To know the future of Bitcoin you should start by looking at the past of Bitcoin.
Disagree. The past of bitcoin wasn't so epic because it can't consist epicness right after launch but after all this years BTC community got bigger and getting bigger everyday so that's why the future of bitcoin is not the similar to the past of bitcoin. 
Topic: What is the Future of Bitcoin ? - page 67. (Read 76854 times)
To know the future of Bitcoin you should start by looking at the past of Bitcoin. TLDR that whole article but seems they were comparing Bitcoin to Fiat. Fact of the matter is when I'm around people they are holding online devices and carrying them around This is a new trend which leads me to believe that the failing fiat model has very real competition to say the least.
the problem is the people ... well, if gov. freeze or steal money on bank account in Europe (France, UK, Germany) at the 2015, it's not a problem.
It's a revolution.
It's a revolution.
I think that bitcoin is a part of the peer to peer revolution, so it is really a part of something larger than itself....
Umm, I really don't know what the future holds for bitcoin, and highly doubt that it will topple all banks or replace FIAT currencies altogether. But I do think it's probable that it finds its niche or application where it may surpass our wildest dreams, still!
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
You are tied with the legacy thinking. Bitcoin is different from that. Please have your time to read Satoshi's paper. The basis of Bitcoin is it is trustless as it is open source and community driven. Trust is something tied with centralized systems.
Bitcoin is the future of money precisely because there is NO trust involved whatsoever. Bitcoin is the atheism of money, that's why it will destroy all competition.
1 Satoshi will be 100$ in 5-10 years!
And those $100 will be nothing if that big bubble price of lots of crazy manufatured dollars just pop.
I'll be happy if 1 Satoshi become 1 USD. I'll become a millionaire with my 1BTC
1 Satoshi will be 100$ in 5-10 years!
And those $100 will be nothing if that big bubble price of lots of crazy manufatured dollars just pop.
I'll be happy if 1 Satoshi become 1 USD. I'll become a millionaire with my 1BTC
you can't trade with a 10 minute confirmation transaction.
and that, it's very good for people.
and that, it's very good for people.
I agree, you need more time to evaluate all possibilites and have recourse if something goes wrong, for instance the wares disappears in transit or there is something wrong with the product. Six months should do it, that is why we have credit cards.
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
You are tied with the legacy thinking. Bitcoin is different from that. Please have your time to read Satoshi's paper. The basis of Bitcoin is it is trustless as it is open source and community driven. Trust is something tied with centralized systems.
Community driven means nodes are run by Bitcoin community. Those are machine running an open source software. When u interact with tha machine ...do u need to trust ? Trust is for human, not machine.
So, the future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc. Actually this means "trust". future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
You are tied with the legacy thinking. Bitcoin is different from that. Please have your time to read Satoshi's paper. The basis of Bitcoin is it is trustless as it is open source and community driven. Trust is something tied with centralized systems.
Community driven means nodes are run by Bitcoin community. Those are machine running an open source software. When u interact with tha machine ...do u need to trust ? Trust is for human, not machine.
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
You are tied with the legacy thinking. Bitcoin is different from that. Please have your time to read Satoshi's paper. The basis of Bitcoin is it is trustless as it is open source and community driven. Trust is something tied with centralized systems.
Actually in the paper it is a different "trust". It is about the performing the transaction directly, without the "trust", without the mediation. future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
You are tied with the legacy thinking. Bitcoin is different from that. Please have your time to read Satoshi's paper. The basis of Bitcoin is it is trustless as it is open source and community driven. Trust is something tied with centralized systems.
I think Bitcoin will continue to explode, there will probably be a few setbacks somewhere along the line, but I am fairly certain it will continue to grow.
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
Your logic is applicable for centralized currencies. A de-centralized currency does not need trust. U dont need to trust Satoshi to use Bitcoin. U can see the code yourself.
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
future of bitcoin is paying for everything with bitcoins, everyday grocery etc
So, actually this means "trust".What the hell? How did you correlate what he wrote with "trust" ? If you had to sum it up it's "usage"
I think the future of BTC as such is today. Without radical transformations and ecosystem development BTC has no future. If it will be transformed - it will not be the present BTC.
1 Satoshi will be 100$ in 5-10 years!
Jump to: