Gun control doesn't necessarily mean that civil people don't get access to guns. It just means controls are put on them so that unauthorised people can't get hold of them.
how would you monitor unauthorized people from getting hold of fire arms and put a restriction when you have a open market where you can get a gun without any background check or even a license ,first impose some rules and then we can control the free market 
Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 96. (Read 450482 times)
Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.
This is a serious issue. I think gun control is not practical everywhere. What are the alternatives? Police can't be everywhere. Your place is a good reason why gun laws shouldn't be the same everywhere in my opinion.Everyday, peaceful people are very similar everywhere. They all need guns to help get rid of the terrorists. Governments are the biggest terrorist promoters. We can't get rid of governments, so let's keep our guns.
Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.
This is a serious issue. I think gun control is not practical everywhere. What are the alternatives? Police can't be everywhere. Your place is a good reason why gun laws shouldn't be the same everywhere in my opinion.My opinion on gun control rests differently with different countries.
The rules and requirements of every country is different, so are the needs.
Yup, mostly here in our country they use gun to kill people whose using drugs. The rules and requirements of every country is different, so are the needs.
I always wondered why patients in hospitals died. Thanks.
My opinion on gun control rests differently with different countries.
The rules and requirements of every country is different, so are the needs.
Yup, mostly here in our country they use gun to kill people whose using drugs. The rules and requirements of every country is different, so are the needs.
The problem here and in the US is you end up exhausted financially, and mentally defending yourself against a crooked establishment, I know some very intelligent people who have lost everything, including custody of their children for attempting to defend their basic rights.
If you set your life up so that you don't own anything, but rather so that you control "your" stuff, they can't take anything from you. Why not? Because you don't own it.
It is true that we have ignored the fundamentals of common law. If we hadn't ignored it all along, we wouldn't be in the mess we are. But if some of us don't take up the cause, it will become worse in the future. Consider your children and grandchildren.
In addition, if you do it the Karl Lentz way and start small, you can win.
The problem here and in the US is you end up exhausted financially, and mentally defending yourself against a crooked establishment, I know some very intelligent people who have lost everything, including custody of their children for attempting to defend their basic rights.
Gun control is a joke, except it isn't funny.
Once it is implemented expect your rights to evaporate rapidly.
It doesn't stop criminals, it stops law abiding cilvilians from defending themselves in their own homes.
Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.
Our gun laws are a farce, not an example anyone should follow.
t.Australian
Once it is implemented expect your rights to evaporate rapidly.
It doesn't stop criminals, it stops law abiding cilvilians from defending themselves in their own homes.
Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.
Our gun laws are a farce, not an example anyone should follow.
t.Australian
Australia has at its base of law, English Common Law, although they may have changed it to Australian Common Law.
This means that properly done, as long as there is no harm or damage, peoples' rights are above the civil law of government.
The things that Karl Lentz does in America, Canada and the United Kingdom, apply to Australia, as well.
For starters:
http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe.
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios.
http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page.
http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page.
http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl.
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube.
Other Info
http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable.
http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness."
Gun control is a joke, except it isn't funny.
Once it is implemented expect your rights to evaporate rapidly.
It doesn't stop criminals, it stops law abiding cilvilians from defending themselves in their own homes.
Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.
Our gun laws are a farce, not an example anyone should follow.
t.Australian
Once it is implemented expect your rights to evaporate rapidly.
It doesn't stop criminals, it stops law abiding cilvilians from defending themselves in their own homes.
Home invasions are at an all time high where I live, comitted by turd world immigrants with no scruples about using illegal firearms, the police wont come to the rescue, forget about it.
Our gun laws are a farce, not an example anyone should follow.
t.Australian
Gun control doesn't necessarily mean that civil people don't get access to guns. It just means controls are put on them so that unauthorised people can't get hold of them.
Then when the authorizers have control, they will authorize nobody to have guns, except their military that they will use to enforce complete gun control.
It's called Hitlerism, Stalinism, Maoism, and China today-ism when necessary, and many other countries all around the world, and often in Africa.
that is one of the main issue of the world is increasing from time to time, i think the UNO should take a strong action for controlling gun race that is really going to ruin the peace of the world.
Gun control doesn't necessarily mean that civil people don't get access to guns. It just means controls are put on them so that unauthorised people can't get hold of them.
People control is better. A guy with temper and other connected emotions might use it for personal gains.
Hitler want to control people.
Stalin want to control people.
Mao want to control people.
Many other want to control people.
Many people die from their control.
Gun freedom way better.
Let neighborhood people control neighborhood gun nuts, not Hitler, not Stalin, not Mao, not many other dictators, not Obama, not Hillary.
People control is better. A guy with temper and other connected emotions might use it for personal gains.
Control over observance of safety rules of storage of weapons is needed, but a ban on weapons of this attack on fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens. I think that there has not been without corruption.
Anyone had any problems. In America struggling with legal weapons, in Ukraine people are fighting for the right to have legal weapons. While illegal weapons in the hands of very many. What is better an illegal weapon on the hands or legal.
The presence of weapons among the population is not only an opportunity to protect themselves from criminals, but also millions trained to handle weapons people are willing to defend their country.
Except for the fact that people will not limit their rights, there's even more gun lobby which also does not allow the reduction of arms trafficking.
The more the country of freedom and democracy, the more liberal it the weapons act. Attempts to restrict access to weapons-a step toward dictatorship.
The only thing keeping the world free is American gun freedom. American gun freedom is the right of Americans to control their own guns in such a way that they can do anything with them as long as they don't harm anyone or damage his property. If Americans didn't have gun freedom, the world would have caved in to worldwide dictatorship long ago.
Jump to: