Topic: What is the best criteria to judge a good bounty - page 8. (Read 968 times)
It is very difficult to choose, and it makes it a lottery. Half of the projects do not have the right teams nor partners and are set to be a failure from the start.
Well it would be hard these days to justify a good bounty even the ones being run by high profile members in this great community these days can be scam. But the few factors that i always look for before participating in any bounty campaign is the idea behind the project is it achievable and are their goals realistic. These days so many projects want to do things that is not practical. Another thing is to look at the team members who have been shown as team members and check out their individual profile whether they are actually involved in the project sometimes the team members can be fake. Tread carefully and i am sure you will do good in this community.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
Yes, you should check projects website and also developers page, devs should have real names and their photos, project should have a supporting community ,stage of the the project is also important ,the idea behind the project is an important key for successful investments.
I think that the most important thing to judge the bounty is to check the resume of the main members of the team. The second is to check the activity of the community and then check the feasibility of the white paper. I think these three points are indispensable.
I think the team members is one of the most important thing, I'll be more concerned about the degree of team, because only an excellent team can make the development of the project is more outstanding, so our tokens, worthwhile.
I totally agree with you. However, team members play an important role in the project's prospects. They can have good connections for example.
Even if the project has enough followers, so it might be a scam, so most of the time I will eradicate the development progress of the project to determine the project, however this is not all judgment standard.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
Normally you can find the white paper in the ICO link of the website itself mate but along with that you can find the technical paper also in the the website bro. Those project you can able to analyze it easily how the technically it can go correct.
Please review about the ICO projects with the team information, from which manager handing the bounty program and finally who are all in developer team that is what you need to look on it mate.
Sometimes a project may have all that you have stated, good team, a whitepaper, a secured website but will still fail at the end. These features are good to consider though, but the idea behind the project is also important. Is the idea really good? Do you think people and other investors will be interested? These are some questions I do ask myself.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
A good bounty is any bounty that is not a scam. This is not something new. A lot of projects fail because of a very bad project or it could also be a scam. All those things that you said could be an indicator of a good or bad bounty. You really have to be very careful.
A large number of subscribers on Twitter or telegram does not provide any advantage. The idea of the project is much more important. Of course, it is important that the accounts of developers were not fake. Participation of the team in summits and conferences will be a good indicator
So, to judge whether the reward thread is good or bad is to judge whether the ICO project is good or bad.
More attention should be paid to open source.
More attention should be paid to open source.
The current scenario after the crowd sale only find the right project because white paper, Road map and developing team all are good but project worth is important thing in this scenario because they have some criteria once it will reach the expected sale this will continue in market. So bounty is hard to predict in this scenario.
if you're talking about specifically judging bounties, you could try and check the bounty manager's history. is it a completely new person? is he from the project itself?
so many bounties seem to be based on nothing but 'good words' and eventually never pay out.
if you're joining a bounty that's been going for at least a week, check the spreadsheets, ensure that someone is keeping track and updating it regularly.
but if you mean generally how to determine if the project is good, you can look in this thread
so many bounties seem to be based on nothing but 'good words' and eventually never pay out.
if you're joining a bounty that's been going for at least a week, check the spreadsheets, ensure that someone is keeping track and updating it regularly.
but if you mean generally how to determine if the project is good, you can look in this thread
In this thread, there was a topic of how the members of the projects turned out to be false, here's the proof that you need to analyze the project completely.
First Of All You need to research about that bounty project and their team and second see their roadmap total coin supply and all then choose their bounty. It is help you to choose good bounties.
All of you correctly do, and it's necessary to work in this sphere. But the team of the project - is his representing person, you will look through unwillingly who is developers of this or that projects. And in general it is necessary to pay attention to the road map of the project, design of the website, white paper, a platform essence.
While some bounty hunters lay more emphasis on the community members of the project. I tend to look at the technical aspect of the Whitepaper, website structure and team because I have seen a lot of projects with large communities failed.
Jump to: