Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 638. (Read 26519013 times)

full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 117

that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways

Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start...

With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo

Passing the Howey Test means the mETH will be qualified as a security, so that scammers like Vitalik will need to disclose the structures of the enterprise.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3038

that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways

Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start...

With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo

That's right and I basically agree - but replacing that puppet would be a strong electoral signal about a "change of policy".
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 4700
Addicted to HoDLing!

Everyone who ever merited this account should think twice about what they are doing with their lives, and know I will never really respect you.

I mean I'll try, but it will be hard.

Dammit merited twice over time…. But good to let us know if it’s an unhealthy account

 Yeah me too.  If only there were a way to flag/tag an account with some sort of trust indicator we could look at to prevent such things.

Me too. Once. He posted a beautiful haiku. It could have been AI-generated...

Many thanks to nutildah & Hueristic for letting us know. I wonder what he did...

Quite a few of us merited that haiku.

Is it wrong to merit a bot if its AI produces something beautiful?

That haiku was merit-worthy for sure. It's just that we merited the messenger (a merit whore, allegedly), not the poor AI that produced it.

Fool me once...
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard

that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways

Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start...

With mETH passing the howey test and getting an ETF approved anyways, we have seen that Blackrock / WS is moving the things, not Gensler ..imo
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 270
I think maybe because is near election season that is why the Biden team is bringing this approach in policy formulations, politicians always come up with strategies to help them win elections. President Biden knows the importance of the Bitcoin community, hence he has decided to come in with this approach.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Why is there so much noise here? i don't understand.

Because when you're not posting AI nonsense, you're just copy/pasting stuff from Twitter or news articles. Say something from your own brain and heart instead of out of the desire to accumulate merits. I'm certain you have at least 1 other account on this forum as you focus solely on exploiting the generosity of the loose merit givers here. We don't need more bots, we need original thinkers.

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3038

that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways

Removing Gensler would be a decent signal for a start...
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912

Promise of what, exactly?

Pure nonsense.

There is no more "policy" around Bitcoin that is needed nor required.

The idea that more "policy" marks the beginning of some kind of adoption is equally laughably stupid. Adoption has been with us for a very long time now.

 Promises not to dictate policy through executive order and dictatorial arms-length gov't organizations but rather to engage the "crypto" community to help develop policy. 
I agree we don't need more policy and I know you wont fall for that but there are many eligible (okay weak-minded) voters who will.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard

that's true also... let's see when they walk the walk ... they must at some point anyways
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5380

Promise of what, exactly?

Pure nonsense.

There is no more "policy" around Bitcoin that is needed nor required.

The idea that more "policy" marks the beginning of some kind of adoption is equally laughably stupid. Adoption has been with us for a very long time now.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 566
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
According to my maths IBIT now has more corn than GBTC, 288k vs 287k. Appears that GBTC has removed "The world's largest Bitcoin ETF" claim from their site too.

Edit: see that it's been already covered

BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) is the fastest to reach 20 Billion$ in asset size, only 137 days. Before that JEPI ETF was the only ETF to reach 20 Billion$ in asset size under 1000 days, JEPI took 985 days to reach that mark.

https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/2024-05-29-ibit-etf-nears-20-billion-asset-size-in-record-time-8755056985154  
https://x.com/RadarHits/status/1796126038864314467
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
legendary
Activity: 1235
Merit: 1202
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
Jump to: