Topic: What do you want to see in casino reviews? - page 20. (Read 4849 times)

As a reviewer I can probably say that when a casino has some features then testing those features and writing them in the review is the responsibility of the reviewer. I also try to test the weak points of a casino and try my best to recommend the casino owner to fix those weak points in order to succeed in casino business.

All of the casinos are there to satisfy their players and they do that in order to earn money for them as well, and if a casino lacks customer support or any other features then it's responsibility of the reviewer to highlight that issue in the review so casino can fix that issue and players will get some knowledge about that issue before going with that casino.

Casino review should be an eye opener about the casino in particular. Many things needed to be known about a casino through review and not just praising the casino of it wonderful features and characteristics that makes it different from others in same competition.
There is competition in casino business that we as future users would want to see some certain things about the casino that would give us an edge over the ones we are using presently with good and interesting features.

All review websites, not just casinos, currently lack the trust of their readers. Because, we all know, many companies use review websites that pay influencers or fake accounts to provide positive reviews of a company. However, sometimes even though they are paid, influencers provide neutral reviews of the company, they can even provide critical reviews, this is actually good, because it will be more organic. If everyone gives positive reviews, it seems hard to believe. However, that doesn't mean I'm against reviews. The Bitcointalk forum is a place for me to see organic reviews of new casinos that join the forum and more trusted since review from users is real, even we can find some of paid review, many criticized given by members, that why here I can find a realistic reviews from every companies.

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

it's obvious that if casino will play their players or any random people to review their casino then they will write good review of them.
so we cannot trust those review but here on bitcointalk gamblingbro have their website: gamblingbro.com
they have tested mostly reputable casinos by depositing and withdrawing real money/crypto. also there is a review campaign where we get $5 for a review on their site.
there are many reviews are written by BTT users so i think we can trust those review because they didn't written because of pressure, check the thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/write-a-short-crypto-casino-feedback-paying-5-directly-to-your-btc-wallet-5382433

When you see any paid gambling casino reviews campaigns then it is obvious that most people will give good reviews, why ? Because they have taken money from the gambling site and they will intentionally prepare a good review. Even in some cases, if they are paid after the review submission, then this makes it even more biased review as the reviewers will give good reviews with the fear that if they say bad things about the casino, the casino may not pay them. So, i am not in favour of casino paid reviews to act as a judgement if the gambling site is trustworthy or not.

I would rather like to know about the real views and reviews about the gambling sites and whether they are worth playing or not, but such real views will only come when someone is not paid to review but he gives review about how he felt while being on the gambling site and how was his experience. It could be good or bad or even a mixture of both where he likes some features of the gambling site and appreciates them and at the same time, he may dislike some features and propose for some modifications.

I won't agree with you guys, what you are seeing on the review sites might truly represent the user's experience, it might be that the situation is so ugly which is why you see too many bad reviews rather than positive ones. Fine, there are many people who would have a good user experience with their casinos but will not bother to review them, but don't you believe that the same thing will happen when some of them have a bad user experience as well? Some will not also bother to review it if the case is minimal, and some will not even review a casino bad in terms of money stolen if the money is not too much.

Besides, if you would be fair enough, when you read at least 50 reviews from people about a casino, some must be positive and others could be negative. Not that all will be negative. If the casino is fair and good enough, there is no way they will still not score at least 3/5 on average review for people to be judgemental after reading the review, which is good enough especially when the person reading the review is also enjoying the company if using them. But let me warn you, if you read too many negative reviews about a casino, particularly the issue of withdrawal, I advise you to flee for your money and not say that people are too cruel. Cruelty or not if it is getting much, it means something is fishy and you can't trust such a casino with your money. Or else, you will soon be another victim if you are good with gambling and withdraw frequently or have big money to withdraw at once.

actually those reviews are directly towards us gamblers to assess , and also this is the way
that we can evaluate the attitude of the said casino site if they will give consent in fake reviews or they
will stick to the plan to only entertain and pay those who have valid reviews that honest and legit?

lets give the company the benefits of the doubt ,because their business is at stake here and
if they will not act towards honesty then they will suffer in the future because players nowadays are smart
and knows what is going on and what is happening .

No gambling site would run a review campaign reading negative comments from reviewers. Maybe those that are constructive criticisms could be acceptable, but anything that are destroying the reputation of the business is not good. Although it might not be written in the rules but it's already understood that once you are hired, your review must have content that will help the company to grow.

I think this is the only very brave website that despite knowing they have a bad reputation in the forum, probably outside too, they still run an honest review campain .

1xbit.com honest review campaign (open) ^{(This is closed now, but thread wasn't updated)}

there are also issues with casinos creating paid review campaigns. I don't think it's bad, but there will be more participants who don't actually speak the truth and only leave positive reviews regarding casinos to get paid.
although I'm sure not all review campaign participants are like that, there will still be more of them who review the good without seeing the shortcomings of the casino. but I'm sure the intended review campaign certainly wants to get more input and suggestions from casino users. whether it's paid or not. The most important thing is that all participants can speak honestly.

Well, of course, where else could there be problems, such as when withdrawing money? It seems to me that this is the main problem. However, scammers have reached a high level and are excellent at copying gaming sites. At first everything is great and the person doesn’t notice anything, but then a real nightmare begins when it comes to money. This story is as old as this world. Nothing new, in principle. In most cases, the methods simply do not change, but are only improved and slightly modified.

Nowadays, people are too lazy to skip the little things like double checking, which results in later consequences. A person who can be alert online can keep himself away from any impending danger.

There are many agencies online who are earning huge amount of money by providing different types of fake reviews, so it is conceivable that these fake reviews are in high demand in the market. So gamblers have to be most careful to keep themselves free from such promotions.

This is why on the time that we do have some doubts into those reviews then it would be always recommended that you should really be that making those in depth research
if those feedbacks were real or fake. We do know that in todays world or online on which everything could be faked just as long they would really be able to hook up players to
deposit into such site. This is why we should really be that careful on believing into things. It doesnt really cost up that much if we do speak about
having some research. It is really just that the main reason on why people go into trouble is that they are really just that too lazy on doing things
on which it is really that something not too hard to be done.

It's true that there's a way all these reviews we see online, some were being manipulated, but we must not because of that draw our own conclusion on them all, there are some that make use of various and different means to make their own reviews look more attractive to observers online, after going through these reviews, we can still maintain the other recognitions of alternative means to clear our doubts by making additional research on them before concluding.

Well, the sites that are like the casinos each person has a way of seeing things and criticizing them, there are many ways of looking at it, according to tastes because each one has their own way of deciding if they like a site or not, epro has to be a bit more general to see everything that is presented, for example the things that occur in casinos with the games are very different, I personally always like to play slots, and I always look for the function that comes with poker, as well I can't review what roulette is like, how they have the crash game, something like that, something that entertains me, but basically on the platforms what I'm looking for is to have sports bets to see if I can win there, of course that's my way. If you see it, then many times go back to the thread again, see the casino reviewers, they are what we can interpret as a very valid option to make a judgment about a site, in the event that it is not like that then things can simply be change for the better, I could say that when it comes to new casinos, I have to be very careful, especially when making deposits, because we do not see the intentions they have, so they are things that are there to be considered .

In other aspects, I could see that there are no casinos that have the options to play in pvp mode, especially for playing poker tournaments, this is something that can be reactivated so that it can generate much more people on the platform, clearly, it is considered That when there are many options like these, you have to take for granted that the best are the oldest sites, I could say that the best casino in the world is stake.com, I think that the experts and the reviewers can agree on that, I also speak well of bitcasino.io because it is a casino that I see is very familiar and I like to play slots there, but everyone has their preferences regarding the games they like, maybe the atmosphere in other casinos they like more, but I always play it safe.

I totally get what you mean about forum thoughts vs. general reviews. First up, forum chatter's like real talk, you know? People spill the beans on real life events, not just old TOS material. Thats gold for anyone trying to find their way around a casino.

Secondly, review sites need to do better. We need the real story, not just the highlights. How about tests of real play? Yes, its a big job, but thats what makes a review site unique. Also, dont forget the power of community intelligence - forums are full of it!

A big "YES" to showing how users have dealt with disputes, withdrawals, and all that other stuff. The important thing is not how flashy a site looks, but what it does. Also, encouraging good gaming habits is very important.

I don`t ready to search the real review site - it costs me money and time. Today i prefer to make research in the casinos threads here. Of course there are some paid feedback, but the result is much more truly than i get visiting review sites.
We need some other motivation to reviewers, except the referral links and payment from casino.

And livingfree expressed this idea. But you and I at BTT are smart enough to double-check the information. The average user/gambler will base their choice on the results of their Google search. He will see only positive reviews in such a sample; he will not conduct a more in-depth research of information.

Lots of gambling disputes have been solved in this forum and people are most thankful for the gambling assistance gotten in bitcointalk. Any member who began reading reviews on the forum wouldn't look out for other review sites, which may delay their complaints or research on a specific casino. The responses in the forum are quite a wide range and members are vast in terms of gambling-related discussions. Review sites only provide some specific information which makes it easier for a reader to understand a casino's TOS. But, I noticed that most review writers don't check the casinos and play games there to make better feedback like how long withdrawal takes and the possibilities of winning on the casino. They only write based on what is written in the casino's terms of service. Which doesn't make review sites interesting than what we could get in the forum. Members who talk about a specific casino, have used it, know its flaws and downside, how long it takes for the term to send a withdrawal, etc. Readers can also read about the previous issues the casino had, and if the gambler's money was later on resolved.

Most of these complaints and inner disputes can't be found on review sites, hence Op could use the opportunity to add on his review sites the functional aspect of the casino. If he's not ready to try out all the casinos before writing a review, then he can check in the forum or other review sites with a discussion page available to know users' complaints on the specific casino. What could lead to a person's money being seized and all that is what attracts readers to a review site, because it's the common problem in most casinos? Hardly have I seen a casino review site, offering in-depth research on a casino, what is all over the site is the outer sketch of the casino. Whether it's been active for long or not, the withdrawal method, customer service, etc. One can use the casino's TOS page to gain better information than what the review writer has on his page. Which shouldn't have been, like that.

Bitcointalk is not known by every casino review website, except sites already on bitcointalk. there are huge number of review sites, that do not know about bitcointalk so it will be not possible.
also people who post review on those websites are bigger than all active users of bitcointalk. sites like askgambler, casino.org, etc. these sites always rank on first page of google so most users check review of those sites.
and there the number of scam accusation is bigger than bitcointalk.
there is a thread to see unresolved accusation and those, which got resolved after being posted. check here if you don't know: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1-ratings-of-bitcoin-sportsbooks-since-2014-kyc-rankings-bonuses-scam-accus-717790