That is exactly the aim behind gun control. Leftist parties such as the Democrat party in the United States want to protect burglars and home invaders from the rifles and shotguns of the home owners.
The hard-core Leftists want to deprecate private property ownership and move to collective ownership, but they don't/cannot think much beyond that. The people who animate and empower the Leftist want corporate ownership with individuals renting everything (from them.) They see the collectivists as useful idiots since the the path to their respective goals starts out the same.
Ultimately one of the 'selling points' of renting from corp/gov will be personal safety and security. If private individuals and communities can maintain security on their own, this selling point is not as powerful and swaths of property will remain outside of their control. Worse still, the quality of life will be better in such communities than in the factory-farm style 'human habitats' created for maximum profitability. No amount of public relations will be able to hide this reality. I suspect that this is one of the driving forces behind disarming the population.
The same basic principle is currently playing out on a global scale. The Technocrats working toward a one-world corporate structured government cannot tolerate a functional non-aligned nation state (e.g., Russia or the U.S.) to exist because they will not be able to argue that the life they create for the peeps is the best that is possible. The grass will look greener on the other side of the fence because it will be. States like North Korea work around this problem as best they can by making a high fence which cannot be be seen through.