Topic: What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty - page 3. (Read 884 times)
If you want to judge the good bounty first check the idea secondly check the resume of team member,white paper and road map of the bounty. These things help you to select good bounty.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
It goes just beyond that, even if a project have large community which is mostly inflated by airdrop participants. They project might still fail.
You need to do some research about the authenticity of the project and then go ahead to do some basic plus and minus (research) to know how much the team allocate for the bounty campaign.
some of this campaign even if they are real, allocate pennies for their campaign and you wouldn't want to work for the long period of time only to receive penny at the end of the period.
The most important for me is the idea and the vision behind the project, for what a problem is it a solution for.
After that looking at the team is it experienced enough to fulfil the goals of the project. After that looking to the
social and marketing aspects.
After that looking at the team is it experienced enough to fulfil the goals of the project. After that looking to the
social and marketing aspects.
For my few knowledge about bounty projects the best criteria to judge a particular bounty are those person behind the project. For me not all large number of community on a some projects is only basis to determine if it has a poor chances you to become successful. Because sometimes the more developers the great project is always there and aslo having a real platforms and whitepapers with a purpose is one of the good basis of bounty project.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
when I join a gift, the criteria that I put forward the most is a project that really runs in the world. for example bank-based projects etc.
We have to base in their undertaking like in the event that they can go extremely prominent here in crypto so case of it currently are trade.io and eo.trade obviously even they not advance here in gathering I figure they will swing great to a well known exchanging site in light of their stage and a considerable measure of genuine users,traders and speculators will utilize this something else we can depend to the designer like on the off chance that they officially here in crypto and know as a useful for crypto or they effectively mainstream here obviously in the event that he/she run a crusade here in crypto obviously that is useful for each users,traders and financial specialists
in my opinion, a good bounty to follow is a bounty that has a large big allocation because with that the bounty hunters will get the satisfactory results. other than that a good bounty is a bounty that has tokens or coins with high prices. usually, a lot of projects have coins and the price when sold the price is below in ico
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
bounty hunter team certainly not paying attention to the wrong things. with an experienced team, it will make a project can walk well and smoothly. even the usual project alone will be wonderful when handled by a team of top-quality indeed. However, it is also a whitepaper content from a concept in critical limits stretcher by the team and this will complement each other.
My principle is to see the feasibility of the project, and the power behind the project. I am referring to the partner. A good project will have many big companies to support them. Such a project will make you make a lot of money.
I think it's the most intuitive way to see if a community of projects is huge. For the choice of bounty, because you don't have the time to browse every bounty website or read the white paper for each project, but the community number of members is what you can see at a glance.
The best criteria to judge that the bounty is good or not can be seen from:
a. The bounty manager (see the rank and trac record)
b. Token allocation and percentage for each campaign
c. The ICO to be promoted has reached the softcap
d. It promotes the ICO with the ready products
a. The bounty manager (see the rank and trac record)
b. Token allocation and percentage for each campaign
c. The ICO to be promoted has reached the softcap
d. It promotes the ICO with the ready products
The white paper is undoubtedly an important document we can judge the project, and it is also worth evaluating the website and the team, which is also an important part of the success of the project. Of course, popularity is also an important factor for the success of this project.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
Definitely Yes,we should check all social media for the ICO project to join. It is one of the assurance that the ICO is not scam and have a good platforms. The community members always follow if the ICO is clearly stated in their website. This is an important keys on how to join a successful investment.
The most important thing to look at when choosing an ICO is the team and the project. If the project is promising and there is probably already a finished product, then it remains only to see what the development team is working on it. It is worth investing in such ICO, although it is still necessary to invest in them only in the long term, for at least 2 years.
I basically look into the crypto arena based on the quality of the project they have and the product they intend to offer the market, without a quality product, the project is as good as failed as this is the sole marketing source. Then look at the development team of the project, a competent development team experienced enough to come up with a good project suitable of the market is also a key factor
I think there are two criterias that point that bounty is good - reached soft cap and working minimum viable product
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
I think that is a risk, as well as investing. that's why every ico project has a considerable level of risk compared to investing in an altcoin that has entered the exchange. so, the conclusion
every ico campaign that you will follow must be studied first like when you want to try investing
everyone has its own assessment aspects. many are judging from the team but also a whitepaper is a must to note is also to be able to determine a generating bounty. When more and more analysis of the team, the whitepaper, the website certainly provide enough good results also for the profit that could be obtained.
Look at financial terms and conditions of the project. If it is no scam project team will return funds to contributors in case of soft cap failure.
I always prefer working with some set of managers, such amazix, because i cannot cope with the stress of doing thorough research on a project and at the end, it fails. Since some of these managers have successfully managed projects, i just do little findings on their projects and join.
Yes, the bounty manager in this case is important because it bridges good relations with the project development team. The first one I checked to participate in the gift was the bounty manager, then checked the white paper and the development team, then made comparisons from various rating sites, and did not forget to check the team's activities on various social media. Jump to: