Free people always have weapons. And limitations of the rules of acquisition of weapons is a restriction of freedom.
If we consider how much domestic crimes with the help of legal weapons carried in the broken country, it can be concluded that the weapon at home is very bad. 
Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 94. (Read 450482 times)
Free people always have weapons. And limitations of the rules of acquisition of weapons is a restriction of freedom.
This approach puts people at a disadvantage.Someone can protect themselves with weapons, and some don't. It is not correct.
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
The main issue is protection and safety. If people feels they are not safe, they will find a ways for them to be protected from their enemy or other bad people.I think the government is now strict in giving licenses,they are very careful in issuing it.
The government should be a touching on this issue. It is necessary to establish a clear list who can authorize the purchase of weapons, and who does not. This will ensure control and security
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
The main issue is protection and safety. If people feels they are not safe, they will find a ways for them to be protected from their enemy or other bad people.I think the government is now strict in giving licenses,they are very careful in issuing it.
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
The main issue is protection and safety. If people feels they are not safe, they will find a ways for them to be protected from their enemy or other bad people.I think the government is now strict in giving licenses,they are very careful in issuing it.
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
The main issue is protection and safety. If people feels they are not safe, they will find a ways for them to be protected from their enemy or other bad people.I think the government is now strict in giving licenses,they are very careful in issuing it.
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
i think that europe need to give gun control to pupils to destroy all mafia govrements in one shot
This topic should be renamed to "Where the International Criminals Union posts an endless stream of shit to 'justify' infringing human rights"
/unwatch
/unwatch
Hey Bro! You da Man! Yessir we need to stand United!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4igRfK2KLqU
I think an adult person should have the right to have a gun if that person can successfully pass some tests on mental health. And in the case that person is caught doing anything illegal or showing mental unstability the gun should be confiscated immediately.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
Free people don't have to prove that wanting to exercise their human right to self-defense isn't a mental illness.
Sorry, if I didn't make myself clear, but I didn't mean that the willing to have a gun to protect yourself can be somehow interpreted as a mental illness. I was just saying that only people in their right mind should be allowed to have guns. I think it's an obvious thing, we don't want armed lunatics on our streets.
But who is going to allow them? Government? Government are the people who are NOT in their right mind, or there wouldn't be any gun control issue.
To control the sale of weapons in each state is worth leash in case the citizens feel safe. If the state can not provide a quiet life, people are entitled to protection.
I think an adult person should have the right to have a gun if that person can successfully pass some tests on mental health. And in the case that person is caught doing anything illegal or showing mental unstability the gun should be confiscated immediately.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
Free people don't have to prove that wanting to exercise their human right to self-defense isn't a mental illness.
Sorry, if I didn't make myself clear, but I didn't mean that the willing to have a gun to protect yourself can be somehow interpreted as a mental illness. I was just saying that only people in their right mind should be allowed to have guns. I think it's an obvious thing, we don't want armed lunatics on our streets.
This topic should be renamed to "Where the International Criminals Union posts an endless stream of shit to 'justify' infringing human rights"
/unwatch
/unwatch
Arrest those person who have a gun without license. Gun is very dangerous tools.
Now a days, So many people have a gun using for self defence, but some of them
are using this in a bad way, to harrash people.
Now a days, So many people have a gun using for self defence, but some of them
are using this in a bad way, to harrash people.
i agree with this, because if someone have a gun without license, that person can harm people around him and could make someone to get killed. although in every country the laws about gun control is different, but the government should make a statement or constitution to explain that having a gun without license is prohibited and can make us get arrested.
i think the control of having a gun can make limitations of having a gun privately and can control crime in every place.
I think an adult person should have the right to have a gun if that person can successfully pass some tests on mental health. And in the case that person is caught doing anything illegal or showing mental unstability the gun should be confiscated immediately.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
It is right. Everyone has the right to defend his life. To do this, he should be able to buy weapons. But only if he is mentally healthy
How can you not understand that guns do not kill and kill the people in whose hands it is in. You can kill with a stick and to defend himself with a stick hard.
You can't not defend your self just to have hard stick on your hand if your enemy had gun already putting in your head nor in any part of your body you can say that you sure that you can defend your self ? if you had skills then you could but if you don't have it's better to give what he wants.there's no other option from that guns should be created to its purpose depending one selves to another but most of the gun holders
i'm saying all but most of them uses it as their advantage.
I think an adult person should have the right to have a gun if that person can successfully pass some tests on mental health. And in the case that person is caught doing anything illegal or showing mental unstability the gun should be confiscated immediately.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
Free people don't have to prove that wanting to exercise their human right to self-defense isn't a mental illness.
How can you not understand that guns do not kill and kill the people in whose hands it is in. You can kill with a stick and to defend himself with a stick hard.
You can't not defend your self just to have hard stick on your hand if your enemy had gun already putting in your head nor in any part of your body you can say that you sure that you can defend your self ? if you had skills then you could but if you don't have it's better to give what he wants. Arrest those person who have a gun without license. Gun is very dangerous tools.
Now a days, So many people have a gun using for self defence, but some of them
are using this in a bad way, to harrash people.
Now a days, So many people have a gun using for self defence, but some of them
are using this in a bad way, to harrash people.
Yes it should be, there should be a strict law pertaining the use of gun. The regulations and implementations must be strictly observed not only by the citizens but strictly uphold by the government. Taking the rights of people to own a gun is not also an option since many have guns bought illegally that harasses people so to defend ourselves we must be also armed but following the responsible gun handling.
Jump to: