Topic: What thing you much check before investing in an ICO? - page 2. (Read 1367 times)
maybe what I will see when I want to invest in IO usually I will look like a team, a whitepaper and I see the linkedin they have, because I want to make sure that person is responsible and does not run away from carrying ICO funds.
Thing i look into most is team, solid team is required, no fake member, must have above 10 full time team members. Second thing is whitepaper, then their research report, activities, and support community.
Yes I very much agree with the existence of a great team that can make the performance of the development project will run good. other than that I think look at the concept and realization of the project are probably realized or only as an idea. 
Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
For this year I chose to invest in something else, than I know ICO rating sites are paid to promote ICO, so ICO rating sites play less role in seeing ICO's success, from my experience, I am more inclined to see partners who are cooperated by the ICO, you know someone who is truly an expert and can attract investors to invest, then regarding the concepts and tokens in the WP is number 2 for me. When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
Thing i look into most is team, solid team is required, no fake member, must have above 10 full time team members. Second thing is whitepaper, then their research report, activities, and support community.
As of now, there are so much fraud ICO's. I think in participating into ICO's you should first check their project plans, whitepaper, and website. If you want to assure a successful ICO, check if their project reached ita soft cap so that it would be great to invest on their ICO.
Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
the site rating does not provide an objective appraisal, so it goes a good way of selecting the ICO. most of the sites of the sort only a judgment that is contrived. analysis of its own view of the background and goals of the team concept will be able to determine the feasibility of the ICO. When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
In my opinion, icorating and any other ico site can be trusted but it is not enough for research of our investment. Generally, before investing in any ico projects, I check whitepaper, projects team, community activities, supply and demand. I think the high rating is not a guarantee that ico is promising.
Investing to an ICO is no longer looks profitable for me. If they will be unable to reach their softcap, they will no longer continue the project or worst is that you will be scammed. Another bad news is that if they decided to refund the investor during bear market, the value of your cryptocurrency will go down where you were unable to avoid. Those reviews from ICO websites should never be trusted anyway and we must always do our own research instead of relying to those paid ratings.
Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
When I invested in the ICO project in a bear market, most of them lost money. I also invested in the FTEC project. When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
By checking white paper and team members profiles, you can make sure that the project is not a SCAM, at least at some degree. But it is not enough to give you any guaranty on getting profit.
Unfortunately, but it is more important whether the team is able to organize good marketing and arranges a listing on good exchanges, pay for bots on exchanges to disperse prices, etc.
You can predict such things by analyzing funds that also invest in this project or partnership with companies - market-makers
Unfortunately, but it is more important whether the team is able to organize good marketing and arranges a listing on good exchanges, pay for bots on exchanges to disperse prices, etc.
You can predict such things by analyzing funds that also invest in this project or partnership with companies - market-makers
Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
First the team, second the Platform and its working product or services offered. These is very important to me because this is the primary driver of the platform's token utilization and create demand in order to the start up to thrive it needs to be used and utilized at all means. When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
I have never trusted ico rating sites. If I'm going to invest in an ico, the most important condition has always been the ico's team. I look at what people in the team are experts on and their careers in the past.
- The ico ratings sites are just forged, the projects pay them to advertise for the project, cheat the investors, I also never believe in the information they provide, the thing that I always check is probably the team as you say, if the development team has enough credibility and fame, the reliability of the project is very high and vice versa. Some other things that I also often check are the community and the manager of their bounty campaign, good community and development combined with a reputable bounty manager, it helps to advertise the project, the chances of success are very high, no reason not to invest Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
Team complectation. The more the project the more developers they need. If there are only marketing specialists, you will not get any profit.
Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
When the person was a driver and next day it becomes an advisor, it is a sign for me that I need to find out more about other team members or even pass it buy.
I have never trusted ico rating sites. If I'm going to invest in an ico, the most important condition has always been the ico's team. I look at what people in the team are experts on and their careers in the past.
Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
I think you are little bit late with your wish to invest in ICO, nowadays even the best projects don't give profit, it was 2-3 projects in autumn which were listed on exchanges above ICO price and very often, for common people, it is very hard to invest in those projects, you must win in lottery or something similar.
There is a lot of aspect that we must check before joining tokensale on an ICO. Check out their team members and advisor, take a look at their background and experience, how is the quality of the project, read their whitepaper, and many other things to be checked.
According to me, the most important thing that I will check before investing into any ICOs is their team members and their Platform. Cause if any projects want to get success in icos then they need to have expert team members and most important is their platform. Cause I can see their future plan and concept of their projects.
I am look to the 2 things:
How many ico collected already and try to find proofs of earned moneys (wallet balances)
Who in team and what the projects they complete succesful before
How many ico collected already and try to find proofs of earned moneys (wallet balances)
Who in team and what the projects they complete succesful before
Most of fake ICOs offer huge bonuses just because they do not care about future price of token. In such situations, you should pay attention to business plan.
Jump to: