^^^ In addition, there were 60 million to 100 million executions during the 1900s in Russia. Most of these were Christians executed by the Jews who made up almost 100% of the Soviet Government starting with Stalin's "reign" if not earlier. Many of these Jews are the same Jews who were repatriated into modern Israel starting in 1948.
From the research I've been doing recently (trawling a lot of 'revisionist' scholars among other sources) it looks like you are almost inverted. (No surprise if you are a Western educated individual, see below.) Looks to me as though the earliest Bolshevik government was in the 'almost 100% Jewish' character while that character faded over time. It's said that in the early days there were a lot of people who didn't even speak Russian and they needed translators for the Yiddish speakers, but this was not documented and could be bullshit.
What is fairly clear is that Trotsky (born Bronstein) was bumming around in America just prior to the Bolshevik revolution and went over with a lot of people and money. The people seemed to be the 1900 equiv of today's antifa (Jewish academics and meth-heads) and the money via Jacob Schiff (who himself was earlier sent over by the Rothschild dynasty for various exploits including instantiation of a privately owned central bank which was eventually successful and which we still have today in the Federal (so-called) Reserve.)
Lenin was supposedly chosen (in full agreement with Trotsky) for leadership because he was not Jewish, or not known to be. A lot of 'revisionist' scholarship is focused on elucidating how true this may have been. Stalin (born Dzhugashvili) was similarly not considered Jewish but today's revisionists try to make the point that his name translates to 'son of a Jew' and most/all of his wives, concubines, and children were Jewish. Not unlike Donald Trump, interestingly enough.
Khrushchev was the first Soviet leader who is not really suspected of being a Jew by almost anyone, but he didn't last.
Prior to a week ago I'd vaguely known that Solzhenitsyn wrote 'The Gulag Archipelago' and won a Nobel prize. What I didn't realize was that he got a Nobel for a much earlier short story released in a brief but of relative openness under Khrushchev. Due to this thread I've been trying to piece together the Jewish animosity to our 2nd amendment here in the U.S., and ran across this piece:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Solzhenitsyn-Chap16.htmlI was confused about how in the Hell Solzhenitsyn could ever get a Nobel since that organization are notable politically correct and 'pinko'. The answer is that Solzhenitsyn's legacy of brutal honesty was yet to be established.
What happened was that the strong contingent of people sympathetic to the Bolshevik revolution (and hoping to arrange the same thing all over) really could not deny the nightmare aspects of the USSR, and the Jewish nature of the Bolshevik revolution was also cumbersome to deal with. What they could do, however, was to blame all of the 'bad' on Stalin, and they had made significant progress in academia and society. Solzhenitsyn's work hurt because it exposed the lie. 'Counter-revolution' started right away and was horrific from that time onward. Stalin was particularly awful though.
Solzhenitsyn makes the point that the Soviet leadership of Russia actually harbored a hatred of the Russian people themselves. This was interesting to me because for a few years I've explored the hypothesis that American leadership actually harbors a hatred the American people themselves. (Cannot blame them really since the feeling is fairly mutual.) From that perspective a lot of the 'failures' of the health care system, education system, quagmire wars, etc, etc, really make a lot of sense. When a hypothesis fits well with observation it is worth exploring further.
---
Whether true, half-true, or utter BS, this is certainly 'heretical' to Western educated masses of 2018:
http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/bolshies.html
