Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 21. (Read 450482 times)
gun control is indispensable. and I think people who have guns are just authorities. if the weapons are not in control it will be very dangerous for example if there is a demo in the country and people use gun to fight this officer will take a lot of casualties. so in my opinion the weapon needs to be in control
No need for it. Without them nobody can protect anyone anymore. It's an essential part to the human civilization in this day and age. We might as well go back to hunting and gathering our own food supply.
But everything is covered by chemtrails. This means that poisons are in either the garden or the hunted/gathered food.
Is it time for us to turn our guns on the planes that spray the chemtrails?
In ancient Greece and Rome, the only category of population that did not have the right to purchase and carry weapons with them was slaves, the most deprived part of the population. All other segments of the population of ancient Greece and Rome (and the rich and the poor) had the right to acquire and bear arms.
But the rights you are talking about, were forced rights. The slave had the right to fight for his freedom in any way he wanted. This didn't guarantee his success. But he had the right to fight.
Guns in the hands of everyone help to reduce slavery.
No need for it. Without them nobody can protect anyone anymore. It's an essential part to the human civilization in this day and age. We might as well go back to hunting and gathering our own food supply.
In ancient Greece and Rome, the only category of population that did not have the right to purchase and carry weapons with them was slaves, the most deprived part of the population. All other segments of the population of ancient Greece and Rome (and the rich and the poor) had the right to acquire and bear arms.
Why black Americans are demanding their gun rights, even while oppressive liberal mobs ...
Mark Robinson addresses Greensboro City Council on gun show ban
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dZn0D_9VY8
Read more at https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-08-why-black-americans-are-demanding-their-gun-rights.html.
Quote from: https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-08-why-black-americans-are-demanding-their-gun-rights.html
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, socioeconomic status and levels of education are fed up with Nanny State liberalism, Left-wing Marxism, and the Democratic Party in general when it comes to their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, as was demonstrated recently at a city council meeting in North Carolina.
While speaking during a meeting of the Greensboro council on the topic of curbing gun violence, Mark Robinson, who is black, blasted members over their desire to possibly cancel an upcoming bi-annual gun show that is held at a local venue.
"When are you all gonna start standing up for the majority? … I'm the majority! I'm a law-abiding citizen who's never shot anybody," Robinson railed. "It seems every time we have one of these shootings, nobody wants to put the blame where it goes, which is at the shooter's feet. You want to put it at my feet! It doesn't make any sense."
"You want to restrict my right to buy a firearm and protect myself from some of the very people you are talking about in here tonight," Robinson continued. "The law-abiding citizens of this community, of other communities, we are the first ones taxed and the last ones considered."
Warming up, Robinson got into it. He noted that elected officials and anti-gun liberals who seek to make it harder or even impossible in some cases for American citizens like him to engage in their right to self-defense make it easier for the criminal element to kill more people more easily.
"It's ridiculous," he said. "I don't think ["Twilight Zone" creator] Rod Serling could come up with a better script."
Robinson dropped more truth bombs. While admitting that he and other law-abiding citizens would turn in their guns if the law required it, "the Crips and the Bloods" — violent street gangs — "are gonna hold onto theirs. And what do you think is gonna happen when you send the police down there to take them?" (Related: Rapper Killer Mike warns that Democrats' gun-grabbing will "progress us into slavery.")
He noted that the police department was already short-handed, overworked, and — importantly — mocked and derided as racist, bigoted, and inherently unfair. He said that the council, and other liberals, seek to demonize the police "while making the criminals victims."
He's right, of course. On every point.
Not that the America Left cares, mind you. They don't. Guns-and-crime facts don't matter to them. Statistics don't matter. Heck, even certain constitutional rights don't matter.
But they should matter, and that was the ultimate point that Robinson was making.
You can take away a right — or limit it so severely that it may as well not exist — but that doesn't take away threats. That won't make the city of Greensboro safer. It won't dispel or disable the criminal element.
While speaking during a meeting of the Greensboro council on the topic of curbing gun violence, Mark Robinson, who is black, blasted members over their desire to possibly cancel an upcoming bi-annual gun show that is held at a local venue.
"When are you all gonna start standing up for the majority? … I'm the majority! I'm a law-abiding citizen who's never shot anybody," Robinson railed. "It seems every time we have one of these shootings, nobody wants to put the blame where it goes, which is at the shooter's feet. You want to put it at my feet! It doesn't make any sense."
"You want to restrict my right to buy a firearm and protect myself from some of the very people you are talking about in here tonight," Robinson continued. "The law-abiding citizens of this community, of other communities, we are the first ones taxed and the last ones considered."
Warming up, Robinson got into it. He noted that elected officials and anti-gun liberals who seek to make it harder or even impossible in some cases for American citizens like him to engage in their right to self-defense make it easier for the criminal element to kill more people more easily.
"It's ridiculous," he said. "I don't think ["Twilight Zone" creator] Rod Serling could come up with a better script."
Robinson dropped more truth bombs. While admitting that he and other law-abiding citizens would turn in their guns if the law required it, "the Crips and the Bloods" — violent street gangs — "are gonna hold onto theirs. And what do you think is gonna happen when you send the police down there to take them?" (Related: Rapper Killer Mike warns that Democrats' gun-grabbing will "progress us into slavery.")
He noted that the police department was already short-handed, overworked, and — importantly — mocked and derided as racist, bigoted, and inherently unfair. He said that the council, and other liberals, seek to demonize the police "while making the criminals victims."
He's right, of course. On every point.
Not that the America Left cares, mind you. They don't. Guns-and-crime facts don't matter to them. Statistics don't matter. Heck, even certain constitutional rights don't matter.
But they should matter, and that was the ultimate point that Robinson was making.
You can take away a right — or limit it so severely that it may as well not exist — but that doesn't take away threats. That won't make the city of Greensboro safer. It won't dispel or disable the criminal element.
Mark Robinson addresses Greensboro City Council on gun show ban
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dZn0D_9VY8
Read more at https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-08-why-black-americans-are-demanding-their-gun-rights.html.
I never used a gun but dont need a gun because im not harmful for other guys at this reason they dont harmful for me.
Tell that to all the peaceful people that Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Temujin, and many others like them had killed.
Somebody who doesn't like gun control, and who doesn't like your talk, might simply use his guns on you. You better arm up so that you have a way to protect yourself.
Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.
Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?
Gun control laws are useless if guns can be easily bought in the black market. I aggree with gun control, people who would like to acquire firearms should undergo in several test and seminars before they can have one. They should be regularly checked psychologically too, to check wether they're still capable of having it.
In Japan they have a thorough system with possesing a gun, and you'll choose to rather not have it.
Gun control is very neccessary to be implemented, to avoid abuse and crimes. It should be used properly by the government authorities
The Government Hates Your Guns by Bill Buppert
Read more at http://zerogov.com/?p=5659
Quote from: http://zerogov.com/?p=5659
"The right to buy weapons is the right to be free."
? A.E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher
"Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."
– Luke 22:36
The NRA will not save your ability to defend yourself, they are invested in the government just as much as the commies…
The weapons prohibitionists who seek to eradicate all private ownership of guns, and notably have no such case for government arms, are at it again. Usually the murder of apex political violence brokers by private gunmen like Boothe, Guiteau, Czolcosg, and Oswald sets the gun prohibitionists in a lather. Much like the frustration of the American central state in the first 150 years of failing to be capable of imposing a mandatory and trackable tax on income until 1913; the attempts remained feeble and uncoordinated until the Kennedys were killed in the 1960s; the magical combination of bureaucratic horsepower, accountancy standards, tracking of arms through a nation-wide database and the political will on the part of American collectivists (twice as many Republicans as Democrats would vote for the 1968 Gun Control Act, a horrific infringement on self-defense that would start the cascade of nonsense that would bloom like communist inspired kudzu across the fruited plain).
? A.E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher
"Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."
– Luke 22:36
The NRA will not save your ability to defend yourself, they are invested in the government just as much as the commies…
The weapons prohibitionists who seek to eradicate all private ownership of guns, and notably have no such case for government arms, are at it again. Usually the murder of apex political violence brokers by private gunmen like Boothe, Guiteau, Czolcosg, and Oswald sets the gun prohibitionists in a lather. Much like the frustration of the American central state in the first 150 years of failing to be capable of imposing a mandatory and trackable tax on income until 1913; the attempts remained feeble and uncoordinated until the Kennedys were killed in the 1960s; the magical combination of bureaucratic horsepower, accountancy standards, tracking of arms through a nation-wide database and the political will on the part of American collectivists (twice as many Republicans as Democrats would vote for the 1968 Gun Control Act, a horrific infringement on self-defense that would start the cascade of nonsense that would bloom like communist inspired kudzu across the fruited plain).
Read more at http://zerogov.com/?p=5659
YouTube Shooting Witness: "I Didn't Have a Gun on Me, But Wish I Did"
Read more at https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-03/i-didnt-have-gun-me-wish-i-did-says-youtube-shooting-witness.
Quote from: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-03/i-didnt-have-gun-me-wish-i-did-says-youtube-shooting-witness
"I didn't have a gun on me, but wish I did," said the man, who was ordering food across from the company's headquarters when the shooting began.
"I knew I had to be smart. You've got to be fast. You've got to think fast."
Police confirmed that the female shooter, who has not been named, was not a YouTube employee and didn't know anyone at the company. Witnesses say the shooting broke out at an employee party, which is thought to be how the woman may have gained access to the building.
It didn't take long before the YouTube shooting turned political. After journalist Jack Posobiec tweeted an official report from a local Bay Area news outlet listing the shooter as a "white, adult female wearing a dark top and head scarf," blue-checked Twitter users performed quick mental gymnastics to arrive at the conclusion that conservatives are "spreading vile conspiracies that ANTIFA is behind the YouTube HQ shooting."
"I knew I had to be smart. You've got to be fast. You've got to think fast."
Police confirmed that the female shooter, who has not been named, was not a YouTube employee and didn't know anyone at the company. Witnesses say the shooting broke out at an employee party, which is thought to be how the woman may have gained access to the building.
It didn't take long before the YouTube shooting turned political. After journalist Jack Posobiec tweeted an official report from a local Bay Area news outlet listing the shooter as a "white, adult female wearing a dark top and head scarf," blue-checked Twitter users performed quick mental gymnastics to arrive at the conclusion that conservatives are "spreading vile conspiracies that ANTIFA is behind the YouTube HQ shooting."
Read more at https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-03/i-didnt-have-gun-me-wish-i-did-says-youtube-shooting-witness.
London Homeowner ARRESTED FOR MURDER After Killing Armed Burglar
Read more and click the links at http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/london-homeowner-arrested-for-murder-after-killing-armed-burglar_04042018.
The burglar was stabbed in the homeowner's kitchen as a second thief fled, and later died at the hospital.
As violence surges across the pond in London, homeowners have had to take the defense of their lives and property into their own hands – but the UK government is punishing them for it. According to The Daily Mail, a 78-year-old homeowner has been arrested by murder detectives after clashing with a suspected burglar who later died from a stab wound.
Someone should tell those in the governments violating basic fundamental human rights that self-defense is one of those basic human rights.
As violence surges across the pond in London, homeowners have had to take the defense of their lives and property into their own hands – but the UK government is punishing them for it. According to The Daily Mail, a 78-year-old homeowner has been arrested by murder detectives after clashing with a suspected burglar who later died from a stab wound.
Someone should tell those in the governments violating basic fundamental human rights that self-defense is one of those basic human rights.
Read more and click the links at http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/london-homeowner-arrested-for-murder-after-killing-armed-burglar_04042018.
It need to be controlled. Only security guys should have guns. Public does not need guns. Gun licenses shiuld be limited .
Stabbings Increase Despite UK Knife Crackdown. London Murders Surpass NYC
Read more at http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/stabbings-increase-despite-uk-knife-crackdown-london-murders-surpass-nyc/.
We hear so much about gun murders that it might surprise you to find out that London's murder rate has just surpassed New York City's so far in 2018.
But don't worry, their gun murder rate is still much lower. People are just getting stabbed to death.
That's one way to solve the gun crime problem. Great Britain has some of the toughest gun laws. Citizens are virtually banned from carrying a handgun for any reason. Although guns were still involved in three of the 12 murders that took place in London in March.
It is also illegal to carry a knife in the UK. And some lawmakers want to increase the jail sentence for being caught with a knife.
As usual, politicians become ever more authoritarian to combat violence. But violence is a symptom of larger problems. One of them is the government preventing individuals from protecting themselves–with guns, knives, or even their own fists.
But don't worry, their gun murder rate is still much lower. People are just getting stabbed to death.
That's one way to solve the gun crime problem. Great Britain has some of the toughest gun laws. Citizens are virtually banned from carrying a handgun for any reason. Although guns were still involved in three of the 12 murders that took place in London in March.
It is also illegal to carry a knife in the UK. And some lawmakers want to increase the jail sentence for being caught with a knife.
As usual, politicians become ever more authoritarian to combat violence. But violence is a symptom of larger problems. One of them is the government preventing individuals from protecting themselves–with guns, knives, or even their own fists.
Read more at http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/stabbings-increase-despite-uk-knife-crackdown-london-murders-surpass-nyc/.
Youre saying that gun is to kill. Of course you need to kill somebody, who wants to kill you. So its for protection to yourself or to your family.
What about a gun control? I think government releasing a license for anyone to get a gun for themselves. So it's gonna be legal.
What about a gun control? I think government releasing a license for anyone to get a gun for themselves. So it's gonna be legal.
In India, we need a license to own a gun. The process is so cumbersome and time taking, that less than 1% of the people who want to own a gun end up getting it. The remaining 99% are at the mercy of the criminals.
We know what guns are for? We should know what guns can do for all of us. We should seek for some reasons why there are guns. We should atleast have rules for guns. Guns are made for our own protection, but when abused, we dont know what gonna happen.
Youre saying that gun is to kill. Of course you need to kill somebody, who wants to kill you. So its for protection to yourself or to your family.
What about a gun control? I think government releasing a license for anyone to get a gun for themselves. So it's gonna be legal.
What about a gun control? I think government releasing a license for anyone to get a gun for themselves. So it's gonna be legal.
Laws and controls, which are relevant for the standard individuals, are typically not implemented on the ultra-rich and the government officials. It doesn't make a difference whether the legislator is master weapon rights or hostile to firearm rights. The Senate and the House will ensure that they are permitted to claim guns, despite the fact that the ownership of the same is prohibited for the common individuals.
In the U.S., the wealthy and powerful tend to have armed guards around them whenever they go out and about. The upper-middle class tend to live in well patrolled and/or gated communities where their minions have guns and where they don't have to go out into any part of the real world unless they choose to. Normally their chosen coffee-shop is also in the protected zone.
Nowhere in all this talk about getting rid of the 2nd amendment is anyone talking about depriving these controlled protector class guard ants of their guns. It's the woman who's enraged ex-boyfriend has promised to show up at her place at 2:00am and kill her who has to go back to her house and hope for the best. Such problem are a whole different world than the gun-grabber class is familiar with. And if the ex-boyfriend lives up to his promise, oh well...there are to many people anyway.
Gun control revolves around who you trust to control guns. If you think you trust someone with guns, give him all your money to hold for you. Do you trust him that much? You better. Because, if he can control the guns, you don't have any way to keep him from taking your money.
Laws and controls, which are relevant for the standard individuals, are typically not implemented on the ultra-rich and the government officials. It doesn't make a difference whether the legislator is master weapon rights or hostile to firearm rights. The Senate and the House will ensure that they are permitted to claim guns, despite the fact that the ownership of the same is prohibited for the common individuals.
Jump to: