Just an idea.
What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?
But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.
Statistically speaking, each participant would win the same number of times if the campaign were to run long enough (i.e. several years, presumably in order to get as many 16-week cycles as possible). For the average earnings, it would therefore not matter whether you receive the entire amount once every 16 weeks or a partial amount once a week.
With highly fluctuating assets such as Bitcoin, however, I see this as problematic in that the payout of week 1 will be significantly higher or significantly lower than the payout of week 16. You only need to look at the Bitcoin price 16 weeks ago. So the participants receive a different amount of payment in Bitcoin, even if the USD value is the same (a fixed BTC amount of course shifts the problem to someone receiving more/less USD).
For you as a BM, there is also a very good chance that someone will leave the campaign after winning. Statistically, the chances of winning more than once every 16 weeks are quite low
Personally, I wouldn't be a fan of this at all, I like the weekly BTC receipt much better!
