I generally believe investors. Because they are way more experienced than us . So i am looking icos and i investigating detailly their investors. For example pantera capital zhenfund etc.
They are strong investor companies and if they invested in these icos i can believe that ico is not a scam. Yes maybe that can not be good roi in future. But at least i can understand from here about scammy issue.
Please always check that information always both side. Enter investors website and check that project from there also.
Topic: What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty (Read 882 times)
We all want to participate in good projects to get more bonuses. Although the members of the bonus do not invest money into the project and do not buy the cards. Please study the project before joining.
First, I always look at the representative on the forum , and then pay attention to the site , the team and the road map.
every aspect will be important to analyze projects let alone amid the multitude of scam happens. The team, whitepaper, the site will be the source of the information should at least be known will find a project that is indeed appropriate and produces. Manager and even social media are always on will give you a good overview of the project they are working on.
There are no best criteria to judge a good bounty. Ideally, you should do your homework before joining any bounty but you still need some element of luck to ensure that you have not wasted your time to acquire tokens that won't be worth what you thought it would be.
Also many bounties nowadays are delaying payments for long.
Also many bounties nowadays are delaying payments for long.
If you want to judge the good bounty first check the idea secondly check the resume of team member,white paper and road map of the bounty. These things help you to select good bounty.
Yes you are right, those heavy investors should check the developers before investing a huge amount of coins in order to determine if it was a legitimate campaign or not.
those things cant guarantee you that a bounty is legit because nowadays it is really possible to fake those info' and other important details . any one can copy paste or create a fake dummy accounts and profiles online .
So overall id say there is no best criteria to judge a good bounty because it'll all depends on your luck . choosing a bounty is no difference than playing a gambling , you can mostly loose and can rarely won the game .
So goodluck for chosing this journey .
The development team of the ICO is the main key to the success of the bounty you are working on.
If you understand the development team like the advisor, Vitalik Buterin, I'm sure the ICO will be successful until listing on the Exchange.
If you understand the development team like the advisor, Vitalik Buterin, I'm sure the ICO will be successful until listing on the Exchange.
Yes in white paper all details have been described and you can judge about that bounty by researching white paper but I am selecting bounty just like I am investing ICO. For that purpose I check also their social media accounts like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Telegram and Reddit. I check How much followers of that project in this social media accounts, more followers mean more people interested in that project so its good. Other point is I check who managing that bounty mean I check about bounty manager trust level. And Last one how much tokens they allocated for bounty , it should not above 3-4%.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
Yes, the whitepaper can be used as a general description of an ICO project. Next, I see the project from their product. Because I think the success of the project and the price of their tokens one of them is determined by the products they create for the future. 
Not everything "convincing" is a winner, that is for sure. You can get tons and tons of whitepaper, websites that can rock and information that is as impressive as the U.S. constitution but all of this boils down to the players and makers of the said company. We can never tell what their personalities are, what their attitudes and things they like and dislike in general but everything boils down to them. One wrong move and your millions will go directly to the dust bin.
Check the comment regarding this bounty in this forum.
To check their ideas and goals.
To choose a bounty, first of all you need to choose a project.If the project is worthy and unique-then the bounty will be held at the highest level.That usually happens.
It's almost impossible to know a good bounty from the beginning,but there are measures to take in order to be at least 60% sure it's a good bounty;going through the white paper thoroughly,campaign managers is also another way to get good bounties,managers such as amazix always provide perfect bounties,you should also look out for the management team,bounty managers e.t.c
In my own opinion, campaign manager is the very first factor that we need to consider in looking for a legit and profitable ICO. We must conduct a thorough research of their background to check if they are that Professional to manage a campaign.
Dear friend,
What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty? This is a exciting question. Yeah, I have some criterias for choosing bounty campaigns. Such as, the pool serve for, developing team, managed team, the market located, the objects reach to.
What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty? This is a exciting question. Yeah, I have some criterias for choosing bounty campaigns. Such as, the pool serve for, developing team, managed team, the market located, the objects reach to.
Yes I believe you are correct, most of the hunters judge how good a bounty is by looking at the people who manage it but for me the vision and goal of the bounty is much more better. I see a lot of ICO becoming successful even though it was handle but someone who is not famous managers. I believe that reading the whitepaper and roadmap should be the basis in judging a ICO.
There are many ways to judge a good bounty, like, reading its whitepaper. You can see all the detailed information regarding on the tokensale and its token by reading its whitepaper. You can extensively verify also the team composition if the team is strong or not.
i usually check out the ico team first and see if they are active and promote the project at live events. if they do that, its a plus for the bountie. of course this is not the only thing that makes a good ico and bountie, but it is a point to watch out for.
The best criterion for choosing a bounty campaign is, you should evaluate the product they produced first. Check their white papers and developer as well as the team. And then analyze everything.
Jump to: