Pages:
Author

Topic: We can totally eradicate poverty if we TRULY want to. - page 3. (Read 1954 times)

full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
if you want to live not poor then you must be able to find a job and of course you must be able to fight hard because if you do not fight hard it will be very difficult to be rich.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 105
It is too ambitious to think of eradicating poverty. Why don't we start making one person's life better, just one person at a time.

Of course in order to overcome poverty a person must make an effort to earn money. Even in poor countries there are people who work hard and have a good condition.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Governments can reduce poverty rates by improving the quality of education, training skills for workers, or giving them the opportunity to get jobs such as bitcoin.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 100
So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.


Yes I am totally agree with you. There is a saying that Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime. If you want to help people then you do not need to give them a cash or things instead teach them on how to earn. Giving them a cash or things is consumble and they will look for you again to ask for it but if you teach them on how to work it is last for a long time.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 2
Giving money is only a short-term solution. A long-term solution needs to come from the government in form of better education, more opportunities etc.
member
Activity: 271
Merit: 10
No, I am against your point of view. The law of wealth distribution is not a known situation. In fact, the poor do need money very much. But if you give it money it will only continue to run out. You give him a job or an idea.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 501
It is too ambitious to think of eradicating poverty. Why don't we start making one person's life better, just one person at a time.
This is not an ambition to eliminate poverty of many people. I agree with OP that to eliminate poverty must start from yourself, you must have the desire to change your economy. that is the key. if you already have the intention and want to change it. then you must have the spirit to find jobs to get income and change your economy for the better
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 11
the awareness of sharing for the rich is very low compared to their wealth, they are never satisfied to hoard their wealth, they only look up not looking down, this causes the rich become richer and the poor become plentiful.
copper member
Activity: 141
Merit: 1
API-Based Smart Contract Solution For Exch Hacking
It is too ambitious to think of eradicating poverty. Why don't we start making one person's life better, just one person at a time.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Poverty can be lessen but not eradicated, It depends on the person how to handle it.

There is difference between giving money and giving business. For example; giving a specific person a money without knowledge in proper allocation will be spend  out for nothing.But if you give him a business with proper knowledge, that person will learn  to value the money knowning how to work for it and properly bugdet it.

-Giving money to the poor  is not the solution for them to become rich.
member
Activity: 714
Merit: 14
Poverty can be eradicated, no doubts about that. Firstly, to deal with poverty, it must be tackled from the psychological aspect. Poverty is a state of mind. What may seem poor to someone, may seem riches to another. We should learn to set realistic goals within our limits and learn to be content with what our efforts bring us.
On the other hand, poverty can be handled with the Blockchain technology. Most people are poor because of slowed business progress. Integrating Blockchain into a business brings an added sense of value to the business in the field of the payment systems. Once there is transparency and effective payment system (Blockchain offers this), there is likely going to be an increase in work productivity and increase in profit making margin.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.
Being rich is what we always dreamed of.If we were born poor we need to work hard inorder to achieve it.We also need the help of the community to grow and explore different strategy on where our luck comforts.Working hard and luck i think if it could be combined we can reach our goals and become more successful.
jr. member
Activity: 196
Merit: 1
Poverty is just a decision to everyone and it is their choice that they came up to that. Rich is born to that but poor people have a chance to be rich if we work hard, think of a way how to earn big income or start a small business.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 1
Giving money to the poor is one way to curb poverty. I believe we can't eradicate poverty by giving money to the poor alone. I think we need to have a positive mindset so we can find a better and a more practical way to eradicate poverty from the system.
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 500
So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.
Somehow it is better to be poor, because this kind of people can say what is humanity and which is the direction we shall take to create peaceful society.
full member
Activity: 593
Merit: 100
BBOD The Best Derivatives Exchange
No fool would use their money to give to others because of pity, everyone here is looking for profits not to distribute morality. You should remove this thought from the beginning because in this world can only be the hierarchy of the rich and the poor.
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 672
Totally eliminating poverty seems to be impossible, because once the majority of the people starts to climb the ladder you will see that the prices will start to go up, and it is not because of the rich being greedy but because it is part of the basics of supply and demand. Once a lot of poor people will become middle class they will start buying the things they don't usually buy which affects the demand on everything thus increasing the price. Totally eliminating poverty is not possible but the other alternative is we can ensure that people at the bottom of the hierarchy can get the basic needs they need like three meals a day and proper education.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 100
Giving money is a good way to help others but it may be helpful if the person who recieve that money use it to improve his or her life.  Always bear on our mind that when you always give money when you see the person on the street when you pass by  , you make them lazy because they will only rely on what you are giving. Instead you must do something to help them in other way not just by giving  money.
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245
All societies at all times tried to eliminate the poverty of people and no one has yet succeeded. Why did someone decide that this will succeed now? Because there was bitcoin? Will he feed the hungry? After all, with the help of Bitcoin, nothing material is created, which means that this is another illusion.
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 254
If everyone wants to be united to unify their vision and mission, surely it can. Cause to eradicate poverty, it's very important to increase one's human resources first, then create new jobs.
This must start on every individual and we should not depend on our government. Poverty is everywhere, educate people first and we will reach this kind of goal. Maybe cryptocurrency will help us to achieve it.
I concur, it seems very easy to say the governments need to be responsible for this but the truth is that if you want to reduce the level of poverty then each person needs to take responsibility and try to do something to improve their economic situation, and the best way to do this is with education of quality for everyone, that way more people will get out of poverty.
Pages:
Jump to: