Topic: Where would Twitter go after its takeover by Elon Musk ? (Read 1158 times)

Forget it. Musk totally is NOT interested in buying and straightening out Wikipedia. Twitter is enough.

Wow! Government censorship on twitter included even the Department of Homeland Security.


DHS’ role in Twitter censorship before Elon Musk bought platform is exposed

---

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-01-24-dhs-role-in-twitter-censorship-before-elon-musk-exposed.html
We know that the FBI was heavy into moving Twitter, under the old management team, to ban and censor some users and content that did not parrot the deep state’s narratives on a range of issues from vote fraud in 2020, government-sponsored COVID-19 misinformation, the dangers of coronavirus vaccines, and, of course, the suppression of incriminating evidence and information on Hunter Biden’s damning laptop.

We also know that the Department of Homeland Security was involved somewhat, but now we learn that DHS’s involvement in censoring content and getting ‘problematic’ users booted off the platform was just as extensive as the FBI’s involvement, if not more so.

According to the Substack account Kanekoa the Great, the country should be grateful to billionaire Elon Musk, the SpaceX and Tesla CEO, for buying Twitter and tasking a number of journalists with exposing the collusion between federal agencies like the FBI and the former Twitter management team.

“What’s been missing from much of this analysis is the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) role in this censorship through a consortium called the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), made up of four organizations: the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, and Graphika, a social media analytics company,” Kanekoa noted.

“The EIP published a report on its censorship of the 2020 election, The Long Fuse: Misinformation and the 2020 Election, which describes how the private-public censorship consortium was formed in the summer of 2020 to ‘monitor and correct election mis- and disinformation,'” the report noted further.

In short, it appears as though the DHS and Twitter collusion racket was hiding in plain sight.
...

---

Here is where twitter has gone since the Musk takeover... into the world of showing the truth about political and government conspiracies.


How the FBI Used Twitter To Lie to You


https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/12/no_author/how-the-fbi-used-twitter-to-lie-to-you/
The FBI we know is a creation of Hollywood. From the beginning, J. Edgar Hoover sought to insert the bureau into movies and TV shows, to portray the agency as grounded in American values, and special agents as righteous competence personified. Even on the far-out “X-Files,” with its hinting at nefarious government activities, Agent Mulder’s one flaw was idealism bordering on naivete. For over a century, Hollywood has upheld the belief that a federal law enforcement/internal quasi-spy agency is necessary for the safety of a free society and its citizens.

This image of the FBI fails to highlight an important fact. The FBI is allowed to lie to you. They can lie to acquire information or encourage a confession. Unlike entertainment, agents don’t need a story to fill a certain screen time, or number of theater seats. They just need to convince a very small audience just dumb enough to reveal something incriminating to their new friends.

The Bureau had Hunter Biden’s laptop by December 2019, before Joe Biden was the Democrat candidate. Although Biden was such a ghost candidate that all his campaign events combined wouldn’t have filled a stadium washroom, trained, experienced FBI employees were desperate for the opposing candidate to lose, just as they’d opposed Candidate Trump in 2016.

...

More and more he's reminding me of the last person that had a ridiculous amount of power as well as a twitter addiction.

And of course he changes the rules in the middle of the game  



Oh boy, Elon thinks not hearting Elon is suspicious now ?
It's like when his daughter didn't want anything to do with him. Instead listening to her and looking at the mirror he blamed communism being taught in the schools. Because god forbit that he could be a bad parent.

So maybe he wants someone who actually knows what they are doing to run twitter .
Edward snowden offered to run it. I like the guy but this would mean there would be even more censorship because of where he lives. There would be pro Russian propaganda all over it or Snowden loses his asylum.

https://www.investing.com/news/cryptocurrency-news/edward-snowden-offers-to-take-over-as-twitter-ceo-for-salary-in-btc-2966953

My guess is that responsibilities and pressure were just too much for space karen. Advertisers don't want anything to do with him, just like his kid and wife. And it's hard to seem like hardcore freedom of speech activist when you want to censor things that annoy you.

The question is, how will the new CEO be selected? Another question: Will the new CEO be subject to Musk's control? Think about the reality of it all.

Oops... might have overestimated himself.



I hope he tries to weasel out of this, I don't want this trainwreck to end.

Noticing more and more click baity promoted posts (as well as snake oil health devices/services) in my timeline lately.  This one seems a bit over the top.



At this rate Twitter is going to look like something BADecker links to in no time.

Even if it was, he streisanded this shit bigly. Millions of people who never knew or cared about his jet - now might. Not that a real stalker would have needed those @elonjet tweets anyway.

Didn't he say that this was about that guy following his private plane on twitter, which is public data. Meanwhile he posts video in his feed about some guy's register plate who tried follow him. Like a normal man with 121 million mob of followers would see this as a responsible thing to do.

Imagine if that stalker guy gets doxxed and gets harassed turns out to be some mentally challenged or mental patient, which elon is now ridiculing and basically calling for justice. I am pretty sure this rocket genius haven't even thought this far.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1588394145034678272

Makes me think he wasn't kidding when he said that.

In general I'm pro-Elon but the idea that a privately-owned platform has the power to grant "free speech" has always been silly... He shouldn't have laid into that angle so much. And yes I do wince every time he posts something political or shares fake news. It's been a tough year.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and make a wild guess that those journalists may have said some less than pleasant things about Elon, Tesla, or something else that really really hurt Elon's feelings, like his jet.

This is beautiful, can't wait for the trumplings to spin it as free speech absolutism.

Seems like Elon has finally realized that when you own a social media company, you have the right to suspend whoever you want and nobody has any sort of constitutional right to post on twitter.  Maybe he'll get his cult of fan boys to quit crying about free speech when youtube takes down their racist rants or anti vax nonsense. 




Twitter Suspends Accounts of Half a Dozen Journalists
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/15/technology/twitter-suspends-journalist-accounts-elon-musk.html

Nobody can say whether Twitter is heading in the right direction or not we all just have to be patient and observe. So far, we have seen that since Elon Musk took over Twitter it has not been an easy ride. A lot of employees were fired well while some quit. There was also you off the blue marks subscription and verifying information on Twitter. Lately I have seen tweets from alone, sing that the engagement on Twitter has been at an all-time high. I believe that sooner or later Elon would make Twitter better than it has ever been.

So you think the 10s of millions of people in America that identify as liberal have a secret agenda to groom children so that they can have sex with them.  I mean that's just insane.  Posting child porn on twitter would would be handled in a similar way as posting a bomb threat with law enforcement being involved immediately.

You need to quit falling for whoever has been feeding you this nonsense.  Liberals are just people that have different political views than you.  Having a different opinion on how government should run doesn't make someone a monster and making up ridiculous stories about them trying to fuck children doesn't accomplish anything productive. 

You realize that 1) you're wrong & 2) you're literally proving my point.  Defending child porn on Twitter by claiming it doesn't exist is either malicious or ignorant.  You can pick which one you are, as this is a statement of fact, not an opinion.

I get that liberals want to pretend they aren't groomers, but their activity is what matters.  Constantly defending child porn.  Wanting to censor anyone who disagrees with their lies.  Pretending there are more than 2 genders.  Trying to cancel anyone who doesn't go along with their fairytale.  Trying to say that dressing up as the opposite sex is being your true self and others can't handle it, when it's literally the exact opposite. Even the person in charge of handling this so called child porn issue that you deny was writing in this thesis for his PhD that children should be allowed to use grinder (an app for gays to find each other for sex).  What kind of a sick person hires someone like that for a position supposed to exist to weed out child porn?  I can't even grasp what sort of a stubborn idiot would still maintain that the way things were going was OK...  Then I remember that TwitchySeal is an extortionist troll and it makes sense. 

I usually don't argue with fools these days, as casuals usually can't tell who is who, but I think in this case it's blatantly obvious who the fool is.

Semantics is so bad that the term 'common law' has been codified into leagalease, just so that somebody using "common law" in court, has to define it to be outside of legalease, before he can use the real common law. If he doesn't, he automatically pushes himself into courtroom jurisdiction of the judge, often without even realizing it, and he uses legalease illegally in everything he says or writes pertaining to the case.