcoin is very immature asset class so is likely taking a lot of whatever monetary value that gold may have still had.. and gold is likely not going to lose all of its monetary value.. but quite a lot of it.

bitcoin is bringing way more abilities for way wider adoption of bitcoin because fractions can be bought..

I am sick of hearing about gold in this thread.. we talked about it so much in previous years going back to the beginning of my membership on the forum.. sick of it.. sick of it.. repetition..   Your points in regard to your bitcoin gold comparison.. even if you are wanting to be charitable towards bitcoin.. .. if you have any.. are not resonating with me..

As I now write, we are about 10% below 200 WMA.  We recently went much further below.  We have been below it for too long, and gone too deep below it for too long, to pretend that this it was even approximately the bottom (as it was in all previous crashes).

Clinging to 200 WMA as having some special significance is now Considered Harmful(TM).

Just because you want the 200-week moving average to lose its relevance/significance does not mean that it will lose its relevance/significance... so stop  ur lil selfie in trying to ascribe that I am clinging to it, too much blah blah blah.. that's bullshit..

I give less than two shits about the 200-week moving average.. except that it seems to continue to be a very significant and relevant consideration.. just like the stock to flow is. . .whether either one of them holds or not or whatever spin you are trying to get from bitcoin's price being below such 200-week moving average price area for a week so far... yes the BTC spot price has been up to 20% below the 200-week moving average so far, as well.

Let’s focus on the fundamentals.  Not on TA lines.  

"We " can focus on whatever the fuck "we" like.

You can go live your lil fantasy of hoping the BTC price comes down while you proclaim that you are not hoping for such all that you like.. Your hope is not going to add likelihood for it to happen.  maybe it will go down, and maybe it will not.

Gold buyers who bought gold around $260 about two decades ago were buying because, um, it’s gold.  Of course, it is valuable!  And Bitcoin?

I am not going ot get into this.. you know why because your dumbass attempt at a comparison is a stretch of relevance at best.  I already mentioned that bitcoin happens to be about 1,000x better than gold..  but bitcoin is also less than 1/10th the value of gold in terms of market cap but sure it could take 50 to 200 years to work out the matching of the BTC price to the actual comparison relative to gold.



Regarding my own personal leverage:

You are obviously a sophisticated investor with decades of experience.

Please just help me remind people who think they are “sophisticated” to remember that:

  • As I recently mentioned somewhere, it has happened that a pricing oracle mispriced BTC at $5402 due to alleged “software errors” when BTC was trading around $43,500.  No actual BTC was traded at $5402, but people were liquidated based on a BTC price of $5402.  (Correction of what I said before:  The “erroneous” publishers published negligible BTC prices, not “absolutely zero” BTC prices; the effect on the average was the same.)
  • In October 2021, BTC actually flash-crashed to $8k on Binance.  Only for about 40 seconds—but, well, someone please tell me, is Binance’s liquidator any more forgiving than others of brief dips? Roll Eyes
  • Unlike a traditional margin call, cryptocurrency exchange liquidation generally requires only a dip one microdollar below your liquidation price for one microsecond.
    The whole cryptocurrency margin ecosystem has the incentives of loan-sharking.  Those incentives are exploited in full accord with the ethics of people who also profit from pump-and-dump Ponzi-coins.

    You need to be either stupid or crazy to take a loan on these terms, for almost any purpose.  To avoid accusations of deficient IQ tantamount to mental retardation, I plead a bout of temporary insanity.  Do I know better than to do this?  Yes, I do.  Why did I do it - why, why, why!?
  • Leverage is a curve, not linear.  (That’s also why it’s so profitable, if you avoid getting rekt!)  Thus, if BTC is priced at $5k, your 0.5% leverage will suddenly skyrocket much higher than a newbie would expect.  Mentioned for the sake of any newbies reading this—not to insult your intelligence or experience.
  • I myself started out with low leverage—not as low as yours, but pretty damn low.  I also started with a definite strategy to deleverage and exit, and sufficient assets to do so if necessary.  Part of my problem is that I did not obey my own plans—but only part.  
You are engaging in a little fantasy if you speculate that my characterization of my leverage f the last year or two going from 0.5% and up to 1% means that there is any chance that I would get liquidated.. I do not fuck around with those various exchange products.. so my use of the term leverage is describing some cashflow management employment methods that you seem to NOT understand or want to understand such dynamics of various kinds of ways to use debt instruments to your advantage and surely sometimes there might be opportunity cost or whatever ways that the debt is used might not end up profiting as much as anticipated .. but anyhow for you, as soon as I mention that I had used leverage, you presume that I am fucking around with some gambling and with exchange products or dependency of the exchange prices, which is not true.  I do not fuck around with that shit.

I may have already said too much about my use of leverage situation because you are so desperate and trying to grasp upon anything and leading your imagination into fantasies, and you miss the point that I was making in terms of how little I am employing such tools or putting any of my finances at risk. even though surely there was room for me to have had used debt leverage more than I did in the past year and a half or so, there was some just coincidence in regards to what kinds of deals that I had entered into in the past year and a half-or so... and whatever.. I said enough on the topic.. and you seem to want to read it as if something similar to you is going on when it is not even close to whatever fucking around you were doing and proclaiming your actions to be prudent and/or to be innocent.


Anyway, what was that about the best-laid plans of mice and men?
Quote from: “To a Mouse”, by Robert Burns (1785)
But, Mousie, thou art no thy lane
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes o' mice an’ men
Gang aft agley,
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain
For promis’d joy.
[/li]
[/list]

For these reasons, I have positively decided that if I ever use leverage or BTC-backed debt again, it will be either:

  • With a pro-grade robot.  A robot can react faster than any human.  That does not protect against buggy oracles or near-instantaneous flash-crashes, but it does cover almost any other scenario.
  • For extremely short-term loans.  For example, I currently have some assets locked in stake which I cannot release without ETH gas I cannot afford.  (Yes, I wanted to grab some ETH at $900 recently for this.  No money!)  When the time comes that I decide to unlock it, I may borrow against my itty-bitty BTC to buy ETH (or even just borrow ETH), unlock shitcoins from stake contracts, sell some shitcoins to cover the loan immediately so that I can immediately withdraw my BTC, and then sell some more shitcoins to buy more BTC.  It should all be over in minutes.  To get rekt that way, I would need bad luck tantamount to winning a negative lottery.  [Edit:  Bad example.  Duh.  The contract requires 7 days to unlock, during which time the money is untouchable—and its volatile value at the end is unpredictable at the beginning.  That is why I didn’t, couldn’t use this money to save my BTC.  Thanks, POSification of the world!  I currently have no idea how I will retrieve that money without taking other losses to buy ETH I don’t want.  Thanks, Ethereum!]

I don’t think either of those falls into the category of “relapsing drug addict or compulsive gambler”.

I guess you are cured, then.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2373
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
strawbs currently has 814 activity.  Since he now has passed the merit threshold, his account is predestined to reach Legendary rank at an activity level known only to the administrators.  Some vague statements have been made about how this is actually calculated; I forgot what and where years ago, due to apathy.


Ah, I though that was a merit thing, not activity.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 320
Take profit in BTC. Account PnL in BTC. BTC=money.
Wait for it, we're gonna bounce any minute now. It's gonna be strong. A real trend reversal. Bullish phase incoming.

OK, now I'm getting scared.
For the first time in many many months price goes below my DCA and the local Llama spots out this???
Is this what they were talking about as "Max Pain?"

I doubt that we are even close to max pain...

bears are going to push the BTC price down as low as they can and hold it there as long as they can.

Good call, Jay.

When I saw that, I thought: "did I even say that?"  Then I clicked on it, and I also noticed the date.

Holy fucking shit that was more than a month an d a half ago whe we first broke below the 100-week moving average at $35k.


In other words, it seems to me that you are a little out of context in your leaving some ambiguity in when that statement was made, no?

When there is a timestamp right there atop the quote, in adequately conveys the time of the post to the reader.

If the reader can read.

“Out of context”?  “Ambiguity”?  If you were confused, take responsibility for your own carelessness and inattentiveness.

Moreover, I am puzzled as to why you would object.  It is a little WO tradition to test people’s predictions.  I have seen you do similarly to ImThour, to criticize his nonsense:  Pull up quotes later.  Here, far from criticizing, I said that you made a good call.  It was obviously a good call.


P.S., that obviously wasn’t when we broke $35k.  I quoted the nearest ChartBuddy post before yours, to show this.  It was days after we had smashed down through $35k.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 320
Take profit in BTC. Account PnL in BTC. BTC=money.
...get your shit together...

Don't get me wrong.. I am not suggesting that all credit cards are paid off and completely extract yourself from all the mess that you got into over your 50+ years of life or whatever it might happen to be..

LOL.  You are so far off target, I am quite sure you are being deliberately obtuse:  You are not that dumb.

I have no credit cards.  I used to, once upon a time.  I cut them up and threw them away, because I am against that whole system.

As it now stands, I have zero debt of any kind.  At the time I started posting here last month, my entire debt load consisted of a single margin account that ate almost all of my assets.  I paid that off in full on 18 June 2022.  For years until January 2022, I had zero debt.  I think that I am not bad at keeping my “shit” together, as you so elegantly put it.

Now, I am unsure whether I should sadly thank you for wasting your time trying to give me advice that is entirely inapplicable to me, or I should wonder if you are trying to discredit me by misrepresenting me as some debt-ridden defi degen who just can’t seem to “get [his] shit together”.

I have previously suffered life catastrophes that wiped me out financially.  Unlike my recent loss, those were not my fault.  I have said that before.

What happened before is none of anybody’s business.  I will not give any hints.  But let’s put it this way:  If, in the hypothetical, I had been bankrupted by the medical expenses of a family member’s prolonged terminal illness, then you would not mistreat me as some “gambler”, and you would not dare to give me some outrageously condescending “get your shit together” lecture.

It wasn’t that, but it was equally in the realm of tragic misfortunes that can befall anyone.  Newsflash:  Life is unfair.  I have learned to take that in stride.

I will not say any more about my life, or what is really going on with me.  I have exposed too much already—for my own safety and privacy, I have exposed too much in a public forum.  It is anyway none of your business.  I am not asking for your advice, and I do not need your advice.

Suffice it to say that I consciously choose to be “overinvested” in Bitcoin, as a proportion of my assets.  Ever since I got deeply into Bitcoin, I have always made that choice—for principle, not for profit.  It is my choice to make, and I very well understand it.

By the way.. you seem to be trolling me with your continued ongoing nonsense question about whether you are overinvested.

No.  I have seen you tell people they were overinvested for keeping all their life savings in Bitcoin, without significant fiat, and without sufficient other investment assets.  Trolling you?

In the post to which I hereby reply, you give some of your standard advice about starting at 1% to 25% of one’s portfolio.  That looks low to me.  Trolling you?

And it is a legitimate question how I can simultaneously be a “lowcoiner” with too little BTC to care about it, and also “overinvested” in BTC.

I know much more about finance than you presume.  Any professional financial advisor in the world would tell me that with my current overall level of assets, I am drastically overinvested in Bitcoin.  Overinvested and overexposed.  I do not care.  That is my choice—a choice made consciously and intelligently.

Seems to me that there are no shortcuts outside of gambling.. and I do not recommend gambling..  

Gamblers’ intuitions are usually wrong.

Protip:  It is mathematically proved that for a certain described “red-and-black” model of a game of chance, the optimal strategy is “bold play”:  Bet as much as you need to for winning the whole gain you want in one shot, rather than attempting many smaller bets.  The result has been extended and adjusted to various game scenarios.  This paper has a good description, and a bibliography:

https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0412362

Needless to say, I do not recommend “bold play” gambling as investment advice.

In other words, there has been plenty of time to stack sats.. .. including the last year from the first correction down to $28.6k in May, June, July 2021..

Why do you even mention this?  Are you paying attention?

As of January 2022, I had plenty of Bitcoin.  Never enough, but a decently-sized chunk.

I did not buy in 2021 (except for my usual adjustments from altcoins), because I do not usually buy in bull markets!  I prefer to buy in bear markets.  Accordingly, I have always loved bear markets.

I missed the dip in July 2021, because I like to ignore the market.  That is my privilege, when my coins are safely in my wallet where they belong.

POS diptwats have no power over me (or anyone else who wants to talk about stake in relation to their bitcoin investment strategies) or my use of the word stake in terms of its already existing parlance.

You have power over you use the word.

You are speaking to me as if BTC is a governance token which, on the basis of wealth, grants a club card for the privilege of expressing respectable opinions about Bitcoin.  And you are leveraging that as a subtle type of ad hominem to discredit such of my other propositions as you find disagreeable, without addressing my arguments on their merits.

Stop that nonsense.

I have known total degens who had >100x more BTC than I have ever had.  All they knew was greed and stupidity.

I have also known kind, intelligent people who gave far more to the Bitcoin community than I ever have—who wound up with less BTC than I had once upon a time.

Ultimately, ideas need to stand on their own merits.  If you disagree with me, and if your best argument is to call me a “low-coiner” because I just suffered a catastrophic near-wipeout, then that about sums up the credibility of your own arguments, and your ability to defend them.

(thus your trolling of the idea as well as your trolling me about some of your other dumb ideas related to proof of stake and also bitcoin as a stock and a few other dumb and/or misleading points that you continue to make.. a couple of your recent dumb ones related to gold supposedly being comparable to bitcoin, the 200-week moving average as being broken.,

[...]
why are you even talking about that shitcoin.. aka gold

If you think that the 200 WMA is not broken, then you are living in fantasyland.  And if you were to give investment advice based on it being a bottom, after it is broken, then that would be outright dishonest.

As for gold, you are being deliberately obtuse in calling it a “shitcoin”.  Calling gold a “shitcoin” is not a serious argument; it tends to show that I am wasting my time in this discussion.

I have always considered gold and Bitcoin to be complementary; and I have always said that Bitcoiner arguments that deprecate gold are as ill-considered as goldbugs who deprecate Bitcoin.  But that is beside the point:  I was not talking about gold, but about Bitcoin.

You seem to have a problem with my arguing for Bitcoin’s fundamental value.  I don’t know why.  Do you hate Bitcoin?

Reality does not give a hoot about your obsession with some lines on a chart:  In the long term, reality settles on fundamental value.  Now, I have gone “back to basics” and argued persuasively that the breaking of 200 WMA does not matter.  I have argued persuasively that in the long term, it does not matter how low Bitcoin now tumbles.

I think that is important:  Just a few days ago, I saw right here in WO some Bitcoiners get scared that were were deep under the magical 200 WMA line.  Scared.  Because we broke some meaningless lines on a chart:  The 200 WMA, the 2017 cycle top...  Oh, will you now tell me that the 2017 top was not now broken “because reasons”?  Anyway, I think it’s important to tell people that these things do not matter.  Bitcoin still valuable.  Even if the bottom is not yet in (there is no guarantee that we’ve bottomed!), this little downturn will someday be a subject for laughter.  “Oh, do you remember when Bitcoin crashed so hard that it smashed all of the dumb TA bottoms?  Well, look at it now!”

I have argued persuasively that Bitcoin, like gold, can survive very deep bear markets with no precedent in any TA juju.  Do you disagree?  Now that, in fact, many of your own TA beliefs have been thoroughly violated, do you believe that Bitcoin will die?

Your dismissal of my ideas as “dumb” rather applies a word that describes your reply here.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 798
I stand with Palestine.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 875
Merit: 1362


Thanks cAPS. Unfortunately I think I’m going to have delay the purchase of my mountain house and therefore also  delay future invitations to visit (for obvious btc price related reasons!).

In the words of Juba: “But not yet. Not yet.”

legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
2. You don't understand the difference between crypto and Bitcoin.

Why don't you explain it to me genius.

Bitcoin is Crypto but crypto isn't Bitcoin.
Crypto is an asset class for a whole variety of assets from NFTs to DAOs...

Hope this clears things up for you...

Oh fuck..


 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You need more than a slap.. Wilhelm





Bawb.. help..





We (beyond royal) really need you this time.




I will be nicer to you in the future..




  #nohomo -


Personally, I would even be very interested to see what could come next, something which is even better than BTC... I mean, wouldn't that be something ? imagine that, something NEW that comes along and makes most BTC holders think, yes, yes this , this is even better...


Oh gawd.. you  are truly delusional.

Are you sure that you clicked on the correct website..

You seem lost. Do you even understand bitcoin?

would you support it?  I wonder how many would be able to see it even if it were in front of their faces.. I wonder how many would be able to be objective about it?  (and would talk about it in public BEFORE they gained a meaningful position)

Let's go along with your little fantasy.

If there is something better than bitcoin, then of course, value should be moved over to that.

Hopefully, you understand that part of the difficulty in getting folks to switch over is that fantasylandia something that you are hypothesizing about has to be something like 10x better than bitcoin to even have a chance of displacing bitcoin, so your little fantasy about something that is 10% better, 50% better, or even 2x or 3x better is not enough.. so there is no need to switch  from bitcoin to some fantasy project that is OINLY - a little bit - better than bitcoin  .

Do you believe that there is going to be anything that is 10x or more better than BTC:

Get a fucking grip.

Anyways.... just my point of view.

A little (I really mean a lot) lame, even though you try to describe it as if it were something insightful and revelatory..

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Even with less than 0.05 BTC, I am drastically “overinvested” in BTC as % of all the money and investment assets that I have.

From the various stories that I heard form you.. it does not sound like 0.05 BTC would be overinvested, and there are not too many scenarios in which 0.05 BTC would be over invested, but I suppose you can make those kind of determinations if you believe that they adequately describe your situation in terms of helping you to figure out how you want to act going forward, if at all.

Jay, I just lost almost all of my assets.  0.05 BTC is a lot of money to me right now!

I have already leaked way too much information about my finances; I don’t want to give exact, or even approximate numbers on what else I have.  But for a real-life reductio ad absurdum, let’s put it this way:

When I hit a personal local bottom in 2017, I knew that I had to get some Bitcoin.  At some point, a family member gave me local fiat equivalent to about $400 for food and other basic survival.  I used half of it to buy BTC.  Would you call that “overinvested”?  

We may well be talking past each other.. because I am not recommending overinvesting as a strategy (or a good thing) in the context that you seem to be using it.. because I do not recommend gambling as a way of investing.

In other words, there is almost no fucking way that either I can (or anyone else with any level of practical prudence - beyond the level of a snot nosed 14-year old - no offense to snot-nosed 14-year olds- in these here parts - sorry to be speaking for others) can necessarily go over every little basics with all of the forum members - (and maybe that is one of the reasons that I thought that it might be a good idea for you to get some kind of a mentor?), and one of the basics 101 remains don't fucking invest in anything into anything until you get your shit together first so that you can determine that you have a budget to even be investing.

Don't get me wrong.. I am not suggesting that all credit cards are paid off and completely extract yourself from all the mess that you got into over your 50+ years of life or whatever it might happen to be.. first before investing, but I am suggesting to figure out all your shit; including knowing your debts, liabilities, cashflows and future expenses and aspects about evaluating various properties and investments that you  already have.. and some other aspects of your personality / psychology - risk tolerance, etc..   These kinds of basics should all be within the grasp of normie newbies to be anle to achieve or to learn how to do it, but also some normie newbies have some bad fucking habits, but some basic analysis of various facts (and does not mean that they are dumb but in fact might mean that they are too smart to recognize that they need to fix their basics and stop assuming that more complicated is better than basics)

In other words normie levels of skills and abilities should allow such normies newbies to figure out their basics so long as their ego is not always getting in the sway.. so that is an emotional matter too.. or need to filter out how smart or experienced that they are when some of that is getting in the way of their employing basics..

Yes, you need to have your basics covered first, such as expenses and even an emergency fund and potentially a variety of ways to have emergency expenses in the event that your cash flow has some interruptions so that you cannot cover your basis living expenses.

When I was fresh out of high school and I did not have shit to my name and barely any income, I learned quite a few of these basics, put them to practice over and over and even made a lot of misassessments had misunderstandings about evaluations but still striving for improvements, and I made a lot of mistakes along the way, but I still started to developed some good habits to project my cashflow out ahead 3-6 months in the beginning, but the more complicated my cashflow and expenses and assets and debts became, the longer I felt that I needed to project those matters out (frequently 24 months would be long enough on the outside), including always having various running cushions of never going below the cushion amount.. or almost never.. and always having various sources that I could draw upon in the event that I wanted to consume more, make some investment, take out a loan or whatever that I was doing or considering doing.

At the same time, I tended to shoot for investing at least 10% of my incoming cash on an ongoing basis, and I also made a whole fuck ton of mistakes by draining out some of the principle and/or profits at various points that ultimately were too early for consumption like items, some living expenses or even investments that were not really sufficiently good investments in the way that I know have learned to classify my consumption and investment a wee bit moar better in terms of giving some assessment to depreciating value and appreciating value to the best that those can be calculated.  .. and of course sometimes interfering with the powerful dynamic of compounding  ... learn learn learn.. and some good (and better) practices build therein, too.

If it had subsequently crashed, and I had declared “strong hands”, would you have said that I was unworried only because I had too little BTC to care?

I would say:  "what the fuck are  you doing?"  Do you got your shit together first?

I spent the next five years building up a decently-sized holding.  Not whale-sized, but respectable Bitcoiner middle-class.  I was well on my way from rags to riches.

 Well.. I doubt that it really matters if you had the best fucking risk management practices in the world, if you end up gambling with more than just a small fraction of your principle, then you are fucked if that gamble does not end up working 0ut.. except maybe learning some kind of lesson.. perhaps?..

It may take a while to learn not to be playing or fucking around with significant portions of your principle, but if you do it and lose it, then you are likely back to the basics..

Seems to me that there are no shortcuts outside of gambling.. and I do not recommend gambling..  

Sure maybe you have some advantages when you are older from your age and your experiences, if you just might have better habits to start over at a later date as compared to when you were 18 and just graduating from high school.. perhaps? perhaps?  but in the end seems to me that if you are not back to square 1 out of 100 squares, then you are at least back to square 10.. even if you might have been close to square 70 or whatever at the time of your principle losing fuckup

I am not nearly so badly off now as in 2017, but 0.05 BTC is suddenly a huge amount to me.  (Thanks, margin account!)

 Ok.. at least you are making progress.., I suppose.

Of note, 0.05 BTC is now money that I cannot afford to lose—in the sense of “don’t invest what you can’t afford to lose”.  Am I “overinvested”?  Should I hedge with some fiat by mindrusting? Roll Eyes

 You have to do what you believe is best in terms of how to balance your various preparations for the BTC price to move in either direction... including accounting for all of your personal circumstances including but not limited to your cashflow, other investments, view of bitcoin as compared with other investments, timeline, risk tolerance, time, skills and abilities to strategize, plan, research and learn along the way including tweaking strategies from time to time to consider trading, reallocating, use of leverage and/or financial instruments..  As you may well realize leverage and financial instruments are more advanced techniques and are not completely necessary.. especially prior to getting your basics down first.

By the way.. you seem to be trolling me with your continued ongoing nonsense question about whether you are overinvested.

Just for the sake that we are in a public thread. and I have my questions about whether you are even trying to learn about the concept.. (thus your trolling of the idea as well as your trolling me about some of your other dumb ideas related to proof of stake and also bitcoin as a stock and a few other dumb and/or misleading points that you continue to make.. a couple of your recent dumb ones related to gold supposedly being comparable to bitcoin, the 200-week moving average as being broken., no coiners and low coiners are the same as any other pro bitcoin person in terms of their cheerleading for downity (such as what you seem doing). and I would not put it past you to proclaim that the stock to flow model is broken, dead  and/or unimportant too.. hahahahaaha)..  You might be smart about some other topics but you have some problem conceptual areas, too. including but likely  to limited to the above topics.. are you broken?  #nohomo.. . Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Anyhow, just to attempt to flesh this matter out a wee  bit moar better, I frequently use the term "overinvested" in a kind of way intended to figure out some kind of state that any of us could get to in which we have reached our investment target  (whether that is somewhere in the 1-25% allocation level or some other level that we may well choose for ourselves and our circumstances) and we are sufficiently profitable (whether that is 2x, 5x, 25x, 100x or whatever, maybe in line with some of the SSS investment ideas of Rpietila)  and we also may have ended up overallocating... there are quite a few ways to still balance out those matters but still a kind of status of over-invested may well give more portfolio management flexibility and options.. and sure not as many options as reaching initial fuck you status or even more advanced fuck you status, but surely some advantages in terms of being sufficiently well in profits and having way more bitcoins than our target investment level.. and maybe another idea could still be whether there would be concerns about selling BTC on dips including but not limited to extreme BTC dips such as being at or below the 200-week moving average, which is really not a good practice to be selling too many BTC at such levels (even if in an overinvested status), but being overinvested still provides a lot of options to do whatever you want based on your own cashflow needs or things that might come up, even if it might have been better to try to be more strategic about trying to not sell BTC when its price is at historical low price points , as being at, near or below  the 200 week moving average like we are at currently.. and for more than the last week.. and maybe even there could be concerns about selling much BTC when the last month and a half to two months we have been below the 100-week moving average.. but being below the 100-week moving average is surely not as extreme as being at, near or below the 200-week moving average.

Again, what is this POS type of talk?

Fuck off with your nonsense.. You should know better than that.  I am not talking about proof of stake.. are you fucking retarded?  just asking for emphasis sake.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

When you tell me something fucking retarded, then maybe I should also tell you to fuck off with your nonsense:

Sounds good.

Let the market burn, as I frolic in the sunshine!

I think that we have already established that no coiners and low coiners have tendencies to be assholes in that kind of a way..

Therefore one of the likely strongest solutions from contributing towards mitigating your asshole tendencies is for you to get a meaningful and substantial stake in our lil precious.. so get out there dear trooper/soldier and get in the mode of stacking some sats.. stack a meaningful and substantial amount.. nothing whimpy like some other members... who will remain unnamed.. at least for the time being.    

It would probably apply to most people.  You are talking to me, not to most people.  I was patient before:  I only made a few snide remarks about your use of POS language.  Well, fuck off with that nonsense.

 Hardly even worth entertaining you on the topic.

Getting a stake in bitcoin is not talking about POS.

focus..

focus

focus..

I am not going to be told that my language does not make sense.. There is no reason to suggest that my use of the word stake has anything to do with POS.

POS diptwats have no power over me (or anyone else who wants to talk about stake in relation to their bitcoin investment strategies) or my use of the word stake in terms of its already existing parlance.

About 20 years ago, I took a drastic realized loss in the stock market.  The loss was in a fiat currency that I despise in principle, so I laughed and walked away.  “It’s only money.”

In the past five months, I have devoted my life to struggling to save my BTC that I betrayed by foolishly collateralizing it.  Months of private hell, clinging to my BTC.  I lost it anyway.  Now, I am in grieving—grieving.  It is not “only money”.  Bitcoin is money, and it is more than money:  To me, it is like a living creature.

Fuck off with your nonsense that somehow I don’t care enough because I don’t have enough.  You are insulting me, and rubbing salt in an open wound.

 Did someone say something mean to you on the internet?  that seems to be your issue.. not mine.  I am sufficiently describing the concept of getting stake and the motivations that are caused by levels of stake (whether you agree or not);. if it does not apply to you and your situation or not then so be it. that is your opinion and my opinion may differ, as I already said a few time.. no need to be insulted in regards to what others (including yours truly) might think, believe or how we might express our thoughts on a topic (including if we might be mistaking your situation or intentional in our mistakes, which I deny being intentionally any more rude than I need to be to make a point.. and I doubt that I am being disingenuine, either.. even though you can agree to disagree on that part of the matter too...

.. we can agree to disagree and you can take it personally if you like.. or you can try to remember that we are in a public thread and people are not necessarily going to cow tow to definitions or even your perceptions of whether or not you have enough stake or our perceptions about whether you have enough stake or if you might be action  like a no coiner in some ways wen you are cheering for downity.  .

To any extent that I may wish to see the bear market continue for awhile, it is only a desire not to get fucked both ways as I know often befalls people who lose their coins.  That leaves me as a more extreme, quite panicked and desperate version of the happy Bitcoiner in the bottom panel here:



Of course BTC's current price situation is not comfortable and of course it is stressful.. including more stressful for some folks as compared with other folks.. so I am not telling you to change your feelings either.. Whatever feelings that you have are yours, and it is your choice about whether you want to bring up your matters in this thread.. I am not trying to be purposefully mean, but I am not going to self-censor too much either.. so some of the interactions might not be good and we might not agree. .. and maybe you are not even in a great battle position currently anyhow (either financially or psychologically.. they are related and sometimes we cannot maintain any kind of detachment or separation), but you cannot really incentivize people to be nice, and if you demand it, then some people might even become meaner.. on purpose.. so I am not saying that I will do that.. but I might.. Times like this are emotional for a lot of us in varying kinds of ways..and maybe for different reasons.

A couple of days ago, I was invited to a party, and I came up with an excuse not to go, because I was not quite ready to deal with some of the "concerns" that were likely going to be expressed about my bitcoin situation from some no coiners that were going to be in attendance.. and we already had a history of interactions too...

Yesterday I did end up going to another gathering and some of those same "concerned" folks were present at that gathering, and for sure there were some who were very excited to raise "the bitcoin  question".. excitement.. wow.. .. but when they raised their concerns.. I was ready.. and pretty much I had to tell a couple of them that they are NOT as educated on the topic as they were self-proclaiming themselves to be merely based on recent and ongoing negative BTC price movements..    Some parts of our interactions were not comfortable, but we were able to get back to other topics and I did not have to end up  allowing their different perspective cause me to feel  like I needed to be overly confrontational than I was.. even though some confrontation ended up being necessary.. as I kind of anticipated was going to happen.. Anyhow, I did make a choice to avoid those same people for a couple of days prior to my own choice about when to actually interact with them and to have some ideas about some of the issues that they might end up raising, and in the end, they are not really well enough informed about the bitcoin topic beyond some mainstream news talking points that might come up from time to time to really be able to have any kind of sustainable conversation that really gets into bitcoin fundamentals or even some broader reasons why having a stake in bitcoin might be a prudent course o f action for them. even  if it is a small stake.. even though in the past few years they sometimes seem to be watching the BTC price charts on a more regular basis than they had been historically (unless they are just seeing such BTC price charts on TV sometimes).. and seem to have a tendency to rejoice whenever the BTC price is going down.. apparently they seem to get some thrills out of the BTC price going down.... hahahahaha, to each their own..

But “frolicking in the sunshine” is irrelevant to that.  Diamond hands DGAF—this is fine, and this is even fun.

My “frolicking in the sunshine” remark is my attitude towards bear markets—as long as I am not at liquidation risk, which now I am not.  It is what I did in previous bear markets, when I had much more BTC safely in my wallet where it belonged!

1 BTC = 1 BTC.  I laugh when the market burns!



Gold had a two-decade extreme bear market.  Anyone who bought gold at the wrong time had to wait an awful lot longer than four years to be not underwater.  I also think that was a politically motivated economic attack, though I don’t want to get into off-topic discussion here that will derail into other matters.  (I have mentioned this in some prior post, a few weeks ago...  Something about gold-producing countries under international sanctions.)

Only fools declared gold dead.  Smart people bought gold as low as ~$260, not so very long ago.

If we can escape from erroneous thinking about Bitcoin as “like a stock”, and really start treating it as digital gold, then there is ample precedent for shrugging off much worse crashes and bear markets than I now anticipate.  As bad as this one is.  Even if we are still nowhere near the bottom—maybe; maybe not; I am realistically pessimistic, but not prepared to make a call either way.


1) bitcoin is not gold.. it is likely about 1,000x better than gold.. but still could take 50 to 200 years or more before shown in bitcoin's price relative to gold's price.

2) if you sufficiently understand bitcoin, there is likely little to no need to have gold in your investment portfolio apart from various Armageddon  scenarios that have less than a 1% chance of happening. .. so maybe you would have 1% in your portfolio at most.

3) you do what you want in terms of your choice to allocate any resources to gold... it's a free country.

You entirely missed my point there.

Well... at least I made my points.. .. and again we are in a public thread.. so if you are making some obscure and supposedly profound point.. then I give less than two shits.. because your points, to the extent that you have any,  seem to be getting lost in terms of why are you even talking about that shitcoin.. aka gold in this here lovely and mostly non-controversial thread?    Tongue

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Oh.. and one last reiteration (and maybe repetition?) point..

I just thought of this.

NOT too many of us WO regulars have been historically sympathetic to anyone coming into the thread who wants the BTC price to stay down in order that they can stack some more BTC.. Most of us give few shits because we are and have been prepared for UP at $60k, $50k, $40k, $30k, and now at $20k .. so there is little or no incentive for those who have already been prepared for up and wearing our moonsuite to get more down to prepare for up because we were already prepared for up at those higher prices, too..

Another thing is that we could give less than two shits if low coiners or no coiners have enough time or money or services to render to stack some sats..

Not much receptivity for any message or request that king daddy allow you or any other low coiner or no coiner more time.. .. you can plea your case of good bitcoin morals and all that mumbo jumbo.. and you are not likely to get much if any sympathy.. including king daddy might decide to go into punishment mode.. which might be good.. but I have my doubts that  kind of uppity punishment even being very likely too..

In other words, there has been plenty of time to stack sats.. .. including the last year from the first correction down to $28.6k in May, June, July 2021.. and then now more time to stack sats that has gone on for most of 2022.. with an additional bonus stat stacking opportunity in the past 6 to 8 weeks.. you lucky sat stacking folks.. and if you do not have enough time or money to stack sats, those of us who are overly already prepared for up likely have not too much sympathy..

Sure, there is a bit of a self-interest from yours truly and from other BTC bag holders (not that I am feeling like I am holding bags--- it is just an expression).. ..

Anyhow.. time for UPpity.. even if such UPpity may well have a few more extra challenges and resistance points in the coming months.. and maybe even year.. who knows?
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 875
Merit: 1362
I found this which might be of interest:

“FAQ: Everything you need to know about forum 'activity, account ranks and merit“:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/faq-everything-you-need-to-know-about-forum-activity-account-ranks-and-merit-2766177
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
Just for the lulz I bought one Amazon share and 12 Ericsson A shares when I bought my certificates, it's gonna be fun to see how they perform compared to the bitcoin certificates.
copper member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1651
Bitcoin Bottom was at $15.4k
Who do you think is going to be the most accurate in terms of predicting halving date?  Roll Eyes

1. BuyBitcoinWorldwide - 2 April, 2024
2. Binance Academy - 30 April, 2024
3. Gate.io - 3 May, 2024
4. CoinGecko - 4 May, 2024
5. BitcoinBlockHalf - 4 May, 2024
6. Nicehash  - 31 May, 2024
7. CoinmarketCap - 1 June, 2024
8. CoinWarz - 3 June, 2024

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
I said 800 to 1100 as I knew it was close but maybe a bit off.

Thanks for correcting me.

I knew when I gave him 8 points he would have 1000 merits and sooner or later get the other activity numbers in.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 320
Take profit in BTC. Account PnL in BTC. BTC=money.
Well thanks gents. I’m not exactly a prolific poster, with multiple lengthy absences, so maybe it’ll take me a full ten years to get there!

I read the trigger was somewhere up to 1030 but you're still there so I think I was mislead.

strawbs currently has 814 activity.  Since he now has passed the merit threshold, his account is predestined to reach Legendary rank at an activity level known only to the administrators.  Some vague statements have been made about how this is actually calculated; I forgot what and where years ago, due to apathy.

Activity: the Legendary membergroup has no universal activity requirement.
You are guaranteed to become Legendary somewhere between 775 and 1030 activity,
but the exact point in this range at which you become Legendary is random per user.


Whoops.  Habit of just hammering “Post” in WO... eh.

[See further edits, for the lulz. — D.W.]

I think 800 to 1100 for activity picked at random

Cyrus, an Administrator, said 775 to 1030.  I have never seen anything to contradict that.  Where did you see 800 to 1100?



For those curious:  The exact level is based somehow on account metadata.  It is not picked at the time it happens; it is predestined, per-account.  AFAIK, the formula has never been revealed (and can’t be without ruining the surprise, unless it somehow depends on metadata known only to the administrators).

I do not recall where I have seen all this explained vaguely hinted at authoritatively, and am not inclined to spend time searching for it now.

theymos has this sense of humour. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
Well thanks gents. I’m not exactly a prolific poster, with multiple lengthy absences, so maybe it’ll take me a full ten years to get there!

I read the trigger was somewhere up to 1030 but you're still there so I think I was mislead.

strawbs currently has 814 activity.  Since he now has passed the merit threshold, his account is predestined to reach Legendary rank at an activity level known only to the administrators.  Some vague statements have been made about how this is actually calculated; I forgot what and where years ago, due to apathy.

Activity: the Legendary membergroup has no universal activity requirement.
You are guaranteed to become Legendary somewhere between 775 and 1030 activity,
but the exact point in this range at which you become Legendary is random per user.

I think 800 to 1100 for activity picked at random


Whoops.  Habit of just hammering “Post” in WO... eh.
Jump to: