Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 85. (Read 450482 times)
I know this thread might consider murricans at most, but let me tell you. Here in Serbia you're not allowed to carry/have a weapon in your possession unless you're a policemen, security, etc... or a registered hunter, so many people have hidden stashes here and let me tell you, that's bullshit. I live in a small town, about 1h from capital, and the crime rate is low, usually some gipsies start fights and things like that but when I'm returning home from town and for me to get to the center of the city from my home takes about 20min, but late at night there are so many dodgy guys that can make you a little unsettled, and there were known attacks by local junkies, so I'd actually like to have some kind of a firearm with me, just in case. So, I don't know what situation is worse... yours where everyone can get a hold of a gun easly or not have one at all here.
Pepe think that Guns should be as widely available as cars or computers.
It's important not to restrict the access.
Guns are necessary to be a free person.
It's important not to restrict the access.
Guns are necessary to be a free person.
But guns should not be sold out like they're candies, then some troubled people can get to the much easier... There needs to be some evaluation of the potential carrier/buyer.
Pepe think that Guns should be as widely available as cars or computers.
It's important not to restrict the access.
Guns are necessary to be a free person.
It's important not to restrict the access.
Guns are necessary to be a free person.
Gun Range Owner Reveals Secrets to Bypassing California's Upcoming AR-15 Ban
Read more at http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html.
I don't understand how you can live in one state and have different laws in every state. Really it was impossible to negotiate and to make a General law. And the restriction of rights to use weapons in my opinion contradicts the principle of the United States.Quote from: http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html
Describing how California's SB-880 will re-define "assault weapons," Jacob Belemjian of The Firing Line shooting range in Clovis points out exactly what parts of the rifle will make the gun illegal at the start of the new year, and what can be modified on the gun to make it legal.
Despite the AR-15 he uses as an example requiring a special tool in order to detach the magazine, Belemjian says the feature, which in the past allowed the gun to bypass detachable gun magazine restrictions, means the gun would be in violation of the new laws.
Under the new law, a "fixed magazine" is now defined as "an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
Belemjian also described other features on his example centerfire, semi-automatic rifle that would make it illegal, such as the aforementioned detachable magazine and any of the following features: a collapsible, or adjustable, or foldable stock; a pistol grip that protrudes below the trigger guard; a forward pistol grip; and a flash hider.
Despite the AR-15 he uses as an example requiring a special tool in order to detach the magazine, Belemjian says the feature, which in the past allowed the gun to bypass detachable gun magazine restrictions, means the gun would be in violation of the new laws.
Under the new law, a "fixed magazine" is now defined as "an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
Belemjian also described other features on his example centerfire, semi-automatic rifle that would make it illegal, such as the aforementioned detachable magazine and any of the following features: a collapsible, or adjustable, or foldable stock; a pistol grip that protrudes below the trigger guard; a forward pistol grip; and a flash hider.
Read more at http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html.
Gun Range Owner Reveals Secrets to Bypassing California's Upcoming AR-15 Ban
Read more at http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html.
Quote from: http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html
Describing how California's SB-880 will re-define "assault weapons," Jacob Belemjian of The Firing Line shooting range in Clovis points out exactly what parts of the rifle will make the gun illegal at the start of the new year, and what can be modified on the gun to make it legal.
Despite the AR-15 he uses as an example requiring a special tool in order to detach the magazine, Belemjian says the feature, which in the past allowed the gun to bypass detachable gun magazine restrictions, means the gun would be in violation of the new laws.
Under the new law, a "fixed magazine" is now defined as "an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
Belemjian also described other features on his example centerfire, semi-automatic rifle that would make it illegal, such as the aforementioned detachable magazine and any of the following features: a collapsible, or adjustable, or foldable stock; a pistol grip that protrudes below the trigger guard; a forward pistol grip; and a flash hider.
Despite the AR-15 he uses as an example requiring a special tool in order to detach the magazine, Belemjian says the feature, which in the past allowed the gun to bypass detachable gun magazine restrictions, means the gun would be in violation of the new laws.
Under the new law, a "fixed magazine" is now defined as "an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
Belemjian also described other features on his example centerfire, semi-automatic rifle that would make it illegal, such as the aforementioned detachable magazine and any of the following features: a collapsible, or adjustable, or foldable stock; a pistol grip that protrudes below the trigger guard; a forward pistol grip; and a flash hider.
Read more at http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-range-owner-reveals-secrets-to-bypassing-californias-upcoming-ar-15-ban.html.
I don't think solutions is to ban the guns. It won't prevent people from killing each other. It can do only education and deep understanding of this world and conciousness itself.
So I would let it be although I'm not going to join the fight for it.
You say so only because you have not yet been touched by the crime. When you are robbing and you will have nothing to fight back, then you probably change your mind., but it's too late. Even if the gun you will need 1 once in a lifetime, it is necessary to carry the whole life.So I would let it be although I'm not going to join the fight for it.
I don't think solutions is to ban the guns. It won't prevent people from killing each other. It can do only education and deep understanding of this world and conciousness itself.
So I would let it be although I'm not going to join the fight for it.
You say so only because you have not yet been touched by the crime. When you are robbing and you will have nothing to fight back, then you probably change your mind., but it's too late. Even if the gun you will need 1 once in a lifetime, it is necessary to carry the whole life. So I would let it be although I'm not going to join the fight for it.
Have Gun -- Will Travel: How to Fly With Your Firearm
Read more at http://www.artofmanliness.com/2014/12/11/how-to-fly-with-your-firearm/.
The Vanguard was basically 36 hours of man skills — we learned how to humanely slaughter rabbits and chickens, land navigation, and even some self-defense techniques from Tim Kennedy. It was awesome. I'll be doing a full write-up on it soon, so stay tuned for that.
One segment of the event was a firearms class, and we needed to bring our own pistol and ammo to participate in it. Because I was flying, I would have to pack my gun for the trip. Having endured, along with my fellow Americans, thirteen years of taking off our shoes, putting our tiny toiletries in see-through baggies, and getting patted down by TSA agents, I figured flying with an actual, honest-to-goodness weapon would be a nightmare fraught with all sorts of bureaucratic, red tape rigmarole.
As it turned out, except for a small mishap, flying with a gun is surprisingly easy. Today I'll share my experience and what I learned from it, in case any of you find yourself needing to travel with firearms and ammunition.
One segment of the event was a firearms class, and we needed to bring our own pistol and ammo to participate in it. Because I was flying, I would have to pack my gun for the trip. Having endured, along with my fellow Americans, thirteen years of taking off our shoes, putting our tiny toiletries in see-through baggies, and getting patted down by TSA agents, I figured flying with an actual, honest-to-goodness weapon would be a nightmare fraught with all sorts of bureaucratic, red tape rigmarole.
As it turned out, except for a small mishap, flying with a gun is surprisingly easy. Today I'll share my experience and what I learned from it, in case any of you find yourself needing to travel with firearms and ammunition.
Read more at http://www.artofmanliness.com/2014/12/11/how-to-fly-with-your-firearm/.
I don't think solutions is to ban the guns. It won't prevent people from killing each other. It can do only education and deep understanding of this world and conciousness itself.
So I would let it be although I'm not going to join the fight for it.
So I would let it be although I'm not going to join the fight for it.
I say yes to guns! Let's shoot everybody who is against our opinions shall we? Kidding. I am against every single people to have guns. It causes to much drama and deaths. Why not let's all love each other and stop killing each other.
Unfortunately this is not possible. All the people on earth are different and there is always a reason for discontent and indignation. Crimes can be prevented only by the inevitability of punishment. The weapon in this helps. Maybe because with him and trying to fight?
I say yes to guns! Let's shoot everybody who is against our opinions shall we? Kidding. I am against every single people to have guns. It causes to much drama and deaths. Why not let's all love each other and stop killing each other.
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
21 years is OK with me. But I am definitely not going to support rising the age to 45 years. It just lacks any logic. How are you going to argue that those under 45 years does not have any right to defend themselves?
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
21 years is OK with me. But I am definitely not going to support rising the age to 45 years. It just lacks any logic. How are you going to argue that those under 45 years does not have any right to defend themselves?
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
21 years is OK with me. But I am definitely not going to support rising the age to 45 years. It just lacks any logic. How are you going to argue that those under 45 years does not have any right to defend themselves?
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
Who forbids others to have guns? If they do it with guns, then guns are not forbidden.
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
PCP air rifles are allowed without any licence and you can buy them online, but they are deadly. Take a look at this penetration test of one of the most powerful PCP guns on the market: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KjK74vicBA These bullets could go through human skull with ease and there are videos of people hunting boars with them.
What about bows? You don't need a permit to have one, they are silent, can be folded to fit a suitcase or a backpack and have enough force to pin a person to a wall.
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
Guys as we all know is a dangerous weapon and this what the government has control power over like in my country every has the right to punches gun for as long you are above the age of 18 but in my own opinion guns should be punches by men only who are above 45 years of age only cause these class of age can use it in a reasonable way
What sort of insane logic is this? I agree banning the ownership of guns by minors. But minors, mean anyone under the age of 18. Anyone above that age should have the right of gun ownership.
I am a European. I cannot understand why Americans want to have so many people owning guns.
The biggest massacre involving guns happened in Europe. It occurred in a country, which is having one of the toughest gun control laws (Norway) in the world. A lunatic called Anders Behring Breivik was single-handedly able to mow down a total of 77 people, and the policemen present at the scene could not do anything, as they were not armed.
It wasn't that the police present couldn't do anything, he had set off a bomb in the capital city to throw the police off, then he attacked the children on an island that couldn't be quickly reached.
The guy was/is a lunatic and it is dreadful that he managed to get a weapon. I would prefer that he wasn't able to get a gun, instead of giving lots of people guns to shoot each other in this kind of case (I doubt it would have made a difference as it was a Political Youth camp he attacked, probably not somewhere where people would be armed anyway)
I'm also European and I think the same as you. I can't understand why Americans are so against gun control. I think most people on this planet are stupid. You could give guns to monkeys with the same effect. Sorry but this is my opinion. I'm not the smartest person in the world and don't think I am better than other people. We have everything to create here on Earth heaven for everybody, but look around you, watch news, read some history books, and tell me honestly that most of the people aren't stupid.
Gun control is a term that can mean lots of things. Americans like the idea of gun control. The thing they don't like is being forced into it.
You haven't figured out, yet, have you, that it is because of American and Swiss gun freedom that the world remains as free as it is. That's why you can have peace in your country, even though there might not be any guns at all... because of American and Swiss gun freedom.
I am a European. I cannot understand why Americans want to have so many people owning guns.
The biggest massacre involving guns happened in Europe. It occurred in a country, which is having one of the toughest gun control laws (Norway) in the world. A lunatic called Anders Behring Breivik was single-handedly able to mow down a total of 77 people, and the policemen present at the scene could not do anything, as they were not armed.
It wasn't that the police present couldn't do anything, he had set off a bomb in the capital city to throw the police off, then he attacked the children on an island that couldn't be quickly reached.
The guy was/is a lunatic and it is dreadful that he managed to get a weapon. I would prefer that he wasn't able to get a gun, instead of giving lots of people guns to shoot each other in this kind of case (I doubt it would have made a difference as it was a Political Youth camp he attacked, probably not somewhere where people would be armed anyway)
I'm also European and I think the same as you. I can't understand why Americans are so against gun control. I think most people on this planet are stupid. You could give guns to monkeys with the same effect. Sorry but this is my opinion. I'm not the smartest person in the world and don't think I am better than other people. We have everything to create here on Earth heaven for everybody, but look around you, watch news, read some history books, and tell me honestly that most of the people aren't stupid.
Jump to: