Pages:
Author

Topic: We can totally eradicate poverty if we TRULY want to. - page 4. (Read 1897 times)

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1036
Through the help of the government and its people can poverty totally eradicate. By giving the poor people free education and livelihood projects and the people who received those benefits will study hard, to have a good job in the future and to become successful.
It is easier said than done. Poverty is not something that can easily be eradicated, if all the necessary things are not provided by the government, in terms of infrastructure, amenities and so on. All these are something that would bring about industrialization, there would indeed be more jobs, and people will always have a way to live a good life and enjoy most part of it without having to live in penury.

As long as all that is not provided, we will get to see some people getting limited in their space, but as long as people find somethings to do, it will help the economy as a whole to thrive and in a thriving economy, poverty level absolutely reduces.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Yeah, but that's only done at the community level. It means personal thought. If the activity of the cryptocurrency market creates a small fund for charity. That would be a plus for later steps of crypto.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
Poor people can easily be persuaded and controlled. They generally vote according to their ideology. Thus, governors are just giving empty promises and do nothing in order to destroy hunger and poverty until the next election. They find funny excuses for doing nothing for poor people and get their vote again. If poor people stop being behaving like a stupid kid and make reasonable decisions when voting, don't forget, and ask for what is promissed; they can eliminate liar politicians and be wealthier by time.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 118
right I agree with you there is indeed a social responsibility that we must fulfill to eradicate poverty. my religion also teaches that 2.5% of our salary belongs to the poor and we must give it. poverty is not only the responsibility of the government but all of us. if we routinely provide assistance, I am sure there will be no poor people. unfortunately most people are selfish they only think about themselves.
and we can also invite them to learn about cryptocurrency so that they can participate in the bounty or campaign project. so they can also get paid and escape poverty. but this requires patience and process.
It can also be called a struggle. Because, success cannot be achieved, in an instant way. There are no people who are suddenly successful. Surely they achieve success with effort that's not easy. If you want to be successful in the crypto world, you also need to add your insight and learn more. Even though all of that's not easy to do, but you have to believe that you can do it and can achieve success in the future.
full member
Activity: 493
Merit: 100
right I agree with you there is indeed a social responsibility that we must fulfill to eradicate poverty. my religion also teaches that 2.5% of our salary belongs to the poor and we must give it. poverty is not only the responsibility of the government but all of us. if we routinely provide assistance, I am sure there will be no poor people. unfortunately most people are selfish they only think about themselves.
and we can also invite them to learn about cryptocurrency so that they can participate in the bounty or campaign project. so they can also get paid and escape poverty. but this requires patience and process.
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 100
GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO
I think, the way to eradicate poverty is creating jobs for unemployment peoples. If peoples have a job, they have income and make economy run by consumption and investment.
copper member
Activity: 141
Merit: 1
API-Based Smart Contract Solution For Exch Hacking
There is no magic wand we can wave to eradicate poverty. the causes of poverty vary widely, and no simple solution will change it. It'll take decades to lift people out of poverty. The international community can help, providing aid and a fair market for goods from poor countries. Aid alone doesn't help, it has to be targeted towards trade, education, and other infrastructural projects. All this must be coordinated, designed by the developing countries themselves, and avoid the mistakes of the past where so-called 'experts' with little knowledge on the realities of poor countries prescribe poverty. Also, local leadership, vision, and transparency in poor countries is pivotal. If not, aid money will end up in European Banks, as has been the case in the past decades. my two cents.
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
Being close-mindedness for improvement and for better living is one of the reasons why poverty comes in. Just like some people who don't believe in cryptocurrencies is like missing the opportunity to change their lives into a better one.
Yes of course we can completely destroy poverty by helping those people who really need help but its better if the government should do something or do program that help many people to have a income. But its depend to someone that was help by government program because sometimes the problem is the people they helped. So I think we can escape from poverty if we want, since many livelihood programs are offering of government and there are so many rich people are also want to help them.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
╔►[FILIPINO Translator]◄╝
Being close-mindedness for improvement and for better living is one of the reasons why poverty comes in. Just like some people who don't believe in cryptocurrencies is like missing the opportunity to change their lives into a better one.
copper member
Activity: 672
Merit: 270
I do   believe  that  we can eradicate poverty  with  the  help of the  government that  they should educate poor  people  by teaching  them  financial  education  how to save  and how to   Invest   and that's  the key  to escape  poverty. 
Yes.It would help also.Maybe the government can offer livelihood projects to the poor and jobless people so they can have their own source of income to support their family needs.There are also elite people who can offer some opportunity jobs for the poor ones so that poverty will be reduced and hungry mouths will be already feed.
Yes of course we can completely destroy poverty by helping those people who really need help but still depend
hero member
Activity: 3052
Merit: 606
I do   believe  that  we can eradicate poverty  with  the  help of the  government that  they should educate poor  people  by teaching  them  financial  education  how to save  and how to   Invest   and that's  the key  to escape  poverty. 
Yes.It would help also.Maybe the government can offer livelihood projects to the poor and jobless people so they can have their own source of income to support their family needs.There are also elite people who can offer some opportunity jobs for the poor ones so that poverty will be reduced and hungry mouths will be already feed.
member
Activity: 395
Merit: 14
I do   believe  that  we can eradicate poverty  with  the  help of the  government that  they should educate poor  people  by teaching  them  financial  education  how to save  and how to   Invest   and that's  the key  to escape  poverty. 
Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 401
Ofcourse we can. Current poverty is quite a special case.
 I believe an automated poverty control system built on decentralized platform  and funded by users could reduce it (and dependency on governments/people) to its barest minimum. I prefer this method for reasons I don't want to go into.

The system should be able to manage users money algorithmically... Poverty sometimes is caused by people's poor management of money.

There should be a way to guarantee sustainable jobs, sustainable salary and sustainable unemployment/underemployment benefits. I think this stuff would be best handled on automated,  decentralized and self-sustaining system.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1055
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Beggars on the streets do not guarantee that they are poor people, because there are many news circulating that reveal that if beggars are not 100% poor, to empower street children or street people it has indeed been implemented by the government in my country which eventually they will be fostered to have expertise specifically that will make it creative by having a job. If it is easy to channel funds to the poor, you can directly visit their home or residence directly, so that the donation fund is guaranteed to be 100% right and far from corruption.
full member
Activity: 759
Merit: 105
So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.
I think the best way to eliminate poverty is to help them with their knowledge or support them. Because only giving them money will only help them a day or a few days if we help them a job they will live a few more years. This is just my personal opinion
As what Gabali126 said, we should teach the poor on how to fish instead of giving them the fish that we caught. The main point of it is that they will only live for a day because you just gave them a fish but if you teach them how to fish they will live for a long time and not just one day.
So, education is the most important key for a success of a person and their dedication on how to learn.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 264
"STAY IN THE DARK"
Too true! Many impoverish people in the community are actually the most hard working people in that communit. All they lack is the opportunity to earn more that what they have. Maybe it is because of lack of education or seed money but the fact of the matter is they don't need hand outs, they need opportunities.
Well, life generally is not about hard work, and it is all about being smart. Absolutely, for a country that is ridden with poverty, it is usual to always notice there is always a problem from the leadership, the level of corruption in such country and the unavailability of things that are necessary for the citizens to thrive and succeed and in such kind of settlement, it is always hard to say eradicating poverty would be easy unless a lot of changes are made most especially with such leadership.

Poverty is present everywhere. You can meet people living under the bridge even in New-York, and they are not necessarily unlucky with their whole lives. Corruption is also omnipresent, and it looks like you can't eradicate poverty (or alleviate it substantially) with the help of those who facilitated it in the first place ("the leadership"). The implication is that we should first eradicate corruption, but this is even less possible than eradicating poverty, even though it is something less vague and more concrete.

IIRC that's the exact course of action that Singapore took, which eventually led this country to become ranked with the 3rd highest GDP per capita.
In singapore that is possible because of the good political leaders and very few population rates so they made such a huge growth in very short term but even in Singapore there will be poor people/In country like China or USA where population is very high and much parts were corrupted in government side so even if we want to make measures to avoid the poor it will not be completely possible.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1049
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


have you seen youtube videos where people pretend to be homeless yet int he end of the day they actually drive a car and live in an apartment? you can imagine how much of them will pretend to be when some billionaires roaming to give them something.

philippines is where i'm form, this country has no winter, the plants grow all year. its surrounded with waters that anyone can fish. everyone here should be able to get food for themselves but with corrupt government we all lose opportunity. its the government that should be fixing themselves first before it can serve its people.
member
Activity: 255
Merit: 10
So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.
I think the best way to eliminate poverty is to help them with their knowledge or support them. Because only giving them money will only help them a day or a few days if we help them a job they will live a few more years. This is just my personal opinion
jr. member
Activity: 116
Merit: 1
We have more than enough resources to spread around the world and totally eliminate poverty.  The problem is there are a lot of billionaires that are just too selfish to share anything.
full member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 180
Chainjoes.com
No one in any country has been able to completely eradicate poverty. The eradication of poverty was also one of the main slogans of the socialist countries. We see what came of it. In fact, the collapse of the socialist system. It is unlikely that anyone will succeed in the near future. It should also be borne in mind that some people themselves tend to be in poverty and, in this way, they believe they gain complete freedom. This is their philosophy of life.
Pages:
Jump to: