Topic: Who will win WW3? - page 45. (Read 66670 times)

Turns out Russian contractors may have written much of the Pentagon's computer systems. This might be funny if it wasn't National Security.  

Pentagon Farmed Out Its Coding to Russia

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/04/pentagon-farmed-out-its-coding-to-russia.html

Yes, I understand.

We would like to get to the end of the thing. But we have this built-in mechanism that keeps us from committing suicide to get there fast. Good thing, too. 'Cause the suicide way generally causes eternal death (Hell), and eternal death isn't the outcome we want.

I hope this is for real this time.

The beginning of WW3 is about to start right now.

U.S. Brings Dogfighters to Counter Russians Over Syria




http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/03/u-s-brings-dogfighters-to-counter-russians-over-syria.html

Regular soldiers, special ops soldiers, they are military troops, members of the U.S. Armed Forces. But who knows; maybe next month the Army will be there too.

Just because they say this or that doesn´t necessarily mean that it´s true or accurate. Accidents can happen of course, people can misspeak and inadvertently tell the truth. But I think it´s best to count on the record of these people which is rock solid serial lying.

Theoretically, it's possible to say, that regular soldiers of U.S. army is not in Syria if we are looking from the point, they aren't going to front to fight. They are just teaching the guerrilas how to fight, so at least from 1 point Obama has kept his promise.

Talking about your last post: the thing that pisses me off, U.S. wants to fight in Syria, where civilian war exists, but didn't want to help the elected government of Ukraine.

P.S. I'm not neither for, nor against U.S.

Last time I checked nobody won the war except gunlords. Pions will die, lords will get paid more.

Well, after Pearl Harbor he didn´t have much of a choice. This is entirely different, Syria hasn´t attacked the U.S. and sending troops to invade this country or that just because you want to is against international law. Not that U.S. officials give a flying eff about law and order. But it could make their invasion forces legitimate targets, That´s how it is with those who break the law they usually aren´t really in a good position to complain when there are consequences.

The third world war will be no winners. Just a few thousand years, archaeologists find remains of the once mighty civilization.

You know, Roosvelt in his president campaign said that USA won't fight in WW2... That's kinda the same, if/when time will come, USA will fight in the war 100%, anyone wants it or not.

Anyway, it´s good that Obama has kept his promise that there would be no boots on the ground in Syria. The troops are wearing...

Well, there are several factions and not entirely clear who´s with whom. Which makes it even more dangerous. Moderate opposition forces, what does that even mean? Maybe it´s what used to be called freedom fighters in Afghanistan and El Salvador a.k.a. terrorists. Osama bin Laden was a freedom fighter (terrorist to those he blew up in that fight) for CIA and democracy until he for some reason turned into a terrorist. Or so they say.

The thing I'm concerned about the most is possible encounter of U.S. soldiers and Russian soldiers as it would most probably start WW3. And it's quite possible as Russians are with the dictator and U.S. with guerilas.

Yes.

Don't worry about having kids now. If you do, go somewhere that you can live off the land if necessary. Other than that, your kids probably won't grow up before the big war. They might barely be born, even if you start now.

It has begun, now it is progressing...

---------------------------------------

The U.S. will send a small number of U.S. special operations forces into Syria as part of a shift in its strategy against ISIS, White House officials announced Friday.

President Barack Obama has authorized a contingent of less than 50 commandos to deploy into northern Syria and work with moderate opposition forces who are fighting the militants.

While the White House has consistently said it would not put U.S. boots on the ground, spokesman Josh Earnest insisted that they will be there in a "train, advise and assist mission" — and not in a combat role.

"It will not be their responsibility to lead the charge up the hill," he said. But he acknowledged they will be in a perilous situation: "There is no denying the amount of risk they are taking on here." NBC News

The cockroaches.     

Stop spamming autistic "everybody dies". WW3 will be beneficial to the winning side who will rule the world.

what if everyone dies during ww3? who will be the winner then?

Cold War 2.0 As Russian Bears Buzz Carrier, Subs Snoop Around Seabed Cables
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/cold-war-2-0-as-russian-bears-buzz-carrier-subs-snoop-1739516001

Bitcoin would not be usable during the conflict. Only gold and fiat cash

The problem with the direction that Graham Hancock and others are taking us is, it is extremely dangerous. The direction that they seem to be going is the direction of using drugs to stimulate what seems to be contact of what seem to be aliens in different dimensions.

This is the exact thing that the advanced ancients seemed to have done, and the result was a crash of climate that killed almost all of them.

There is nothing wrong with advancing technologically. The wrong lies in doing things that work, without grasping the fundamentals of what you are doing. Such is delving into the so-called spirit world, and simply accepting what is given by the so-called spirits without checking out, in detail, the science behind it. Now, I am not suggesting that it is spirit contact. but there is something there that should be learned about before it is used without a great amount of study first.

Some, including myself, would say that God caused the climate disaster that destroyed the ancients. Others might say that it was the dimensional spirits that did it. Still others will say that there is a lot more to the make-up of the human mind and how it can interact with the universe, and that such interaction needs to be completely controlled to keep from causing great changes in nature and climate.

Whatever the truth is, it seems that Hancock and others, in the name of scientific advancement, are making the same mistakes that the ancients made, or at least promoting such. They are taking shortcuts to finding out about how things work, through the use of hallucinogenic drugs, etc., without attempting to find the true science behind the things that they are doing, by experimentation. Is this going to be the cause of a new nature/climate failure in the near future?