Topic: WAVES - Complete Blockchain ecosystem for a token economy - page 290. (Read 131020 times)

The way of the platform is good! But unfortunately Ethereum in the plan so far stronger.
WAVES I propose to configure the product to eliminate all bugs and to dispose of the system to the maximum possible. Simplicity of use this attracts not only novices, but also professional users of the product.

Waves one of the first altcoins ever I ever bought and hold. But it never give me good profit  Marketing is unheard development is at turtle speed. Their only plus is safety. Sad to say I lost all my patiene.

Waves really has good underrated technology yet price doesn't catch its quality. Its very hard for me to understand Waves so. I am invested in it but I have lost confidence and trust. I wish I will be proven wrong.

Looks like OP is creating an ANN Thread design. I am a fan of Waves, I'll be back the next day if theres an update from the OP post. It must be a good news to Waves investors.

Hello, HiBorn!


Coinomat service is a separate project and and Waves partner. Waves Platform does not regulate any affairs connected to that service. All the questions related to Waves Platform can be answered on any Waves channels. Anyway, your question has been forwarded to the management, and you can get any information upon your request as soon as the answer from the management is received.

Best wishes,
Waves Community manager.

Waves remains hopeless if not for shielding questionable ICOs. A complete make over of the proposal may be required.

He said it in the article about Vostok. He said it's been 10 years since Bitcoin was created - why is it taking so long for a supposedly promising technology to gain traction? He was paraphrasing Bill Gates, the guy who stole the personal computer OS market that Gary Kildall had single-handedly created. In short, Gates bought a clone of CP/M and sold it to IBM while Kildall was still negotiating with them.

-

SIDENOTE (skip over for comments on Vostok)

When Kildall died, Gates used it as an opportunity for self-aggrandizement, saying that they were competitors, giving the impression that he won some mythical OS war. In fact, Microsoft at the time was a small software house making - mostly mediocre! - compilers and interpreters.

IBM initially visited Gates by mistake. Gates said, "I don't do operating systems - speak to Gary Kidall!" After Gates had bought the CP/M clone, he signed an agreement straightaway, saying, you just had to trust IBM, but the reason Kildall didn't sign straightaway was because he had an OS business to protect. Also, IBM had put obstacles in the way that were removed for Gates. Gates' mother knew the CEO of IBM, so that might have played a role, too, in Gates' success.

Later, Gates gave the impression that Kildall priced CP/M for the IBM PC at $240 vs $40 for DOS (the CP/M clone). But it was IBM who had done that - to kill it! Kildall could have sued IBM, but, instead, said that the market should decide, and IBM agreed to sell CP/M for the PC alongside DOS. Gates and IBM, effectively, conspired to destroy Kildall's firm. A decade or so later, Kildall went cap in hand to Gates, offering to sell his firm to Microsoft. Gates offered a paltry $10 million for it. Kildall later got over $100 million from Novell.

For the definitive account, get the paperback (NOT hardback) version of "They Made America" by Harold Evans. From that book: "But Kildall told him [Gerry Davis], 'Bill's a friend of mine. He wouldn't cut my throat'" Some friend!

Kildall wrote privately of Gates, "He is manipulative. He is a user. He has taken much from me and the industry."

Google "Gary Kildall and the 40th Anniversary of the Birth of the PC Operating System computerhistory"

Google "Gary Kildall and Collegial Entrepreneurship drdobbs" for an article in a well-known computer programming journal.

Search YT 4 "The Computer Chronicles: The Macintosh Computer (1985)" by user "Bob Blahloblaw"

Move slider to 14:23 and watch Kildall (he co-presented that program for six years) introduce GEM. GEM is what we would have got had Gates not stabbed a friend in the back. What Microsoft gave us:

Search YT 4 "Mum tries out Windows 1.0 (1985)" by user "OSFirstTimer"

-

Vostok is for SUPER WEALTHY INVESTORS ONLY using technology developed with money provided by Waves investors! So, the rest is simple inference. There is NOTHING stopping Sasha from later porting Waves over to Vostok and killing Waves.

No one with half a brain would trust the guy now. His job was to make Waves a success - NOT move on to another project - JUST HOW MUCH MONEY DOES HE WANT? But he has form in doing this.

As for Vostok - a completely separate project to Waves! - creating synergy: you might as well say every cryptocurrency out there gives Waves synergy, because they're all contributing to the development and uptake of blockchain technology. This is just a sop to gullible investors!


Well, it's what I read. I have no hard evidence - do you?